RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정신장애인의 자립생활(Self-Determined Living) 적응 경험에 관한 국내ㆍ국외 비교를 위한 메타에스노그래피 분석: 한국ㆍ미국ㆍ영국을 중심으로 = A Meta‑Ethnographic Analysis Comparing Domestic and International Adaptation Experiences of People with Psychiatric Disabilities in Self‑Determined Living: Focusing on Korea, the United States, and the United Kingdom

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109896887

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study conducted a meta‑ethnographic synthesis of 21 qualitative investigations published between January 2000 and December 2024 in Korea, the United States, and the United Kingdom that explored self‑determined living among people with mental illness. Applying Noblit and Hare’s seven‑step meta‑ethnography, we reciprocally translated participant narratives and re‑assembled themes, concepts, and metaphors. The synthesis identified five interlocking pillars that must operate simultaneously for long‑term maintenance of self‑determined living: housing and economic stability, multilayered social support, iterative self‑determination experiences, stigma reduction, and 24‑hour crisis response. Although these pillars emerged across all three countries, their strength and interaction varied by socio‑institutional context. In Korea, short‑term supportive housing, low‑wage employment, and family protectionism constrained early self‑determination. In the United States, choice‑driven services were well established, yet county‑level fiscal disparities widened regional gaps. In the United Kingdom, Direct Payment institutionalized autonomy, but repeated welfare cuts threatened service continuity. These findings highlight the need for a densely woven, context‑sensitive multi‑pillar ecosystem in national deinstitutionalization policies. For Korea in particular, priorities include expanding long‑term supportive housing, scaling decision‑making training through Independent‑Living Centers, and legislating a digital–mobile hybrid crisis‑safety network.
    번역하기

    This study conducted a meta‑ethnographic synthesis of 21 qualitative investigations published between January 2000 and December 2024 in Korea, the United States, and the United Kingdom that explored self‑determined living among people with men...

    This study conducted a meta‑ethnographic synthesis of 21 qualitative investigations published between January 2000 and December 2024 in Korea, the United States, and the United Kingdom that explored self‑determined living among people with mental illness. Applying Noblit and Hare’s seven‑step meta‑ethnography, we reciprocally translated participant narratives and re‑assembled themes, concepts, and metaphors. The synthesis identified five interlocking pillars that must operate simultaneously for long‑term maintenance of self‑determined living: housing and economic stability, multilayered social support, iterative self‑determination experiences, stigma reduction, and 24‑hour crisis response. Although these pillars emerged across all three countries, their strength and interaction varied by socio‑institutional context. In Korea, short‑term supportive housing, low‑wage employment, and family protectionism constrained early self‑determination. In the United States, choice‑driven services were well established, yet county‑level fiscal disparities widened regional gaps. In the United Kingdom, Direct Payment institutionalized autonomy, but repeated welfare cuts threatened service continuity. These findings highlight the need for a densely woven, context‑sensitive multi‑pillar ecosystem in national deinstitutionalization policies. For Korea in particular, priorities include expanding long‑term supportive housing, scaling decision‑making training through Independent‑Living Centers, and legislating a digital–mobile hybrid crisis‑safety network.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼