RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    RNN, GRU, LSTM 모델을 이용한 낙동강 유역 잠재증발산량 예측 및 비교 = Prediction and Comparison of Potential Evapotranspiration Using RNN, GRU, and LSTM Models in the Nakdong River Basin

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110143012

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of deep learning-based time-series models for predicting reference evapotranspiration (ET₀), benchmarkedagainst the FAO Penman-Monteith (FAO-PM) method. We developed and compared three representative Recurrent Neural Network (RNN)models—basic RNN, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)—using daily meteorological data from 21 observationstations across the Nakdong River Basin in South Korea. The results consistently showed that LSTM and GRU models, which incorporate gatemechanisms, significantly outperformed the basic RNN model in prediction accuracy across all stations. The LSTM model demonstrated the best overallperformance, achieving the lowest average Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.871 mm/day and the highest coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.767during the test period. The GRU model's performance was nearly equivalent to LSTM’s, making it a computationally efficient alternative. While therelative superiority of the models was consistent, the absolute prediction error varied depending on the distinct climatic characteristics of each station.
    Accuracy was highest at stations with stable wind conditions, whereas errors increased in coastal areas with strong, variable winds. These findingsdemonstrate that LSTM and GRU are robust and reliable data-driven methodologies for accurately predicting ET₀ across diverse climate environments,highlighting their high potential as effective tools for agricultural water resource management.
    번역하기

    This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of deep learning-based time-series models for predicting reference evapotranspiration (ET₀), benchmarkedagainst the FAO Penman-Monteith (FAO-PM) method. We developed and compared three representative Re...

    This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of deep learning-based time-series models for predicting reference evapotranspiration (ET₀), benchmarkedagainst the FAO Penman-Monteith (FAO-PM) method. We developed and compared three representative Recurrent Neural Network (RNN)models—basic RNN, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)—using daily meteorological data from 21 observationstations across the Nakdong River Basin in South Korea. The results consistently showed that LSTM and GRU models, which incorporate gatemechanisms, significantly outperformed the basic RNN model in prediction accuracy across all stations. The LSTM model demonstrated the best overallperformance, achieving the lowest average Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.871 mm/day and the highest coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.767during the test period. The GRU model's performance was nearly equivalent to LSTM’s, making it a computationally efficient alternative. While therelative superiority of the models was consistent, the absolute prediction error varied depending on the distinct climatic characteristics of each station.
    Accuracy was highest at stations with stable wind conditions, whereas errors increased in coastal areas with strong, variable winds. These findingsdemonstrate that LSTM and GRU are robust and reliable data-driven methodologies for accurately predicting ET₀ across diverse climate environments,highlighting their high potential as effective tools for agricultural water resource management.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼