RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    1920년대 계급주의 아동문학 비평 연구  :  소년문예운동 방향전환론의 전개와 비평사적 의미 = A Study on 1920’s Proletarian Children’s Literature Criticism -direction conversion discussion of juvenile literary movement and critical meaning

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aimed to inquiry unfolding aspect of proletarian children’s literature criticism after 1920’s. It is examinate series criticism argument through overall flow of children’s literature criticism history. Actually, diachronic flow of Korean modern children’s literature criticism have jumped through series criticism dispute. So, arrangement work about overall flow and criticism historical meaning of children’s literature criticism dispute is necessary recent task.
    As a matter of fact, dominant viewpoint not admit rigid children’s literature criticism and discussion in the modern age. It deny to merit of Proletarian criticism and reference its mistake. But, Korean modern literary criticism have subjectivity in the KAPF age. Dispute process of modern children’s literature criticism naturally evoked generation and development of criticism genre. So, pervious prejudice have to conquer that proletarian children’s literature criticism is simple blame logic. Children’s literature historical task that conquer division logic have being delayed.
    Proletarian children’s literature criticism is based to fixed opinion and concentrate on reality conflict and social consciousness. But it argue role of children’s literature that express painful working children. And, it has achievement pass over subjective essay criticism. It contribute to establishment genre characteristic through logical and objective description. Specially, nationalism interrelationship criticism against proletarian criticism is not exist. Accordingly, diachronic flow of proletarian children’s literature criticism to the 1930’s waiting to follow-up study.
    번역하기

    This study aimed to inquiry unfolding aspect of proletarian children’s literature criticism after 1920’s. It is examinate series criticism argument through overall flow of children’s literature criticism history. Actually, diachronic flow of Kor...

    This study aimed to inquiry unfolding aspect of proletarian children’s literature criticism after 1920’s. It is examinate series criticism argument through overall flow of children’s literature criticism history. Actually, diachronic flow of Korean modern children’s literature criticism have jumped through series criticism dispute. So, arrangement work about overall flow and criticism historical meaning of children’s literature criticism dispute is necessary recent task.
    As a matter of fact, dominant viewpoint not admit rigid children’s literature criticism and discussion in the modern age. It deny to merit of Proletarian criticism and reference its mistake. But, Korean modern literary criticism have subjectivity in the KAPF age. Dispute process of modern children’s literature criticism naturally evoked generation and development of criticism genre. So, pervious prejudice have to conquer that proletarian children’s literature criticism is simple blame logic. Children’s literature historical task that conquer division logic have being delayed.
    Proletarian children’s literature criticism is based to fixed opinion and concentrate on reality conflict and social consciousness. But it argue role of children’s literature that express painful working children. And, it has achievement pass over subjective essay criticism. It contribute to establishment genre characteristic through logical and objective description. Specially, nationalism interrelationship criticism against proletarian criticism is not exist. Accordingly, diachronic flow of proletarian children’s literature criticism to the 1930’s waiting to follow-up study.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 계급주의 아동문학과 비평 연구의 현 단계
    • Ⅱ. 계급문학 출현의 전조(前兆)와 초기 아동문학 비평의 흐름
    • Ⅲ. 소년문예운동 방향전환론의 대두와 전개
    • Ⅳ. 계급주의 아동문학 비평의 공과(功過)와 계급문학을 보는 시선 확립
    • 참고문헌
    • Ⅰ. 계급주의 아동문학과 비평 연구의 현 단계
    • Ⅱ. 계급문학 출현의 전조(前兆)와 초기 아동문학 비평의 흐름
    • Ⅲ. 소년문예운동 방향전환론의 대두와 전개
    • Ⅳ. 계급주의 아동문학 비평의 공과(功過)와 계급문학을 보는 시선 확립
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼