RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    Effectiveness of Herbal Medicine Compared to Antidepressants in Patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders Accompanied by Depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110240497

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Objectives: Depression affects approximately 28.6% of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). Although herbal medicine (HM) has been proposed as a therapeutic option, its comparative effectiveness relative to antidepressants remains uncertain. This systematic review compared HM with antidepressants as adjuncts to antipsychotics in patients with SSD and comorbid depression.
    Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to January 15, 2025, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared HM plus antipsychotics with antidepressants plus antipsychotics in patients with SSD and depression were included. Primary outcomes were depressive symptom scores (Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) and response rates. Secondary outcomes included overall psychiatric symptoms and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool; certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.
    Results: Seven RCTs comprising 505 participants were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference between HM and antidepressants in depressive symptoms (SMD −0.19, 95% CI [−0.54, 0.15]; very low-certainty evidence), response rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI [0.96, 1.04]; low-certainty evidence), or overall psychiatric symptoms (SMD −0.06, 95% CI [−0.84, 0.73]; low-certainty evidence). Adverse event rates showed a nonsignificant trend favoring HM (RR 0.56, 95% CI [0.06, 5.26]; low-certainty evidence).
    Conclusion: Very low- to low-certainty evidence suggests no significant difference in effectiveness between HM and antidepressants as adjuncts to antipsychotics for depression in SSD. Although HM may serve as an alternative, high-quality, large-scale trials are required to establish definitive conclusions.
    번역하기

    Objectives: Depression affects approximately 28.6% of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). Although herbal medicine (HM) has been proposed as a therapeutic option, its comparative effectiveness relative to antidepressants remains unce...

    Objectives: Depression affects approximately 28.6% of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). Although herbal medicine (HM) has been proposed as a therapeutic option, its comparative effectiveness relative to antidepressants remains uncertain. This systematic review compared HM with antidepressants as adjuncts to antipsychotics in patients with SSD and comorbid depression.
    Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to January 15, 2025, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared HM plus antipsychotics with antidepressants plus antipsychotics in patients with SSD and depression were included. Primary outcomes were depressive symptom scores (Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) and response rates. Secondary outcomes included overall psychiatric symptoms and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool; certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.
    Results: Seven RCTs comprising 505 participants were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference between HM and antidepressants in depressive symptoms (SMD −0.19, 95% CI [−0.54, 0.15]; very low-certainty evidence), response rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI [0.96, 1.04]; low-certainty evidence), or overall psychiatric symptoms (SMD −0.06, 95% CI [−0.84, 0.73]; low-certainty evidence). Adverse event rates showed a nonsignificant trend favoring HM (RR 0.56, 95% CI [0.06, 5.26]; low-certainty evidence).
    Conclusion: Very low- to low-certainty evidence suggests no significant difference in effectiveness between HM and antidepressants as adjuncts to antipsychotics for depression in SSD. Although HM may serve as an alternative, high-quality, large-scale trials are required to establish definitive conclusions.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼