RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      구조물 내진보강법에 따른 저층 건축물의 내진성능평가

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102531551

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      After an earthquake occurred in the Gyeongju, 2016, many low-story buildings have been questioned in terms of the seismic performance since mostly they have been exempted from the seismic design requirement since 1988. In this study, a 3-story moment resisting frame (MRF) building was analyzed and evaluated the seismic performance. Due to the insufficient seismic performance required for the seismic performance levels, three different seismic retrofit schemes were proposed and their seismic performances were re-evaluated. While steel brace and open shear wall retrofit systems mainly focused on the strength retrofit, the VES damper retrofit system is mainly to enhance the energy dissipation capacity of the system and resultes in the increased ductility. The original building and 3 retrofitted buildings were evaluated using the nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic analyses and suggestions were proposed. Through the analysis of nonlinear time history and push-over using MIDAS/Gen program, damages of the building in terms of top story and average story drift and effect of reinforcement were analyzed.
      번역하기

      After an earthquake occurred in the Gyeongju, 2016, many low-story buildings have been questioned in terms of the seismic performance since mostly they have been exempted from the seismic design requirement since 1988. In this study, a 3-story moment ...

      After an earthquake occurred in the Gyeongju, 2016, many low-story buildings have been questioned in terms of the seismic performance since mostly they have been exempted from the seismic design requirement since 1988. In this study, a 3-story moment resisting frame (MRF) building was analyzed and evaluated the seismic performance. Due to the insufficient seismic performance required for the seismic performance levels, three different seismic retrofit schemes were proposed and their seismic performances were re-evaluated. While steel brace and open shear wall retrofit systems mainly focused on the strength retrofit, the VES damper retrofit system is mainly to enhance the energy dissipation capacity of the system and resultes in the increased ductility. The original building and 3 retrofitted buildings were evaluated using the nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic analyses and suggestions were proposed. Through the analysis of nonlinear time history and push-over using MIDAS/Gen program, damages of the building in terms of top story and average story drift and effect of reinforcement were analyzed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서 론
      • 2. 대상 건축물의 개요
      • 3. 구조물 내진보강 방법의 개요와 특성
      • 3.1 Steel Brace를 이용한 내진보강
      • 3.2 Open Shear Wall을 이용한 내진보강
      • 1. 서 론
      • 2. 대상 건축물의 개요
      • 3. 구조물 내진보강 방법의 개요와 특성
      • 3.1 Steel Brace를 이용한 내진보강
      • 3.2 Open Shear Wall을 이용한 내진보강
      • 3.3 VES Damper를 이용한 내진보강
      • 3.4 보강 개소 산정
      • 4. 내진 성능 평가 및 해석절차
      • 4.1 예비평가
      • 4.2 비선형 정적 해석
      • 4.3 비선형 동적 해석
      • 5. 결 론
      • / REFERENCES /
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 안충원, "철골브레이스에 의한 기존 RC건축물의 강도상승형 내진보강을 위한 설계고려사항" 한국지진공학회 17 (17): 293-303, 2013

      2 김대훈, "가력하중을 통한 CST30제진댐퍼시스템의 구조성능 평가" 한국공간구조학회 15 (15): 61-68, 2015

      3 Hong Juhee, "Seismic performance evaluation of MRF building structures retrofitted using VES30 damper systems" Sejong University 2016

      4 "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. ATC-40"

      5 Yi YS, "Seismic Performance Evaluation of Shear Wall Retrofitted with FRP" 2013

      6 Korean Educational Development Institute, "Seismic Performance Evaluation and Seismic Retrofit Guidelines for School Structures"

      7 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Seismic Performance Evaluation Method of Existing Structures" 2011

      8 Ministry of Construction & Transportation, "Seismic Design Criteria Research(Ⅱ)" 1997

      9 "Prestandard and Comnmentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings(FEMA 356)"

      10 National Emergency Management Agency, "Guidelines for evaluation of seismic performance of buildings"

      1 안충원, "철골브레이스에 의한 기존 RC건축물의 강도상승형 내진보강을 위한 설계고려사항" 한국지진공학회 17 (17): 293-303, 2013

      2 김대훈, "가력하중을 통한 CST30제진댐퍼시스템의 구조성능 평가" 한국공간구조학회 15 (15): 61-68, 2015

      3 Hong Juhee, "Seismic performance evaluation of MRF building structures retrofitted using VES30 damper systems" Sejong University 2016

      4 "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. ATC-40"

      5 Yi YS, "Seismic Performance Evaluation of Shear Wall Retrofitted with FRP" 2013

      6 Korean Educational Development Institute, "Seismic Performance Evaluation and Seismic Retrofit Guidelines for School Structures"

      7 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Seismic Performance Evaluation Method of Existing Structures" 2011

      8 Ministry of Construction & Transportation, "Seismic Design Criteria Research(Ⅱ)" 1997

      9 "Prestandard and Comnmentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings(FEMA 356)"

      10 National Emergency Management Agency, "Guidelines for evaluation of seismic performance of buildings"

      11 Federal Emergency Management Agency, "FEMA-P965. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors"

      12 Architectural Institute of Korea, "Architectural Structure Design Standards and Commentary"

      13 Architectural Institute of Korea, "Architectural Structure Design Standards and Commentary"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.48 0.48 0.44
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.39 0.35 0.664 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼