This paper tried to interpretate the intrinsic role of `-eoha-`, in view of substantial use of language. We showed that intrinsic roles of `-eoha-` have close relation to `na`, speaker that is first pronoun at usual communication state. Na who is expe...
This paper tried to interpretate the intrinsic role of `-eoha-`, in view of substantial use of language. We showed that intrinsic roles of `-eoha-` have close relation to `na`, speaker that is first pronoun at usual communication state. Na who is experiencer at the emotion-sense construction, is interpreted into `object`, when `-eoha-` attaches to the emotion-sense construction. It is reason why non-`-eoha-` attachment expression require a condition that experiencer and speaker must be coreference, on the other hand, `-eoha-` attachment expression require a condition that experiencer and speaker must not be coreference. It is `-eoha-` attachment expression that speaker objectfy himself and speaks his own emotion and sense. So, it is concluded when speaker speak himself as objectified one, `-eoha-` attachment expression is more natural than non-`-eoha-` attachment expression. This is reason why `-eoha-` attachment expression can be changed into an interrogative, even if experiencer is first pronoun `seosi` that is poet written by Yun, Dongju. Most readers understand that na in `-eoha-` attachment expression is more afflicted at wind in the leaves than in na in non`-eoha-` attachment expression. This reason is that poet expressed his feeling objectively, not restricting inside his own soul.