RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    생물다양성의 보전과 생태계복원의 법적 과제 = Legal Issues on Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Restoration

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76379523

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The legislative purposes of several environment-related acts including 「Natural Environment Conservation Act」include the conservation of biodiversity. These acts have adopted command-and-control systems, divided as the species-oriented approach and the habitats-oriented approach. These acts, however, have paid little attention to ecosystem restoration in the aspects of biodiversity conservation. This article presents some legal challenges to ecosystem restoration as a new approach to biodiversity conservation. First, it is necessary to define the legal meaning of ecosystem restoration. If it is difficult, its scope should be made clear by specifying its aims, consideration factors, criteria and methods. Second, the principles of ecosystem restoration should be established. In restoring ecosystem, the specific characters and biodiversity of the ecosystem should be considered seriously. In certain circumstances, adaptive management should be employed. Third, who should conduct ecosystem restoration activities, and who should pay the cost of restoring the ecosystem? As a rule, polluter-pays principle should be applied. If there are no polluters or it is impossible to identify the polluters, beneficiary-pays principle or shared responsibility principle may be adopted. And it is required that many interested parties including the State, local governments and community people participate in ecosystem restoration activities. Fourth, what ecosystem should be restored? The objects and priorities of ecosystem restoration should be chosen. To this end, it is necessary to periodically check and monitor ecosystems. Finally, the guidelines on ecosystem restoration should be made, and it is necessary to manage the restored ecosystems continuously.
    번역하기

    The legislative purposes of several environment-related acts including 「Natural Environment Conservation Act」include the conservation of biodiversity. These acts have adopted command-and-control systems, divided as the species-oriented approach an...

    The legislative purposes of several environment-related acts including 「Natural Environment Conservation Act」include the conservation of biodiversity. These acts have adopted command-and-control systems, divided as the species-oriented approach and the habitats-oriented approach. These acts, however, have paid little attention to ecosystem restoration in the aspects of biodiversity conservation. This article presents some legal challenges to ecosystem restoration as a new approach to biodiversity conservation. First, it is necessary to define the legal meaning of ecosystem restoration. If it is difficult, its scope should be made clear by specifying its aims, consideration factors, criteria and methods. Second, the principles of ecosystem restoration should be established. In restoring ecosystem, the specific characters and biodiversity of the ecosystem should be considered seriously. In certain circumstances, adaptive management should be employed. Third, who should conduct ecosystem restoration activities, and who should pay the cost of restoring the ecosystem? As a rule, polluter-pays principle should be applied. If there are no polluters or it is impossible to identify the polluters, beneficiary-pays principle or shared responsibility principle may be adopted. And it is required that many interested parties including the State, local governments and community people participate in ecosystem restoration activities. Fourth, what ecosystem should be restored? The objects and priorities of ecosystem restoration should be chosen. To this end, it is necessary to periodically check and monitor ecosystems. Finally, the guidelines on ecosystem restoration should be made, and it is necessary to manage the restored ecosystems continuously.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김홍균, "환경법: 문제ㆍ사례" 홍문사 2007

    2 조현권, "환경법" 법률문화원 2006

    3 박균성, "환경법" 박영사 2006

    4 김명수, "파편화된 서식처 복원을 위한 기초이론 고찰" 4 (4): 2001

    5 리차드 리키, "제6의 멸종(The Sixth Extinction)" 세종서적 1996

    6 노백호, "자연환경복원 종합대책수립을 위한 연구"

    7 함태성, "유류오염피해로 인한 해양생태계 복원의 법적 과제"

    8 노태호, "수생태계 복원사업의 문제점 및 개선방안"

    9 홍선기, "생태복원공학: 서식지와 생태공간의 보전과 관리"

    10 이은엽, "생태계복원 분야의 전망 및 발전방향"

    1 김홍균, "환경법: 문제ㆍ사례" 홍문사 2007

    2 조현권, "환경법" 법률문화원 2006

    3 박균성, "환경법" 박영사 2006

    4 김명수, "파편화된 서식처 복원을 위한 기초이론 고찰" 4 (4): 2001

    5 리차드 리키, "제6의 멸종(The Sixth Extinction)" 세종서적 1996

    6 노백호, "자연환경복원 종합대책수립을 위한 연구"

    7 함태성, "유류오염피해로 인한 해양생태계 복원의 법적 과제"

    8 노태호, "수생태계 복원사업의 문제점 및 개선방안"

    9 홍선기, "생태복원공학: 서식지와 생태공간의 보전과 관리"

    10 이은엽, "생태계복원 분야의 전망 및 발전방향"

    11 "생물다양성국가전략"

    12 박용하, "생물다양성 보전과 지속가능한 이용"

    13 채영근, "미국 연방정부의 생태계 복원 법제 연구"

    14 이관규, "국토생태계 복원의 개념적 방향과 제언"

    15 양재의, "광산 훼손지역의 생태공학적 산림복구 방안" 1 (1): 2007

    16 羽山伸一, "自然再生推進法案の形成過程と法案の問題点" 32 (32): 2003

    17 "自然再生を推進する市民??連絡? (編), 森、里、川、海をつなぐ自然再生, 中央法規"

    18 "自然再生: 釧路から始まる"

    19 市野隆雄, "生物多樣性の保全にむけて"

    20 坂口洋一, "生物多樣性の保全と復元" 上智大?出版 2005

    21 福島更紀, "河川護岸改修事業におけるレストレ-ションとミティゲ-ション"

    22 Charles M. Peters, "Valuation of an Amazonian Rainforest"

    23 Jason Stone, "The Law of Ecosystem Restoration: National Policy Implications of the Clark Fork River Basin Natural Resource Damage Program"

    24 Alfred R. Light, "Tales of the Tamiami Trail: Implementing Adaptive management in Everglades Restoration"

    25 Dianne K. Conway, "Salmon on the Brink: The Imperative of Integrating Environmental Standards and Review on an Ecosystem Scale"

    26 Karen D. Holl, "Monitoring and Appraisal, in Martin R. Perrow & Anthony J. Davy (eds.), Handbook of Ecological Restoration: Volume 1 Principles of Restoration" Cambridge University Press 2002

    27 David Hunter, "International Environmental Law and Policy" Foundation Press 2002

    28 Ved P. Nanda, "International Environmental Law & Policy for the 21st Century"

    29 Andre F. Clewell, "Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession" Island Press 2007

    30 Daniel F. Luecke, "An Environmental Perspective on Large Ecosystem Restoration Processes and the Role of the Market"

    31 Julie Thrower, "Adaptive Management and NEPA: How a Nonequilibrium View of Ecosystem Mandates Flexible Regulation"

    32 Sean Phelan, "A Pacific Rim Approach to Salmon Management: Redefining the Role of Pacific Salmon International Consensus"

    33 "2007년말 산림기본통계 조사결과"

    34 "2006년도 부담금운용종합보고서"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.14 1.14 1.15
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.04 0.97 1.226 0.39
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼