RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      커뮤니티 웰빙의 다면적 주관적 인식 및 객관적 조건과 비교 = Two Faceted Perceptions of Community Wellbeing In Juxtaposition With Objective Conditions

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100267844

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper we a) analyze two-faceted perceptions of community wellbeing, specifically personal satisfaction and local evaluation, and then b) connect this analysis to the objective conditions of local communities. This exploration illuminates the relationship between subjective community wellbeing and objective community wellbeing Data are collected from about 1000 residents across six municipalities in Seoul: Kangnam, Guro, Mapo, Dongdaemun, Junggu-Jongro. The survey results showed that in Guro and Dongdaemun, personal satisfaction was higher than local evaluation, while the opposite tendency was observed in Kangnam, where local evaluation was higher than personal satisfaction. Other findings include a substantial discrepancy between subjective community wellbeing and objective community wellbeing. Further study is needed to elucidate the relationship between these conceptions and contribute to a more sophisticated theorization of community wellbeing research.
      번역하기

      In this paper we a) analyze two-faceted perceptions of community wellbeing, specifically personal satisfaction and local evaluation, and then b) connect this analysis to the objective conditions of local communities. This exploration illuminates the r...

      In this paper we a) analyze two-faceted perceptions of community wellbeing, specifically personal satisfaction and local evaluation, and then b) connect this analysis to the objective conditions of local communities. This exploration illuminates the relationship between subjective community wellbeing and objective community wellbeing Data are collected from about 1000 residents across six municipalities in Seoul: Kangnam, Guro, Mapo, Dongdaemun, Junggu-Jongro. The survey results showed that in Guro and Dongdaemun, personal satisfaction was higher than local evaluation, while the opposite tendency was observed in Kangnam, where local evaluation was higher than personal satisfaction. Other findings include a substantial discrepancy between subjective community wellbeing and objective community wellbeing. Further study is needed to elucidate the relationship between these conceptions and contribute to a more sophisticated theorization of community wellbeing research.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이승종, "커뮤니티웰빙 지표에 대한 공무원과 전문가의 평가비교연구: AHP 기법의 적용" 한국행정학회 47 (47): 313-337, 2013

      2 기영화, "커뮤니티웰빙 연구를 위한 국제지표 분석: 한국적 함의의 도출" 빈곤문제국제개발연구원 22 (22): 1-35, 2013

      3 "서울 통계"

      4 Easterlin, R, "Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?" 27 : 35-47, 1995

      5 Cummins, R. A, "The second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction'" 35 : 179-200, 1998

      6 Kim, Y, "The development and application of a community wellbeing index in Korean metropolitan cities" 1-26, 2013

      7 Christakopoulou, S, "The community well-being questionnaire: Theoretical context and initial assessment of its reliability and validity" 56 : 321-351, 2001

      8 "Sustainable Seattle"

      9 Hooghe, M, "Subjective Well-Being and Social Capital in Belgian Communities: The Impact of Community Characteristics on Subjective Well-Being Indicators in Belgium" 100 (100): 17-36, 2011

      10 Lazar, R, "Subject in first person-Subject in third person: Subject, subjectivity, and intersubjectivity" 61 (61): 271-291, 2001

      1 이승종, "커뮤니티웰빙 지표에 대한 공무원과 전문가의 평가비교연구: AHP 기법의 적용" 한국행정학회 47 (47): 313-337, 2013

      2 기영화, "커뮤니티웰빙 연구를 위한 국제지표 분석: 한국적 함의의 도출" 빈곤문제국제개발연구원 22 (22): 1-35, 2013

      3 "서울 통계"

      4 Easterlin, R, "Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?" 27 : 35-47, 1995

      5 Cummins, R. A, "The second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction'" 35 : 179-200, 1998

      6 Kim, Y, "The development and application of a community wellbeing index in Korean metropolitan cities" 1-26, 2013

      7 Christakopoulou, S, "The community well-being questionnaire: Theoretical context and initial assessment of its reliability and validity" 56 : 321-351, 2001

      8 "Sustainable Seattle"

      9 Hooghe, M, "Subjective Well-Being and Social Capital in Belgian Communities: The Impact of Community Characteristics on Subjective Well-Being Indicators in Belgium" 100 (100): 17-36, 2011

      10 Lazar, R, "Subject in first person-Subject in third person: Subject, subjectivity, and intersubjectivity" 61 (61): 271-291, 2001

      11 Prilleltensky, I, "Promoting Well-Being" John Wiley &Sons, Inc 2006

      12 Ryan, R. M, "On happiness and human potential: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being" 52 : 141-166, 2001

      13 Easterlin, R. A, "Nations and households in economic growth" Stanford University Press 98-125, 1974

      14 Swain, D, "Measuring Progress: Community Indicators and the Quality of Life" 26 (26): 789-796, 2003

      15 "Jacksonville Community Council Inc. Quality of Life"

      16 Wolf, A, "Intersubjective concepts and measures of wellbeing for public policy"

      17 Cummins, R. A, "Develpoing a national index of subjective wellbeing : The Austrailian Unity Wellbeing Index" 64 (64): 160-190, 2003

      18 Sirgy, M, "Developing a Measure of Community Well-Being Based on Perceptions of Impact in Various Life Domains" 96 (96): 295-311, 2010

      19 Cuthill, M, "Coolangatta : A portrait of community well-being" 20 (20): 187-203, 2002

      20 Wiseman, J, "Community Wellbeing in an Unwell World : Trends, Challenges, and Possibilities" 29 (29): 353-366, 2008

      21 "Community Indicators Victoria"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-09-06 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Reasearch Institute for Local Administration -> Korea Research Institute for Local Administration KCI등재후보
      2005-09-06 학술지등록 한글명 : 지방행정연구
      외국어명 : The Korea Local Administration Review
      KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.21 1.21 1.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.09 1.07 1.285 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼