RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    뺑소니사고에 미치는 심리적 요인 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102101877

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to suggest a basic material in making deterrence policy of hit-and-run crashes. Analysing psychological factors that impact to the hit-and-run crashes of drivers will be the first step to prevent those crashes. However, previous studies are focused on the factors of road conditions, types of vehicles, characteristics of victims and drivers, not psychological factor.
    This study is focused on the psychological factor. For this study, 268 drivers-whose license were suspended for accidents, law violation or drinking driving offending- self-reported data were used. This study analysed the psychological factor to hit-and-run crash. For analysing, multiple regression analysis was conducted. The results are as follows. First, this study categorized the psychological factors as four factors, afraid of accident, probability of arrest, and hiding psychology, absence of surveillance. Second, results revealed that hiding psychology, absence of surveillance are significant factors to the hit-and-run psychology. The most powerful factor is hiding psychology.
    This study had a major limitation. First, data used this study were not targeted only an hit-and-run crashes experienced drivers. Second, the study area was constrained to only tow provinces, which put restraint on generalization of the study results. Nevertheless, this study made valuable contributions in establishing hit-and-run deterrence policy. Future study should takes this limitation into consideration.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to suggest a basic material in making deterrence policy of hit-and-run crashes. Analysing psychological factors that impact to the hit-and-run crashes of drivers will be the first step to prevent those crashes. However, pr...

    The purpose of this study is to suggest a basic material in making deterrence policy of hit-and-run crashes. Analysing psychological factors that impact to the hit-and-run crashes of drivers will be the first step to prevent those crashes. However, previous studies are focused on the factors of road conditions, types of vehicles, characteristics of victims and drivers, not psychological factor.
    This study is focused on the psychological factor. For this study, 268 drivers-whose license were suspended for accidents, law violation or drinking driving offending- self-reported data were used. This study analysed the psychological factor to hit-and-run crash. For analysing, multiple regression analysis was conducted. The results are as follows. First, this study categorized the psychological factors as four factors, afraid of accident, probability of arrest, and hiding psychology, absence of surveillance. Second, results revealed that hiding psychology, absence of surveillance are significant factors to the hit-and-run psychology. The most powerful factor is hiding psychology.
    This study had a major limitation. First, data used this study were not targeted only an hit-and-run crashes experienced drivers. Second, the study area was constrained to only tow provinces, which put restraint on generalization of the study results. Nevertheless, this study made valuable contributions in establishing hit-and-run deterrence policy. Future study should takes this limitation into consideration.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 www.police.go.kr, "통계자료"

    2 하태준, "뺑소니사건의 예방 및 검거율 제고방안" 치안정책연구소 2000

    3 유백준, "뺑소니교통사고에 관한 연구" 조선대학교 정책대학원 2006

    4 정신교, "뺑소니 운전자의 판단기준" 대한교통학회 5 (5): 2008

    5 김세돈, "교통사고의 문제점 및 대처방안" 서라벌대학교 1998

    6 김형만, "교통범죄에 관한 한국과 일본의 비교연구 : 주로 뺑소니 범죄를 중심으로" 대불대학교 2 : 1996

    7 中村正一, "多變量解釋法" 1983

    8 최종성, "spss ver 10을 이용한 현대통계분석" 2000

    9 Tay, R., "logistic model of the effects of roadway, environmental, vehicle, crash and driver characteristics on hit-and-run crashes" 1330-1336, 2008

    10 Peck, R. C., "The relationship between blood alcohol concentration(BAC), age, and crash risk" (39) : 311-319, 2008

    1 www.police.go.kr, "통계자료"

    2 하태준, "뺑소니사건의 예방 및 검거율 제고방안" 치안정책연구소 2000

    3 유백준, "뺑소니교통사고에 관한 연구" 조선대학교 정책대학원 2006

    4 정신교, "뺑소니 운전자의 판단기준" 대한교통학회 5 (5): 2008

    5 김세돈, "교통사고의 문제점 및 대처방안" 서라벌대학교 1998

    6 김형만, "교통범죄에 관한 한국과 일본의 비교연구 : 주로 뺑소니 범죄를 중심으로" 대불대학교 2 : 1996

    7 中村正一, "多變量解釋法" 1983

    8 최종성, "spss ver 10을 이용한 현대통계분석" 2000

    9 Tay, R., "logistic model of the effects of roadway, environmental, vehicle, crash and driver characteristics on hit-and-run crashes" 1330-1336, 2008

    10 Peck, R. C., "The relationship between blood alcohol concentration(BAC), age, and crash risk" (39) : 311-319, 2008

    11 Lewis, S., "The merits of the automobile accident compensation plan" 3 (3): 583-597, 1936

    12 Solnick, S., "The hit-and-run in fatal pedestrian accidents: victims, circumstances and drivers" 27 (27): 643-649, 1995

    13 Solnick, S., "Hit the bottle and run: the role of alcohol in hit-and-run pedestrian fatalities" 55 (55): 679-684, 1994

    14 Tay, R., "Factors contributing to hit-and-run in fatal crashes" 41 : 227-233, 2009

    15 Blomberg, R. D., "Crash risk of alcohol involved driving-A Case-Control Study" 191-, 2005

    16 Compton, R. P., "Crash risk of alcohol impaired driving" 39-44, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.49 0.49 0.54
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.52 0.58 0.661 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼