2016년 9월 12일 M5.8 경주지진의 데미지 포텐셜 분석 및 내진공학 측면의 시사점

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper investigates seismic damage potential of recent September 12 M5.8 Gyeongju earthquake from diverse earthquake engineering perspectives using the accelerograms recorded at three stations near the epicenter. In time domain, strong motion durations are evaluated based on the accelerograms and compared with statistical averages of the ground motions with similar magnitude, epicentral distance and soil conditions, while Fourier analysis using FFT is performed to identify damaging frequency contents contained in the earthquake. Effective peak ground accelerations are evaluated from the calculated response spectra and compared with apparent peak ground accelerations and the design spectrum in KBC 2016. All these results are used to consistently explain the reason why most of seismic damage in the earthquake was concentrated on low-rise stiff buildings but not quite significant. In order to comparatively appraise the damage potential, the constant ductility spectrum constructed from the Gyeongju earthquake is compared with that of the well-known 1940 El Centro earthquake. Deconvolution analysis by using one accelerogram speculated to be recorded at a stiff soil site is also performed to estimate the soil profile conforming to the response spectrum characteristics. Finally, response history analysis for 39- and 61-story tall buildings is performed as a case study to explain significant building vibration felt on the upper floors of some tall buildings in Busan area during the Gyeongju earthquake. Seismic design and retrofit implications of M5.8 Gyeongju earthquake are summarized for further research efforts and improvements of relevant practice.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서 론
• 2. 경주지진 계측 가속도기록 예비분석
• 3. 동일연성도스펙트럼 및 해외 강진과의 비교
• 3.1 동일연성도스펙트럼 비교분석
• 3.2 손상 포텐셜 비교연구
• 4. 지반효과
• 5. 경주지진에 의한 고층건물 지진응답 분석
• 6. 결 어
• / REFERENCES /

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이영욱, "중력하중에 대하여 설계된 RC 골조의 내진 저항력 추정식의 유도" 한국지진공학회 6 (6): 63-71, 2002

2 "U.S. Geological Survey"

3 Applied Technology Council, "Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. ATC-3-06 (NBS SP-510)"

4 ASCE, "Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. ASCE standard ASCE/SEI 41-13"

5 Philippacopoulos AJ, "Recommendations for resolution of public comments on USI (Unresolved Safety Issues) A-40. Seismic Design Criteria"

6 Korea Institute of Geoscience ad Mineral Resources, "Preliminary Analysis Report of Gyeongju Event (20:30)" Korea Institute of Geoscience ad Mineral Resources 2006

7 Kempton JJ, "Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects" 22 (22): 985-1013, 2006

8 Lee SH, "Performance of an equivalent shear beam(ESB) model container for dynamic geotechnical centrifuge tests" 44 (44): 102-114, 2013

9 AIK, "Korean Building Code and Commentary" Kimoondang 2016

10 "ISO 6897. Guidelines for the evaluation of response of occupants of fixed structures, especially building and off-shore structures, to low-frequency horizontal motion (0.063 Hz to 1 Hz)"

11 Kramer SL, "Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering" Prentice Hall 1996

12 Kim DK, "Effects of shallow soil deposits and substructures on earthquake response spectrum" Seoul National University 2013

13 Newmark NM, "Earthquake Spectra and Design" Earthquake Engineering Research Institute 29-37, 1982

14 FEMA, "A. 440. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. FEMA-440"

15 Trifunac MD, "A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion" 65 (65): 581-626, 1975