RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전략 자산으로서의 지리적 표시: 경제·문화·규범 차원에서 본 한국 GI 정책 분석 = Geographical Indications as a Strategic Asset: An Economic, Cultural, and Normative Analysis of Korea’s GI Policy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110235095

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Geographical indications (GI) are an intellectual property regime linking regional characteristics to product quality and have traditionally been regarded as an economic asset. Recently, however, GI has evolved beyond trade negotiations into the domain of cultural diplomacy, becoming intertwined with cultural identity and national image, while also functioning as an arena for international normative competition over protection standards.
    This study conceptualizes GI as a composite agenda of intersecting economic interests, cultural identity, and normative order, and examines the implications and limitations of Korea's GI policy in trade negotiations and cultural diplomacy. It reviews the divergent GI strategies of the EU, the United States, and emerging economies under the WTO-TRIPS regime, and empirically analyzes how GI functions as both a trade asset and as a culturally charged international issue by examining the Korea–EU FTA negotiations and the kimchi origin dispute.
    The analysis reveals that competition over GI contributes to the formation of international normative judgments on legitimate protection systems, whereas Korea's strategic use remains constrained by fragmented governance and reactive policy approaches. The study proposes policy directions for managing GI as an integrated asset combining economic, cultural, and normative dimensions.
    번역하기

    Geographical indications (GI) are an intellectual property regime linking regional characteristics to product quality and have traditionally been regarded as an economic asset. Recently, however, GI has evolved beyond trade negotiations into the domai...

    Geographical indications (GI) are an intellectual property regime linking regional characteristics to product quality and have traditionally been regarded as an economic asset. Recently, however, GI has evolved beyond trade negotiations into the domain of cultural diplomacy, becoming intertwined with cultural identity and national image, while also functioning as an arena for international normative competition over protection standards.
    This study conceptualizes GI as a composite agenda of intersecting economic interests, cultural identity, and normative order, and examines the implications and limitations of Korea's GI policy in trade negotiations and cultural diplomacy. It reviews the divergent GI strategies of the EU, the United States, and emerging economies under the WTO-TRIPS regime, and empirically analyzes how GI functions as both a trade asset and as a culturally charged international issue by examining the Korea–EU FTA negotiations and the kimchi origin dispute.
    The analysis reveals that competition over GI contributes to the formation of international normative judgments on legitimate protection systems, whereas Korea's strategic use remains constrained by fragmented governance and reactive policy approaches. The study proposes policy directions for managing GI as an integrated asset combining economic, cultural, and normative dimensions.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼