‘국가’와 ‘수신’, 1890년대 독본의 두 가지 양상 - ≪국민소학독본≫과 ≪신정심상소학≫을 중심으로 = ‘Nation’ and ‘Moral training’, Two Aspects of the Reading Books in 1890s. - Focus on Gukminsohakdokbon and Sinjungsimsangsohak

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this essay is to review the contents of the Gukminsohakdokbon and Sinjungsimsangsohak. Based on reviewing the contents, this essay will examine the difference of two reading books and cause of the difference.
Gukminsohakdokbon was the reading book reflected the fundamentals of keeping the nation and practicalities. Though it was narrated from a Western point of view, it expressed the clear purpose of the mighty nation by naming each individual as the people. On the other hand, Sinjungsimsangsohak was the reading book reflected individual moral training. Two reading books were distinguished though an short interval of five months.
The difference between two reading books was the result of the difference between the time. Gukminsohakdokbon was published rather freely but Sinjungsimsangsohak was published in interference from Japan. Since then, the formation of knowledge discourse was based on Gukminsohakdokbon' nation and Gukminsohakdokbon' moral traing in the period of enlightenment.
This essay was the process of quest for the orgin of knowledge in the period of enlightenment and considering the diversity in the readings books in 1890s.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this essay is to review the contents of the Gukminsohakdokbon and Sinjungsimsangsohak. Based on reviewing the contents, this essay will examine the difference of two reading books and cause of the difference.
Gukminsohakdokbon was the reading book reflected the fundamentals of keeping the nation and practicalities. Though it was narrated from a Western point of view, it expressed the clear purpose of the mighty nation by naming each individual as the people. On the other hand, Sinjungsimsangsohak was the reading book reflected individual moral training. Two reading books were distinguished though an short interval of five months.
The difference between two reading books was the result of the difference between the time. Gukminsohakdokbon was published rather freely but Sinjungsimsangsohak was published in interference from Japan. Since then, the formation of knowledge discourse was based on Gukminsohakdokbon' nation and Gukminsohakdokbon' moral traing in the period of enlightenment.
This essay was the process of quest for the orgin of knowledge in the period of enlightenment and considering the diversity in the readings books in 1890s.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 유방란, "한국근대교육의 등장과 발달" 서울대 1995

2 손인수, "한국개화교육연구" 일지사 1980

3 이승원, "학교의 탄생" 휴머니스트 2005

4 박종근, "청일전쟁과 조선" 일조각 1989

5 "신정심상소학" 아세아문화사 1977

6 "소학교령. 1895. 7. 22"

7 "소학교교칙대강. 1895. 8. 15"

8 구자황, "독본을 통해 본 근대적 텍스트의 형성과 변화 in: 한국 근대문학의 형성과 문학 장의 재발견" 소명출판사 2004

9 전용호, "근대 지식 개념의 형성과 <국민소학독본>" 우리어문학회 (25) : 243-264, 2005

10 "국민소학독본" 아세아문화사 1977

11 "교육조서. 1895. 2. 2"

12 유영익, "갑오경장연구" 일조각 1990

13 왕현종, "갑오개혁의 쟁점과 역사적 교훈" (11) : 2002

14 주진오, "갑오개혁의 새로운 이해" (가을) : 1994

15 조정규, "갑오개혁의 개혁내용과 주체세력의 분석" 한국동북아학회 12 : 1999

16 신용하, "갑오개혁과 독립협회운동의 사회사" 서울대학교출판부 2001

17 김소영, "甲午改革期(1894∼1895) 敎科書 속의 ‘國民’" 고려사학회 (29) : 171-208, 2007