저항의 담론과 <오적(五賊)> = The Discourse of 'Resistance' and <O-jeok>

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The attempt that determines the meaning of ‘resistance’ in the space of discourse don't use the text of literature as an implement in analyzing of society. The literary sociology in 80's is the method of analyze that emphasize an angle of the reflection theory in literary production. But the analysis of discourse in a literary text is a work of defining the sociality of language. Faucault gave his attentions to a distinctive feature of a literature that refined and excluded a special text as a literature or non-literature. He focused that system and structure in literary production. He thought the function of literature was a self-technique. In his point of view, the practical feature of literature that ignore a social standard and violate a social convention is the important factor that define a phase of an author. The attempt that analyze the literature of ‘Kim Ji-ha’ in the point of ‘resistance’ searches a special feature of ‘resistance’. That attempt searches the relationship between Power and literature.The discourse of modernization and ideology is a representation in the literature in 70's and the way of existence in the literature of ‘Kim Ji-ha’. His theory of popular literature presented a direction of popular literature in 80's. But that presentation preserved a concept of people that based on reality in 70's. not a concept of people in the development of Marxist history. His literature deposits on a past and his ‘resistance’ cover the future with present. In that way, his literature explains the existence of literature. In the space of discourse, analyzing his phase of literature is very useful. Because it can overcome the breaking theory of connections in 80's and explains his literature in a absolute paradigm.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 민음사, "지식의 고고학" 1992

2 황정산, "주변에서 글쓰기" 하늘연못 2000

3 최동호, "정신주의 시와 사상" 민음사 1995

4 고현철, "장르 패로디로 본 김지하의 ‘오적’" 1993

5 푸 코, "자기의 테크놀로지" 동문선 1997

6 김정식, "운동매체로서의 문학예술의 표현방식" 경희대학교 1986

7 양건열, "비판적 대중문화론" 현대미학사 1997

8 크리스테바, "반항의 의미와 무의미" 푸른숲 1998

9 손호철, "박정희 정권의 정치적 성격" (23) : 1993

10 김대환, "박정희 정권 경제개발-신화와 현실" (23) : 1993

11 백낙청, "박정희 시대를 어떻게 생각할까" 창작과 비평사 (128) : 2005

12 이태숙, "문화와 섹슈얼리티" 예림기획 2004

13 국정홍보처편, "대한민국 정부기록 사진집" 국정홍보처 ^제7권 : 2003

14 푸 코, "담론의 질서" 서강대학교 출판부 1998

15 이정우, "담론의 공간" 산해 2000

16 임동확, "김지하 시연구" 전남대학교 대학원 2000

17 홍용희, "김지하 문학연구" 시와 시학사 2000

18 그람시, "그람시의 옥중수고Ⅰ" 거름 1999

19 강우식, "‘오적’에 관한 몇 가지 단견" 성균관대학교 인문과학연구소 2002