RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    분기 GDP 전망을 위한 초단기예측모형의 예측력 비교 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11608725

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대전 : 忠南大學校 大學院, 2009

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 忠南大學校 大學院 , 統計學科 統計學專攻 , 2009. 2

    • 발행연도

      2009

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      519.5 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      대전

    • 기타서명

      (A) Study on the Comparative Evaluations of Very Short-term Forecasting Models for Forecasting Performance

    • 형태사항

      iii, 62p. : 도표 ; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      충남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수:朴來鉉
      참고문헌: p.52-54

    • 소장기관
      • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This thesis compared the forecasting performance among models to promptly forecast GDP with slow announcement cycle after estimating very short-term model. The very short-term model is mainly used to forecast GDP of quarter based on co-movement with monthly economic variables that have short cycle in the formation of data.
    The very short-term models constructed in this research are Intervention Model, Transfer Function Model, VAR Model, Factor Model and Simultaneous Equation Model, whose explanatory power is found to be good generally.
    Considering the term of foreign exchange crisis as exogenous impact, Intervention Model established AR Model in which effect of intervention of foreign exchange crisis was estimated. The Transfer Function Model was constructed by taking composite indexes and business survey index, the representative monthly indicator of overall economy, as explanatory variables. Further, VAR Model, multi-variate model was constructed to evaluate forecast ability and many economic indicators were compressed into a few factor score through factor model so as to be used as explanatory variables of regression model. Finally, the Simultaneous Equation Model approached in the aspect of production of national account was estimated.
    Evaluating the forecast ability of model, it was found that the forecast error calculated by MAPE of all models was within 1%, good value. In the case of Factor Model and Simultaneous Equation Model where monthly information can be reflected into model, the forecast error was decreased with the addition of monthly economic indicator. Especially, the forecast ability of model can be improved by Intervention Model when forecast is done by considering unexpected variables in the model, namely, policy variable with high exogeneity, international economic situation. Thanks to its merit to reflect many economic indicators, factor model showed relatively excellent forecast ability compared to other models. Further, it was confirmed that forecast value made by averaging all models further reduces forecast error than the method to utilize only a few models in forecasting GDP.
    번역하기

    This thesis compared the forecasting performance among models to promptly forecast GDP with slow announcement cycle after estimating very short-term model. The very short-term model is mainly used to forecast GDP of quarter based on co-movement with m...

    This thesis compared the forecasting performance among models to promptly forecast GDP with slow announcement cycle after estimating very short-term model. The very short-term model is mainly used to forecast GDP of quarter based on co-movement with monthly economic variables that have short cycle in the formation of data.
    The very short-term models constructed in this research are Intervention Model, Transfer Function Model, VAR Model, Factor Model and Simultaneous Equation Model, whose explanatory power is found to be good generally.
    Considering the term of foreign exchange crisis as exogenous impact, Intervention Model established AR Model in which effect of intervention of foreign exchange crisis was estimated. The Transfer Function Model was constructed by taking composite indexes and business survey index, the representative monthly indicator of overall economy, as explanatory variables. Further, VAR Model, multi-variate model was constructed to evaluate forecast ability and many economic indicators were compressed into a few factor score through factor model so as to be used as explanatory variables of regression model. Finally, the Simultaneous Equation Model approached in the aspect of production of national account was estimated.
    Evaluating the forecast ability of model, it was found that the forecast error calculated by MAPE of all models was within 1%, good value. In the case of Factor Model and Simultaneous Equation Model where monthly information can be reflected into model, the forecast error was decreased with the addition of monthly economic indicator. Especially, the forecast ability of model can be improved by Intervention Model when forecast is done by considering unexpected variables in the model, namely, policy variable with high exogeneity, international economic situation. Thanks to its merit to reflect many economic indicators, factor model showed relatively excellent forecast ability compared to other models. Further, it was confirmed that forecast value made by averaging all models further reduces forecast error than the method to utilize only a few models in forecasting GDP.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • Ⅱ. 초단기예측모형의 개요 4
    • 1. 계량경제모형의 분류 4
    • 2. 초단기예측모형의 필요성 5
    • Ⅲ. 초단기예측모형의 방법론 8
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • Ⅱ. 초단기예측모형의 개요 4
    • 1. 계량경제모형의 분류 4
    • 2. 초단기예측모형의 필요성 5
    • Ⅲ. 초단기예측모형의 방법론 8
    • 1. ARIMA모형 9
    • 2. 전이함수모형 13
    • 3. 개입모형 16
    • 4. 인자모형 20
    • 5. VAR모형 21
    • 6. 연립방정식모형 23
    • Ⅳ. 모형설정 및 추정 결과 25
    • 1. 개입모형의 추정 결과 25
    • 2. reg-ARIMA모형의 추정 결과 31
    • 3. 인자점수를 이용한 회귀모형의 추정 결과 34
    • 4. VAR모형의 추정 결과 38
    • 5. 연립방정식모형의 추정 결과 41
    • Ⅴ. 모형의 예측력 비교 45
    • 1. 모형의 예측력 평가 방법 45
    • 2. 모형의 예측력 평가 결과 46
    • Ⅵ. 결론 49
    • 참고문헌 52
    • ABSTRACT 55
    • [부록1]모형별 예측모의실험 결과 그래프 58
    • [부록2]연립방정식모형 추정결과 59
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼