RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    서비스무역의 세이프가드 제도의 타당성 검토 = Review on Validity of Safeguard Mechanism for Services

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82675326

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Trade in Services was included in multilateral trading system, WTO, as a result of Uruguay Round. Services are the highly sensitive fields in that it is intimate to state`s economy, financial and exchange and so on. Therefore several issues regarding to services was remained unsolved at the time that Uruguay Round negotiations was finished. WTO Agreements recognize those issues are very important and should be solved as soon as possible. Safeguard is one of those issues to be continued to be negotiated since WTO Agreements put in force. Service Safeguard has been under negotiations as a agenda of Doha Development Agenda, the 9th round of multilateral trade negotiations. Most developing countries are n for including the service safeguard system within General Agreement on Trade in Services(GATS). And they has actively proposed various directions that services safeguard should be at and dealt with possible legal issues. On the other hand most developed countries are not sure that the desireability and feasibility of safeguard regime for services. Nonetheless they also have submitted several proposals concerning the safeguard regime for services. The essence of the safeguard regime is to protect domestic against urgent surge of imports as a result of trade concessions. The desireability and feasibility of the safeguard regime for services should be considered based on this point. The result of negotiations in Doha round would affect laws, regulations, and administrative procedures in members of WTO. Also GATS provides the absence or elimination of substantially all discrimination within the parties of Economic Integration Agreement, namely Regional Trade Agreement(RTA). And safeguard based on discrimination, as GATS Ⅹ:1 provides, is possible to be considered as a discriminatory measure among constituents of RTA. So we should follow up the process of negotiations in Doha round and keep to study possible legal problems about service safeguard.
    번역하기

    Trade in Services was included in multilateral trading system, WTO, as a result of Uruguay Round. Services are the highly sensitive fields in that it is intimate to state`s economy, financial and exchange and so on. Therefore several issues regarding ...

    Trade in Services was included in multilateral trading system, WTO, as a result of Uruguay Round. Services are the highly sensitive fields in that it is intimate to state`s economy, financial and exchange and so on. Therefore several issues regarding to services was remained unsolved at the time that Uruguay Round negotiations was finished. WTO Agreements recognize those issues are very important and should be solved as soon as possible. Safeguard is one of those issues to be continued to be negotiated since WTO Agreements put in force. Service Safeguard has been under negotiations as a agenda of Doha Development Agenda, the 9th round of multilateral trade negotiations. Most developing countries are n for including the service safeguard system within General Agreement on Trade in Services(GATS). And they has actively proposed various directions that services safeguard should be at and dealt with possible legal issues. On the other hand most developed countries are not sure that the desireability and feasibility of safeguard regime for services. Nonetheless they also have submitted several proposals concerning the safeguard regime for services. The essence of the safeguard regime is to protect domestic against urgent surge of imports as a result of trade concessions. The desireability and feasibility of the safeguard regime for services should be considered based on this point. The result of negotiations in Doha round would affect laws, regulations, and administrative procedures in members of WTO. Also GATS provides the absence or elimination of substantially all discrimination within the parties of Economic Integration Agreement, namely Regional Trade Agreement(RTA). And safeguard based on discrimination, as GATS Ⅹ:1 provides, is possible to be considered as a discriminatory measure among constituents of RTA. So we should follow up the process of negotiations in Doha round and keep to study possible legal problems about service safeguard.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 외교통상부, "한-미 FTA 설명자료" 외교통상부

    2 John Howard Jackson, "World Trading system" MIT Press 1997

    3 Alan O. Sykes, "The WTO Agreement on Safeguards: A Commentary" 2006

    4 WTO Council for Trade in Services, "Special Session, Report of the Meeting Held on 9 October 2009, Note by the Secretariat, TN/S/M/32 (6 November, 2009)"

    5 WTO Council for Trade in Services, "Special Session, Report of the Meeting Held on 4 and 10 JULY and 3 september 2003, Note by the Secretariat, TN/S/M/8 (29 September, 2003)"

    6 WTO Council for Trade in Services, "Special Session, Report of the Meeting Held on 31 october, 3 and 24 november 2005, Note by the Secretariat, TN/S/M/17 (30 January, 2006)" 2006

    7 Young-Shik Lee, "Safeguard Measures in World Trade, 2nd edition" Kluwer Law International BV 2007

    8 "Note from the Chairperson, Job No. 3102 (3 June, 1997)"

    9 WTO Working Party on GATS Rules, "Negotiations on Emergencyn Safeguard Measures, Report by the Chairperson of the Working Party on GATS Rules, S/WPGR/9(14 March, 2003)"

    10 Andreas F. Lowenfeld, "International Economic Law, 2nd edition" 2008

    1 외교통상부, "한-미 FTA 설명자료" 외교통상부

    2 John Howard Jackson, "World Trading system" MIT Press 1997

    3 Alan O. Sykes, "The WTO Agreement on Safeguards: A Commentary" 2006

    4 WTO Council for Trade in Services, "Special Session, Report of the Meeting Held on 9 October 2009, Note by the Secretariat, TN/S/M/32 (6 November, 2009)"

    5 WTO Council for Trade in Services, "Special Session, Report of the Meeting Held on 4 and 10 JULY and 3 september 2003, Note by the Secretariat, TN/S/M/8 (29 September, 2003)"

    6 WTO Council for Trade in Services, "Special Session, Report of the Meeting Held on 31 october, 3 and 24 november 2005, Note by the Secretariat, TN/S/M/17 (30 January, 2006)" 2006

    7 Young-Shik Lee, "Safeguard Measures in World Trade, 2nd edition" Kluwer Law International BV 2007

    8 "Note from the Chairperson, Job No. 3102 (3 June, 1997)"

    9 WTO Working Party on GATS Rules, "Negotiations on Emergencyn Safeguard Measures, Report by the Chairperson of the Working Party on GATS Rules, S/WPGR/9(14 March, 2003)"

    10 Andreas F. Lowenfeld, "International Economic Law, 2nd edition" 2008

    11 WTO Working Party on GATS Rules, "Communication from the United States, Emergency Sagfeguards, S/WPGR/W/17 (13 March 1997)"

    12 WTO Working Party on GATS Rules, "Communication from the United States, Desirability of a Safeguard Mechanism for Services: Promoting Liberalization of Trade in Services, S/WPGR/W/37 (2 October, 2001)"

    13 WTO Working Party on GATS Rules, "Communication from the European Communities and Their Member States, Scope for Emergency Safeguard Measures (ESM) in the GATS, S/WPGR/W/41 (3 March, 2003)"

    14 WTO Working Party on GATS Rules, "Communication from Poland, Emergency Safeguards Mechanism contained in Article 18 Act of 18December1998 on Foreign Exchange Law, S/WPGR/W/34(3 July 2000)"

    15 WTO Working Party on GATS Rules, "Communication from Poland, Emergency Safeguards Mechanism contained in Article 18 Act of 18December1998 on Foreign Exchange Law, S/WPGR/W/34(3 July 2000)"

    16 WTO Working Party on GATS Rules, "Communication from ASEAN, Concept Paper: Elements of a Possible Agreed Draft of Rules on Emergency Safeguard Measures for Trade in Services (GATS Article X), S/WPGR/W/30 (14 March, 2000)"

    17 Ministerial Declaration, "Adopted on 14 November 2001, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1 (20 November, 2001)"

    18 WTO Working Party Rules, "Activities of the Working Party Rules, Report to the Council for Trade in Services, S/WPGR/1 (23 October, 1996)"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.53 0.53 0.6
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.57 0.57 0.735 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼