구성적 처리와 인지욕구가 반응양식에 따른 상표의 선호반전에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Constructive Processes and Need for Cognition on Preference Reversals in Response Mode

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigated the effects of constructive processes and need for cognition on preference reversals in judgment and choice tasks. The experimental design was 2(degree of constructive processes: low/high) × 2(need for cognition: low/high) completely randomized factorial design. The results showed that first, in the familiar product, subjects in high constructive processes condition had higher rate in preference reversals in response mode than in low constructive processes condition. Second, in the familiar product, subjects who had high need for cognition did not show significant difference in preference reversals in response mode between low and high level of constructive processes. Third, in the familiar product, subjects who had low need for cognition showed significant difference in preference reversals in response mode between low and high level of constructive processes. However, in the unfamiliar product, all of the points mentioned above were not significant. In addition, subjects in high constructive processes condition showed significant difference in consideration of attribute importance in response mode. Also, when preference reversals happened, difference in consideration of attribute importance in response mode is significant.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 구성적 처리수준과 판단 및 선택이라는 반응양식에 따른 선호반전의 발생에 대한 관계를 검증해보고, 아울러 구성적 처리와 함께 인지욕구라는 개인차 변수가 반응양식에 따른 선호반전에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 실험결과, 친숙 제품의 경우 구성적 처리가 낮은 조건에서보다 높은 조건에서 반응양식에 따른 선호반전이 유의하게 더 많이 발생하였으나, 비친숙 제품에서는 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 또한 친숙한 제품의 경우, 인지욕구가 높은 집단에서는 구성적 처리의 각 수준에서 반응양식에 따른 선호반전 발생이 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았으나, 인지욕구가 낮은 집단에서는 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 그러나 이러한 결과 또한 비친숙 제품에서는 발견되지 않았다. 추가적으로 판단 및 선택과제에서 고려한 속성중요도 척도에 대한 응답을 분석한 결과, 친숙 제품과 비친숙 제품 모두에서 구성적 처리가 낮은 조건에서보다 높은 조건에서 반응양식에 따른 속성중요도의 차이가 크게 나타났고, 선호반전이 발생한 경우가 발생하지 않은 경우에 비해 반응양식에 따른 속성중요도에서 큰 차이를 보였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김완석, "한국형 인지욕구척도 개발연구" 7 (7): 87-101, 1994

2 양윤, "인지욕구와 자기감시가 제품속성에 대한반응시간에 미치는 영향" 한국소비자·광고심리학회 4 (4): 25-40, 2003

3 이유재, "아는 것이 힘? 사전 지식이 평가모드에 따른 선호역전에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구" 한국경영학회 33 (33): 3-3, 2004

4 양윤, "소비자는 제품정보를 평균내는가? 가산하는가?: 가중치 교환과정을 중심으로" 11 (11): 71-83, 1998

5 양윤, "상표명, 사전지식, 반응양식이 소비자 정보회상에 미치는 영향" 한국방송광고공사 (67) : 85-108, 2005

6 Cacioppo, J. T., "The need for cognition" 42 : 116-131, 1982

7 Zhang, J., "The majority rule in individual decision making" 99 : 102-111, 2006

8 Hsee, C. K., "The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives" 67 (67): 247-257, 1996

9 Billings, R. S., "The Effects of Response Mode and Importance on Decision-Making Strategies: Judgment versus Choice" 41 : 3-29, 1988

10 Fischer. G. W., "Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect" 19 : 580-597, 1993

11 Baile, J. R., "Sequential Phase of Judgment and the Value Representation of Product Alternatives" 21 : 437-441, 1994

12 Bazerman, M. H., "Reversals of Preference in Allocation Decision: Judging an Alternative versus Choosing among Alternatives" 37 : 220-240, 1992

13 Lichtenstein, S., "Reversal of Preference Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions" 89 : 46-55, 1971

14 Westenberg, M. R. M., "Response Modes, Decision Processes and Decision Outcomes" 80 : 169-184, 1992

15 Tversky, A., "Rational choice and the framing of decision" 59 : 251-278, 1986

16 Inman, J. J., "Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut?" 17 : 74-81, 1990

17 Coupey, E., "Product category familiarity and preference construction" 24 : 459-468, 1998

18 Haugtvedt, C. P., "Personality and ad effectiveness: Exploring the utility of need for cognition" 15 : 209-212, 1988

19 Sood, S., "On self- referencing differences in judgment and choice" 98 : 144-154, 2005

20 Kahneman, D., "Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives" 93 : 136-153, 1986

21 Haugtvedt, C. P., "Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior" 1 (1): 239-260, 1992

22 Fedorikhin, A., "Mood effects on Attitudes, perceived risk and choice : Moderators and Mediators" 14 (14): 2-12, 2004

23 Wedell, D. H., "Looking and Weighting in judgment and choice" 70 (70): 41-64, 1997

24 Jacoby, J., "Information acquisition behavior in brand choice situations" 3 : 209-216, 1977

25 Senter, S. M., "Information Presentation constraints and the adaptive decision maker hypothesis" 25 (25): 426-446, 1999

26 Ritov, I., "How People value the environment? Environment, Ethics, and Behavior" New Lexington Press 1997

27 Goldstein, W. M., "Expression Theory and the Preference Reversal Phenomenal" 94 : 236-254, 1987

28 Kahneman, D., "Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem" 98 : 1325-1348, 1990

29 Tversky, A., "Endowment and contrasts in judgments of well-being, In An interdisciplinary perspective(21)" Pergamon Press 1991

30 Troutman, C. M., "Do consumers evaluate products by adding or averaging attribute information?" 3 : 101-106, 1976

31 Tversky, A., "Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice" 95 : 371-384, 1988

32 Bettman, J. R., "Constructive process in consumer choice" 4 : 75-85, 1977

33 Bettman, J. R., "Constructive consumer choice processes" 25 : 187-217, 1998

34 Schkade, D. A., "Cognitive Processes in Preference Reversal" 44 : 203-231, 1989

35 Shafir, E., "Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others" 21 : 546-556, 1993

36 Payne, J. W., "Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective" 43 : 87-131, 1992

37 Einhorn, H. J., "Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice" 32 : 53-88, 1981

38 Nowlis, M. S., "Attribute- Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals" 205-218, 1997