RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개방형 혁신에 의한 R&D 연구의 효율성 평가 분석 : 과학기술적 성과 관점에서 AHP-DEA방법론 적용 = Open Innovation R&D Efficiency Evaluation by Integrated AHP‐DEA

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103752867

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The current environment of technological and competitive changes influences not only the business R&D environment but also government driven national R&D strategies. Open innovation has now become an important paradigm that is replacing the outdated paradigm of closed innovation. Many companies and nations have been increasing R&D investment because R&D has been considered a driving force for national and corporate competitive advantage. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare the performance of R&D focused on open innovation according to scientific and technological outputs which is based on paper publications, patents and etc. Comparisons should not be only based on the quantity but also on the quality of the output. This paper shows that it is possible to develop DEA models that utilize the Analytical Hierarchical Process in order to transform the qualitative index into a quantitative index. Hence, the relative efficiency for R&D organizations is obtained based on both quantity and quality outputs and subsequently provides comprehensive and realistic methods for decision makers to identify levels of project efficiency.
    번역하기

    The current environment of technological and competitive changes influences not only the business R&D environment but also government driven national R&D strategies. Open innovation has now become an important paradigm that is replacing the outdated p...

    The current environment of technological and competitive changes influences not only the business R&D environment but also government driven national R&D strategies. Open innovation has now become an important paradigm that is replacing the outdated paradigm of closed innovation. Many companies and nations have been increasing R&D investment because R&D has been considered a driving force for national and corporate competitive advantage. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare the performance of R&D focused on open innovation according to scientific and technological outputs which is based on paper publications, patents and etc. Comparisons should not be only based on the quantity but also on the quality of the output. This paper shows that it is possible to develop DEA models that utilize the Analytical Hierarchical Process in order to transform the qualitative index into a quantitative index. Hence, the relative efficiency for R&D organizations is obtained based on both quantity and quality outputs and subsequently provides comprehensive and realistic methods for decision makers to identify levels of project efficiency.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 윤진효, "특허기반 개방형 혁신 분석 모델 개발 및 적용 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 13 (13): 99-123, 2010

    2 박성민, "복합성과평가지수를 활용한 정부지원 R&D 과제의 성과평가에 관한 연구*: 응용기술개발지원 융자사업을 중심으로" 대한경영학회 25 (25): 1259-1281, 2012

    3 박석종, "과학기술적 성과 관점에서 정부 R&D사업 효율성 분석에 관한 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 14 (14): 205-222, 2011

    4 Meng, W., "Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation" 36 : 950-957, 2008

    5 Berchicci, L., "Towards an open R&D system : Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance" 42 : 117-127, 2012

    6 Lee, J.J., "The Role of Government and The Strategy of Post Catch-up Science and Technology" 223-239, 2010

    7 손소영, "Structural equation model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria" 30 : 10-20, 2007

    8 Choi, T.G., "Strategic Design of the Government R&D Management System based on the Analysis of Relationship between R&D Program Types and their Outputs" Konkuk University

    9 Banker, R.D., "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis" 30 : 1078-1092, 1984

    10 Wang, E.C., "Relative efficiency of R&D activities : A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach" 36 : 260-273, 2007

    1 윤진효, "특허기반 개방형 혁신 분석 모델 개발 및 적용 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 13 (13): 99-123, 2010

    2 박성민, "복합성과평가지수를 활용한 정부지원 R&D 과제의 성과평가에 관한 연구*: 응용기술개발지원 융자사업을 중심으로" 대한경영학회 25 (25): 1259-1281, 2012

    3 박석종, "과학기술적 성과 관점에서 정부 R&D사업 효율성 분석에 관한 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 14 (14): 205-222, 2011

    4 Meng, W., "Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation" 36 : 950-957, 2008

    5 Berchicci, L., "Towards an open R&D system : Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance" 42 : 117-127, 2012

    6 Lee, J.J., "The Role of Government and The Strategy of Post Catch-up Science and Technology" 223-239, 2010

    7 손소영, "Structural equation model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria" 30 : 10-20, 2007

    8 Choi, T.G., "Strategic Design of the Government R&D Management System based on the Analysis of Relationship between R&D Program Types and their Outputs" Konkuk University

    9 Banker, R.D., "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis" 30 : 1078-1092, 1984

    10 Wang, E.C., "Relative efficiency of R&D activities : A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach" 36 : 260-273, 2007

    11 박성민, "R&D 프로젝트의 성과평가를 위한 DEA효율성지수와 정규화지표의 합치도 분석" 대한경영학회 24 (24): 1999-2014, 2011

    12 박성민, "R&D 프로젝트 효율성 상관분석 및 사업포지셔닝 조사를 위한 2단계 DEA/AR-I 성과평가모형" 대한경영학회 23 (23): 3285-3303, 2010

    13 Chesbrough, H.W., "Open Innovation : the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology" Harvard Business school press 2006

    14 Management Manual of R&D Performance in Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, "Ministry of Education" Science and Technology, National Research Foundation of Korea 50-51, 2009

    15 Charnes, A., "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units" 3 : 429-444, 1978

    16 Hsu, P.M., "Measuring realtive efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects : A three- stage approach" 32 : 178-186, 2009

    17 Kim, M.S., "Internet shopping mall evaluation by AHP/DEA" Korea University 2001

    18 Ho, W., "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review" 186 : 211-228, 2008

    19 Lee, K.W., "Implication and Analysis of Application system and management of Pubic R&D Performance" 2 : 3-7, 2012

    20 Saaty, T.L., "How to Make a Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process" 48 : 9-26, 1990

    21 Jyoti, Banwet D.K., "Evaluating performance of national R&D organizations using integrated DEA-AHP technique" 57 : 370-386, 2008

    22 Cho, Y.G., "Development of an evaluation model in public R&D programmes-conceptual approach" korean Operations Research and Management Science Society 1045-1051, 2005

    23 Bae, J.T., "Development of a performance index in private company R&D activity" 12 : 45-69, 1998

    24 이덕주, "DEA/AHP 모형을 이용한 R&D 프로젝트 선정모형 및 Web 기반 R&D 프로젝트 선정시스템 개발" 대한산업공학회 32 (32): 18-28, 2006

    25 Liu, J.S., "DEA and ranking with the network-based approach : a case of R&D performance" 38 : 453-464, 2010

    26 Kim, M.S., "Countstratgy Post catch-up in Mobile Phone industry" 22 : 1-16, 2010

    27 Lin, M.I., "Applying integrated DEA/AHP to evaluate the economic performance of local governments in China" 209 : 129-140, 2011

    28 Cho, K.T., "Analytic Hierarchy Decision Making of Proceeding Leaders" Donghyun 9-12, 2003

    29 Kim, S.H., "Analysis and Application of Decision making. 8th ed" Youngchimunwhasa 379-401, 2009

    30 Wang, Y.M., "An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment" 54 : 513-525, 2009

    31 Kim, B.W., "An effective R&D performance measurement system : survey of Korean R&D researchers" 30 : 19-31, 2002

    32 장현덕, "AHP와 DEA 활용을 통한 효율적인 유망 기술 선정" 한국기업경영학회 18 (18): 67-85, 2011

    33 Yang, W.M., "A study on the selection methodology of R&D projects using DEA/AHP with ordinal factors" Kyung Hee University 2003

    34 Choi, J.W., "A study on the improvement of management outcomes in the start-up companies using AHP and DEA-Focusing on the tenant companies of business incubator center" Ky

    35 Yang, T., "A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem" 147 : 128-136, 2003

    36 Shang, J., "A Unified Framework for the Selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System" 85 : 297-315, 1995

    37 Kim, H.B., "A Performance Indicator Roadmap Framework for evaluating Government R&D Programs" 1-9, 2009

    38 Kim, Y.G., "A Direction of Industrial Technology Policy for Open Innovation" KIAT 2011

    39 Rhim, H.S., "A DEA/AHP hybrid model for evaluation and selection of R&D projects" 24 : 1-12, 1999

    40 Bitman, W.R., "A Conceptual Framework for Ranking R&D Projects" 55 : 267-278, 2008

    41 Yim, H., "2010 Technology Level Evaluation Report -95 Focued Science Technology-" KISTEP 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-11-29 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING KCI등재
    2021-11-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering -> Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-12-04 학술지명변경 한글명 : 산업경영시스템학회지 -> 한국산업경영시스템학회지
    외국어명 : Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering -> Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering
    KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.34 0.34 0.3
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.28 0.28 0.37 0.16
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼