RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    요청'에 나타나는 우리나라 중학생들의 어휘 사용에 대한 코퍼스적 분석 = A corpus analysis of the use of vocabulary in requests by Korean middle school students.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76598708

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This is a descriptive study which investigated the use of vocabulary in requests by Korean middle school students. Seventy two 2nd graders in a middle school in Seoul were asked to write down their responses to five request situations in the Cartoon DCT. Using WordSmith Tools 5.0 version, their responses were analyzed in terms of the average number of vocabulary tokens(response length), the range of vocabulary, and its frequency in each request situation. The vocabulary used by middle school students was compared to that of English native speakers. The results showed that the middle school students were found to produce about 10 vocabulary tokens regardless of situations. Second, interestingly enough, middle school students' range of vocabulary was as wide as that of English native speakers. Third, there were some differences between the groups in terms of their preference for certain vocabulary items under specific situations. The results are expected to provide useful information on vocabulary teaching in speech acts and materials developments.
    번역하기

    This is a descriptive study which investigated the use of vocabulary in requests by Korean middle school students. Seventy two 2nd graders in a middle school in Seoul were asked to write down their responses to five request situations in the Cartoon D...

    This is a descriptive study which investigated the use of vocabulary in requests by Korean middle school students. Seventy two 2nd graders in a middle school in Seoul were asked to write down their responses to five request situations in the Cartoon DCT. Using WordSmith Tools 5.0 version, their responses were analyzed in terms of the average number of vocabulary tokens(response length), the range of vocabulary, and its frequency in each request situation. The vocabulary used by middle school students was compared to that of English native speakers. The results showed that the middle school students were found to produce about 10 vocabulary tokens regardless of situations. Second, interestingly enough, middle school students' range of vocabulary was as wide as that of English native speakers. Third, there were some differences between the groups in terms of their preference for certain vocabulary items under specific situations. The results are expected to provide useful information on vocabulary teaching in speech acts and materials developments.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Decarrico,J.S, "Vocabulary learning and teaching.In Teaching English as a second or foreign language" Heinle & Heinle 285-299, 2001

    2 Brown,P, "Universals in language usage:Politeness phenomena.In Questions and politeness" Cambridge University Press 56-289, 1978

    3 Hill,T, "The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context" Temple University 1997

    4 Searle,J, "Speech acts" Cambridge University Press 1969

    5 Coady,J, "Second language vocabulary acquisition" Cambridge University Press 1997

    6 Blum-Kulka,S, "Requests and apologies:Across-cultural study of speech act realization patterns(CCSARPP)" 5 : 198-212, 1986

    7 Read,B, "Preschool children’s production of directive forms" 1 : 233-245, 1978

    8 Bardovi-Harlig,K, "Pragmatics as part of teacher education" 1 : 28-32, 1992

    9 Beebe,L.M, "Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals.In Developing communicative competence in a second language" Newbury House 55-73, 1990

    10 Kasper,G, "Pragmatic transfer" 8 : 203-231, 1992

    1 Decarrico,J.S, "Vocabulary learning and teaching.In Teaching English as a second or foreign language" Heinle & Heinle 285-299, 2001

    2 Brown,P, "Universals in language usage:Politeness phenomena.In Questions and politeness" Cambridge University Press 56-289, 1978

    3 Hill,T, "The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context" Temple University 1997

    4 Searle,J, "Speech acts" Cambridge University Press 1969

    5 Coady,J, "Second language vocabulary acquisition" Cambridge University Press 1997

    6 Blum-Kulka,S, "Requests and apologies:Across-cultural study of speech act realization patterns(CCSARPP)" 5 : 198-212, 1986

    7 Read,B, "Preschool children’s production of directive forms" 1 : 233-245, 1978

    8 Bardovi-Harlig,K, "Pragmatics as part of teacher education" 1 : 28-32, 1992

    9 Beebe,L.M, "Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals.In Developing communicative competence in a second language" Newbury House 55-73, 1990

    10 Kasper,G, "Pragmatic transfer" 8 : 203-231, 1992

    11 House,J, "Politeness markers in English and German.In Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech" Mouton 157-185, 1981

    12 Wolfson,N, "Perspectives:Sociolinguistics and TESOL" Newbury House 1989

    13 Scarcella,R, "On speaking politely in a second language.In On TESOL ‘79" TESOL 275-287, 1979

    14 Achiba,M, "Learning to request in a second language:A study of child interlanguage pragmatics" Multilingual Matters 2003

    15 Ervin-Tripp,S, "Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives" 5 : 25-66, 1976

    16 Moon,Y, "Interlanguage features of Korean EFL learners in the communicative act of complaining" 53 (53): 3-24, 1998

    17 McTear,M, "Getting it done:The development of children’s abilities to negotiate request sequences in peer interaction" 4 (4): 1-29, 1980

    18 Bardovi-Harlig,K, "Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics.A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics" 49 (49): 677-713, 1999

    19 Moon, Young-in, "Effects of DCT Types in Eliciting Interlanguage Pragmatics Data from Low-level Learners" 한국영어교육학회 60 (60): 277-297, 2005

    20 문영인, "Developmental features of pragmatic competence by linguistic proficiency in requests and complaints" 한국외국어교육학회 13 (13): 193-213, 2006

    21 Tatton,H, "Could you,perhaps,pretty please?:Request directness in cross-cultural speech act realization" 8 (8): 1-4, 2008

    22 Becker,J, "Children’s strategic use of requests to mark and manipulate social status.In Language development: Language, thought and culture" Lawrence Erlbaum 1-35, 1982

    23 Olshtain,E, "Apology:A speech act set.In Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition" Newbury House 18-35, 1983

    24 Searle,J, "A classification of illocutionary acts" 5 : 1-23, 1976

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.75 0.75 0.77
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.68 1.275 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼