Does the literature have anything to do with the "Knowledge"? This paper would give an affirmative answer about that question, though in an unusual sense. We will examine firstly some characteristic attributes of literature language. Of which we bring...
Does the literature have anything to do with the "Knowledge"? This paper would give an affirmative answer about that question, though in an unusual sense. We will examine firstly some characteristic attributes of literature language. Of which we bring focus into this proposition: the literature is a "research" of the language; by which it arrives paradoxically at the "Outside" of language. We will consider some examples such as M. Blanchot's thesis on double fold negation of language, S. Malarme's Sonnet, Lee Seong Bock's poet on "Mara" and an aphorism on Maria. Those examples lead us to an assumption the literature has a tendency to develop a different language getting out of reference-object and conceptualization. We call that kind of language as "non-language" in this paper. Because it does not serve the "Thought" as the referential language in general, but serves the Reality of language itself. By doing so the "non-language" free the "subjects", the writers and language itself. Then what would be the relation between literature and pure "Realitytle Reel)"? The latter does not exist as a "thing" because any language is not susceptible to describe it as "thing". It exist only in a negative way. Likewise the literature participate in the "knowledge" in a negative way consisting on an affirmation of "limit" or "impossibility" of language in describing pure "Reality". But this affirmation permits an another affirmation of infinite writing in accordance with the Desire of language. Where the writing can remain in the "Truth".