RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    조직-공중관계성과 이미지의 관계 = 행위적 관계와 상징적 관계의 상호작용

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76210133

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to suggest that effectiveness of public relations should be evaluated in terms of public relationships(behavioral relationships) as well as image(symbolic relationships). For the study, it empirically examined the relationships between corporation's public relationships and corporate image and furthermore explored whether the relationships differed depending on the type of corporations (Public/private) as well as the characteristic of groups (professional/non-professional). A survey was conducted with 423 respondents. The study found that there were statistically significant positive correlations between corporate image and multiple components of public relationships in public and private corporations as well as in professional and non-professional groups. Moreover, it found that the components of public relationships affecting significantly corporate image were same, except one component, in both corporations. It also discovered that the components of public relationships affecting corporate image were different in each professional group and non-professional one, for a public corporation, whereas they were almost same in both groups, except one component, for a private corporation. Conclusively, these findings suggest that there were close relationships between corporate image and public relationships and thus effectiveness of public relationship should be evaluated in terms of behavioral relationships as well as of symbolic relationships,
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to suggest that effectiveness of public relations should be evaluated in terms of public relationships(behavioral relationships) as well as image(symbolic relationships). For the study, it empirically examined the relation...

    The purpose of this study is to suggest that effectiveness of public relations should be evaluated in terms of public relationships(behavioral relationships) as well as image(symbolic relationships). For the study, it empirically examined the relationships between corporation's public relationships and corporate image and furthermore explored whether the relationships differed depending on the type of corporations (Public/private) as well as the characteristic of groups (professional/non-professional). A survey was conducted with 423 respondents. The study found that there were statistically significant positive correlations between corporate image and multiple components of public relationships in public and private corporations as well as in professional and non-professional groups. Moreover, it found that the components of public relationships affecting significantly corporate image were same, except one component, in both corporations. It also discovered that the components of public relationships affecting corporate image were different in each professional group and non-professional one, for a public corporation, whereas they were almost same in both groups, except one component, for a private corporation. Conclusively, these findings suggest that there were close relationships between corporate image and public relationships and thus effectiveness of public relationship should be evaluated in terms of behavioral relationships as well as of symbolic relationships,

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.75 1.75 1.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.07 2.11 2.773 0.4
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼