RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    유라시아 상고 신화의 두 사례 - 마고신화와 반고신화의 비교연구 = Two Cases of Ancient Eurasian Myths - A Comparative Study of Mago and Pangu Myths

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110219803

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to investigate the differences in worldviews and views of humanity underlying two representative ancient Eurasian myths: the Korean Mago myth and the Chinese Pangu myth. The way a myth defines its deities reflects how that cultural tradition defines humans and the world.
    Thus, this study examines the theological and anthropological perspectives centered on the Mago myth from the Korean Seondo text Budozi and the Pangu myth from the Chinese texts Sanwu Liji and Wuyun Linianji.The results show that the Mago myth, based on the unique Qi-philosophical worldview of Korean Seondo, presents Mago as a god of harmony and depicts an active, independent view of humanity. Humans are born as direct descendants of the creator Mago, possessing a divine nature within themselves, and sharing an equal status with the divine. This egalitarian theology expands into a life-symbiosis worldview where humans and nature are not subjects of domination but siblings, leading to the practical ideology of Hongik Ingan.Conversely, the Pangu myth features a sacrificial god whose dead body transforms into all things in the universe. Notably, humans are described as originating from insects that lived on Pangu’s body, revealing a theology of separation between god and human that highlights a strict hierarchy and disconnection between the creator and the created. This passive view of humanity justified the discriminatory status system and patriarchal ruling structure within Chinese society. Furthermore, it formed the philosophical foundation for a hierarchical hegemonic worldview, where the superior center must enlighten and dominate the inferior periphery.In conclusion, comparing these two creation myths confirms the origins of two fundamental thought systems in Northeast Asia: the symbiotic culture based on equality and harmony pursued by Korean Seondo, and the hierarchical order based on opposition and domination embedded in Chinese thought.
    번역하기

    This study aims to investigate the differences in worldviews and views of humanity underlying two representative ancient Eurasian myths: the Korean Mago myth and the Chinese Pangu myth. The way a myth defines its deities reflects how that cultural tra...

    This study aims to investigate the differences in worldviews and views of humanity underlying two representative ancient Eurasian myths: the Korean Mago myth and the Chinese Pangu myth. The way a myth defines its deities reflects how that cultural tradition defines humans and the world.
    Thus, this study examines the theological and anthropological perspectives centered on the Mago myth from the Korean Seondo text Budozi and the Pangu myth from the Chinese texts Sanwu Liji and Wuyun Linianji.The results show that the Mago myth, based on the unique Qi-philosophical worldview of Korean Seondo, presents Mago as a god of harmony and depicts an active, independent view of humanity. Humans are born as direct descendants of the creator Mago, possessing a divine nature within themselves, and sharing an equal status with the divine. This egalitarian theology expands into a life-symbiosis worldview where humans and nature are not subjects of domination but siblings, leading to the practical ideology of Hongik Ingan.Conversely, the Pangu myth features a sacrificial god whose dead body transforms into all things in the universe. Notably, humans are described as originating from insects that lived on Pangu’s body, revealing a theology of separation between god and human that highlights a strict hierarchy and disconnection between the creator and the created. This passive view of humanity justified the discriminatory status system and patriarchal ruling structure within Chinese society. Furthermore, it formed the philosophical foundation for a hierarchical hegemonic worldview, where the superior center must enlighten and dominate the inferior periphery.In conclusion, comparing these two creation myths confirms the origins of two fundamental thought systems in Northeast Asia: the symbiotic culture based on equality and harmony pursued by Korean Seondo, and the hierarchical order based on opposition and domination embedded in Chinese thought.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼