RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      검정간격의 유량을 보정하기 위한 한국종축개량협회 계수와 미국농무부 계수의 정확도 비교 = Comparing Accuracy of KAIA Factors with USDA Factors for Adjusting Test - interval Milk Yields

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3312530

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this research was to compare accuracy of Korea Animal Improvement Association (KAIA) factors with USDA factors for adjusting test-interval milk (TIM) yields. Data used in this analysis were 721 lactation records with 305 daily milk yields. When test-interval yields adjusted by KAIA factors and by USDA factors were compared with actual yields, by stage of lactation, USDA factors could reduce bias of TIM yields from actual yields more effetively than KAIA factors all in the first. second, and last test intervals. When test days of individual record were randomly chosen at 26 to 34 day intervals, bias of TIM yields from actual yield was largest in the first test interval(78.5㎏ for first lactation and 94.0㎏ for later lactations), the second test interval( -20.0㎏ and -22.6㎏), and the interval after last test-day(10.9㎏ and 15.0㎏). The bias wasn`t reduced reasonably in the TIM yields adjusted by KAIA factors in any test interval whereas the amount of bias in the yields adjusted by USDA factors was reduced effectively in all of the three test intervals. Sampling errors of test interval yields adjusted by USDA factors were equal to or smaller than ones adjusted by KAIA factors.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this research was to compare accuracy of Korea Animal Improvement Association (KAIA) factors with USDA factors for adjusting test-interval milk (TIM) yields. Data used in this analysis were 721 lactation records with 305 daily milk yiel...

      The purpose of this research was to compare accuracy of Korea Animal Improvement Association (KAIA) factors with USDA factors for adjusting test-interval milk (TIM) yields. Data used in this analysis were 721 lactation records with 305 daily milk yields. When test-interval yields adjusted by KAIA factors and by USDA factors were compared with actual yields, by stage of lactation, USDA factors could reduce bias of TIM yields from actual yields more effetively than KAIA factors all in the first. second, and last test intervals. When test days of individual record were randomly chosen at 26 to 34 day intervals, bias of TIM yields from actual yield was largest in the first test interval(78.5㎏ for first lactation and 94.0㎏ for later lactations), the second test interval( -20.0㎏ and -22.6㎏), and the interval after last test-day(10.9㎏ and 15.0㎏). The bias wasn`t reduced reasonably in the TIM yields adjusted by KAIA factors in any test interval whereas the amount of bias in the yields adjusted by USDA factors was reduced effectively in all of the three test intervals. Sampling errors of test interval yields adjusted by USDA factors were equal to or smaller than ones adjusted by KAIA factors.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼