1. Objective of study
The Project Base System(PBS) by Korean Government was introduced as a value-based system for planning, making-up, distribution, and contract of research funds of national research and development projects. The system has been ev...
1. Objective of study
The Project Base System(PBS) by Korean Government was introduced as a value-based system for planning, making-up, distribution, and contract of research funds of national research and development projects. The system has been evaluated as one of the best alternatives among various systems that had been tried, so far. However, the majority of researchers do not believe that it does not reflect well the reality of present national R&D system. Therefore an in-depth re-evaluation of current PBS became necessary.
The objective of this study is to derive effective improvement methods through analyzing introduction and enforcement of PBS, its influence on management of Government-Supported Research Institutes("GSRIs"), and researcher's thoughts about the system.
2. Method of Study
In order to develop the study, the analysis of actual condition was performed and the analysis method was deivided into two fields ; one is a numerical analysis through the survey of some economic indexes, and the other is a qualitative analysis through individaul interviewing(including telephone interviewing) with some researchers of several GSRIs.
A numerical analysis is to understand the influence of PBS on GSRIs through changes of research funds, personnel composition, income and expenditure, etc. The data for this analysis were collected through budget bill, a find sttlement report, an audit report of GSPIs, and related policy reports. etc.
A qualitative analysis is to underdtand the thoughts that researchers in the front line feel on PBS. This analysis is useful to recognize the problems with which PBS is confronted and to supplement the numerical analysis method which may bring incorrect results. Direction of interviewing is divided into five fields and each major field consists of detailed items.
The measurement field are as the followings ;
1) degree of recognition about PBS,
2) researchers' attitude about total cost system of PBS,
3) researchers' attitude on project investigator and project oriented system of PBS,
4) problems of current PBS that researchers feel,
5) researchers' attitude on the government policy.
The results of the interviewing show that not only excellency of the system itself byt also researchers' acceptance attitude about the system are very important for effective realization of PBS.
3. Analysis of Actual Condition
The results of above mentioned analysis are summarized as follows;
1) An introduction of PBS has strengthened the competitive power of insititutes more than previously,
2) As the weight of the institute's native prohects become reduced, researchers bdcome more uneasy and th management direction of institute became uncertain,
3) Excessive competition for acceptance of projects worsened the quality of the research results,
4) Absence of consistency of the government policy deprived self-motivated will of researchers and resulted in great confusion,(e.g. yearly change of estimating method for overhead rate, frequent alterations of the science and techology policy, and etc.)
5) Relative decrease of institute's native project funds, increase of researcher personnels in contrast to support personnels, reducing of overhead costs in all institutes, and etc.
6) Researchers answered favorably about PBS system itself and its introduction intention. But they showed a cool attitude on other main aspects of the interviewed subjects.
As mentioned above, most researcher answere negatively about questions. This result shows that the study is proving the validity of the purpose.
4. Effective Realization Methods of PBS
On the basis of the analysis results, this study suggests effective realization methods of PBS as follows ;
1) applicationa of overhead rate by GSRI's native characteristics,
2) relaxatio of restricted paricipation rate of each resercher,
3) through enforcement of research contract system and yearly pay system,
4) systematic construction of MIS in GSRIs,
5) steady support of the GSRI's native project costs,
6) Consistent fulfillemtnt of government policy,
7) endeavor to enlargement of trust projects from company except for government.
Although many improvement methods were suggested, a successful enforcement of PBS can't be guaranteed unless researchers' negative attitudes against the system would be changed to favorable stance. So, an active promotion of PBS by institute and government is shown to have absolute importance.
5. Conculsion
If PBS and circumstances around the system are improved by utilizing findings of the study, the management efficiency of GSRIs will be enhanced and the motivation for study of researchers will be raised.
Above all, this study would contribute to effective distribution of the limited national R&D budgets.