탄천 이용자의 인식조사를 통한 생태계서비스의 트레이드오프 관계 고찰 = A Study of Ecosystem Services Trade-off based on user Perception in Tancheon

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Report was published in 2005, the conflict between development and the preservation of the ecological environment has turned to paying attention to value assessments in rational decision-making. In recent years, the concept of ecosystem services has been recognized as a viable one for making significant decisions. However, a trade-off between increase and decrease occurs between the ecosystem services sub-categories (cultural service, regulating service, supporting service, and provisioning service), for which research centering on target sites is needed. To this end, the present study aims to investigate the trade-off relationship between service categories to search for reasonable decision-making strategies. As the research method, a survey was conducted using the translated version of SoIVES(Social Value for Ecosystem Services) 3.0 questionnaire of the United States Geological Survey. The research findings demonstrate the economic value, based on the derived monetary value of each service category, the economic value of the target site was compared among landscape aesthetic value 8,050,000 won, recreation value 6,750,000 won, biodiversity value 4,610,000won, healing value 3,970,000 won, life-sustaining value 2,090,000 won, and productive value 220,000 won. And then the primarily recognized value criteria of the Tancheon ecosystem services illustrate landscape aesthetic and recreation value. Besides, this study illustrates visualized trade-off relationships based on user perception, and the derived relations illustrate the trade-off relationship between the cultural service, regulating service, supporting service, and provisioning service, as well as relationships between the components of the sub-categories.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정은성, "하천유지유량을 이용한 일최대 오염허용부하량 산정 방안" 한국물환경학회 24 (24): 317-327, 2008

2 안소은, "하천 생태계서비스의 경제적 가치: 환경가치종합정보시스템(EVIS) 자료를 중심으로" 한국환경정책학회 22 (22): 27-54, 2014

3 구미현, "정책형성단계에서 생태계서비스에 관한 이론적 고찰" 한국환경복원기술학회 15 (15): 85-102, 2012

4 유승훈, "안성천 생태하천 복원의 경제적 편익" 한국지역학회 25 (25): 57-73, 2009

5 함은경, "시스템 사고를 통한 생태계서비스의 trade-off 관계 고찰" 한국시스템다이내믹스학회 16 (16): 75-100, 2015

6 전철현, "수질 악화로 인한 후생변화의 추정" 한국환경정책·평가연구원 9 (9): 135-155, 2010

7 임윤택, "도시 생태하천공원의 가치 추정" 한국지역개발학회 17 (17): 95-110, 2005

8 Emerton, L., "Value: Counting ecosystems as water infrastructure" Iucn 2004

9 Lee, CS, "Valuation of water pollution by contingent valuation method : the study of Nam Dae Chun river in Kangnung province" Kangwon National University 2001

10 Shan Ma, "Valuation of ecosystem services from rural landscapes using agricultural land prices" Elsevier BV 70 (70): 1649-1659, 2011

11 "USGS (United States Geological Survey)"

12 Watson, R., "UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report" United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre 2011

13 Robert Costanza, "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital" Springer Nature 387 (387): 253-260, 1997

14 Rutz, D., "Socioeconomic impacts of bioenergy production" Springer Science & Business Media 2014

15 Moohan Kim, "Perspectives on the Direction of the Suncheon Bay National Garden from Local Residents and Non-Local Visitors" MDPI AG 9 (9): 1832-, 2017

16 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, "Overview of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment" 2005

17 J. M. H. Knops, "Negative correlation does not imply a tradeoff between growth and reproduction in California oaks" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (104): 16982-16985, 2007

18 Hwang, SJ, "National Governmental Department Policy Direction for Healthy River Ecological Environmental Planning" 2 (2): 2-9, 2014

19 Harald Schaich, "Linking Ecosystem Services with Cultural Landscape Research" Oekom Publishers GmbH 19 (19): 269-277, 2010

20 Burkhard, B, "Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services-a concept for land-cover based assessments" 15 (15): 22-, 2009

21 Marion Kandziora, "Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—A theoretical matrix exercise" Elsevier BV 28 : 54-78, 2013

22 Tomscha S., "Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies misunderstood without landscape history" 21 (21): 2016

23 Turkelboom, F., "Ecosystem Service Trade-offs and Synergies" Open NESS Ecosystem Services Reference Book 2016

24 J.A. Tratalos, "Cultural ecosystem services in the UK: Lessons on designing indicators to inform management and policy" Elsevier BV 61 : 63-73, 2016

25 Judith M. Ament, "Cultural Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Understanding Bundles, Trade-Offs, and Synergies" Wiley 10 (10): 440-450, 2017

26 Jung, M, "Comparative Study on Proximity Effects in Welfare Change from Water Contamination" Kangwon National University 2010

27 Ken J. Wallace, "Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions" Elsevier BV 139 (139): 235-246, 2007