이혼으로 인한 재산분할에 있어서 분할자의 채권자보호에 관한 몇 가지 提言

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

If the couple divorced, the couples one-sided against the other party, can claim the property division. However, in the perspective of creditors, due to the accidental circumstances―divorce and property division of the debtor―the debtors responsibility property will unexpectedly reduced. Therefore, there is need to discuss if the revocation by a creditor can be exercised for the property division at divorce.
In this article, if the insolvent debtor split the property at divorce in order to avoid enforcement, I will examine the effects of the Divorce and property division. In particular, if couples, splitting the property subject to a divorce, in fact, do not get divorced, there is need to explore creditor protection measures.
In addition, some precedent decide the alimony is included in the property division in determining whether the property division at divorce is fraudulent act. However, there is doubt about its validity.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 田慶根, "離婚에 따른 財産分割과 詐害行爲取消" 韓國家族法學會 (13) : 233-266, 1999

2 朴東涉, "친족상속법" 博英社 2009

3 홍성재, "민법총칙" 도서출판 대영문화사 2005

4 송덕수, "공통의 동기의 착오에 관한 판례 연구- 대법원 2006. 11. 23. 선고 2005다13288 판결 -" 법조협회 58 (58): 334-383, 2009

5 이경희, "가족법판례해설" 세창출판사 2009

6 李祥敏, "財産分割이 詐害行爲取消의 對象이 되는지 與否, In 民事判例硏究[XXIV] : 心堂 宋相現會長 華甲紀念" 民事判例硏究會 199-230, 2002

7 閔裕淑, "財産分割의 具體的 認定範圍" 62 : 401-448, 1993

8 李東遠, "財産分割과 詐害行爲" 大邱判例硏究會 9 : 373-390, 2000

9 木幡文德, "講說民法(親族法·相續法)" 不磨書房 1999

10 金淑子, "親族間의 財産行爲와 債權者取消權" 博英社 73-87, 1990

11 裵慶淑, "親族相續法講義" 第一法規 2006

12 金容漢, "親族相續法" 博英社 2004

13 金疇洙, "親族相續法" 法文社 2011

14 "注釈民法(21)" 有斐閣 1975

15 백경일, "民法總則要義" 리슈미디어 2011

16 李英俊, "民法總則" 博英社 2007

17 金曾漢, "民法總則" 博英社 2001

18 郭潤直, "民法總則" 博英社 2007

19 金相容, "民法總則" 화산미디어 2009

20 "民法注解[Ⅲ]" 博英社 1992

21 "民法注解[Ⅱ]" 博英社 1992

22 宋德洙, "新民法講義" 博英社 2011

23 李庚熙, "家族法" 法元社 2008

24 朴秉濠, "家族法" 韓國放送通信大學 1999

25 尹眞秀, "2006년 주요 民法 관련 판례 회고" 48 (48): 371-349,