This study aimed to inquiry unfolding aspect of proletarian children’s literature criticism after 1920’s. It is examinate series criticism argument through overall flow of children’s literature criticism history. Actually, diachronic flow of Kor...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82666762
2008
Korean
809
KCI등재
학술저널
133-165(33쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study aimed to inquiry unfolding aspect of proletarian children’s literature criticism after 1920’s. It is examinate series criticism argument through overall flow of children’s literature criticism history. Actually, diachronic flow of Kor...
This study aimed to inquiry unfolding aspect of proletarian children’s literature criticism after 1920’s. It is examinate series criticism argument through overall flow of children’s literature criticism history. Actually, diachronic flow of Korean modern children’s literature criticism have jumped through series criticism dispute. So, arrangement work about overall flow and criticism historical meaning of children’s literature criticism dispute is necessary recent task.
As a matter of fact, dominant viewpoint not admit rigid children’s literature criticism and discussion in the modern age. It deny to merit of Proletarian criticism and reference its mistake. But, Korean modern literary criticism have subjectivity in the KAPF age. Dispute process of modern children’s literature criticism naturally evoked generation and development of criticism genre. So, pervious prejudice have to conquer that proletarian children’s literature criticism is simple blame logic. Children’s literature historical task that conquer division logic have being delayed.
Proletarian children’s literature criticism is based to fixed opinion and concentrate on reality conflict and social consciousness. But it argue role of children’s literature that express painful working children. And, it has achievement pass over subjective essay criticism. It contribute to establishment genre characteristic through logical and objective description. Specially, nationalism interrelationship criticism against proletarian criticism is not exist. Accordingly, diachronic flow of proletarian children’s literature criticism to the 1930’s waiting to follow-up study.
목차 (Table of Contents)
방정환의 동화론 「새로 開拓되는 童話에 關하야」에 대한 고찰