RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      역량기반 교육과정의 근거로서 인지 및 비인지 역량의 관계 = An analysis of relation between cognitive and non-cognitive competences as the foundation of competence-based curriculum

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60239103

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      We currently witness an increase in the currency of educational phrases involving ``competence``, which translates into requests for curriculum reform suitable for our next generation. As is often noted, such requests in fact emphasize non-cognitive competences such as social skills, personal attitudes and ethical behaviors as the essential contents of our new curriculum. In spite of the currently high volume of scholarly works on competence-based curriculum reform that usually stresses learning and teaching of non-cognitive competences, however, it is not clear what the relationship we can draw between cognitive and non-cognitive competences. As the relation between the two can clarify the specific strategies of reforming the current curriculum, it is crucial for us to examine the types of such relations. Certain philosophical traditions have advocated a positive relation between the two, whereas certain cognitive psychological theories have it denied. And a recent comparative international survey shows that the case is more complicated than such an advocacy-denial dichotomy and that the relation could be diversely set up based upon cultural and social contexts. Thus, competence-based curriculum reform requires further analyses of the relations between cognitive and non-cognitive competences in each subject matter, which have been specifically formed in our cultural and social context.
      번역하기

      We currently witness an increase in the currency of educational phrases involving ``competence``, which translates into requests for curriculum reform suitable for our next generation. As is often noted, such requests in fact emphasize non-cognitive c...

      We currently witness an increase in the currency of educational phrases involving ``competence``, which translates into requests for curriculum reform suitable for our next generation. As is often noted, such requests in fact emphasize non-cognitive competences such as social skills, personal attitudes and ethical behaviors as the essential contents of our new curriculum. In spite of the currently high volume of scholarly works on competence-based curriculum reform that usually stresses learning and teaching of non-cognitive competences, however, it is not clear what the relationship we can draw between cognitive and non-cognitive competences. As the relation between the two can clarify the specific strategies of reforming the current curriculum, it is crucial for us to examine the types of such relations. Certain philosophical traditions have advocated a positive relation between the two, whereas certain cognitive psychological theories have it denied. And a recent comparative international survey shows that the case is more complicated than such an advocacy-denial dichotomy and that the relation could be diversely set up based upon cultural and social contexts. Thus, competence-based curriculum reform requires further analyses of the relations between cognitive and non-cognitive competences in each subject matter, which have been specifically formed in our cultural and social context.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼