RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCOPUS KCI등재

      직장감각저하 환자에서 바이오피드백 치료에 대한장기간 효과 및 인자 분석 = Response to Biofeedback Therapy for Patients with Rectal Hyposensitivity

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101520694

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: Rectal hyposensitivity (RH) has been treated with conventional biofeedback therapy (BFT), whereas the effectiveness and long term results of this therapy are not known. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of BFT for patients wit...

      Background/Aims: Rectal hyposensitivity (RH) has been treated with conventional biofeedback therapy (BFT), whereas the effectiveness and long term results of this therapy are not known. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of BFT for patients with RH by conducting a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Methods: From June 2004 to March 2007, we enrolled those RH patients who underwent BFT. BFT was performed two or three times every week. Six months after BFT, the clinical response was evaluated by subjective and objective parameters. Results: A total of 82 RH patients underwent BFT. Fifty three patients finished BFT and the other 29 patients dropped out during BFT. Thirty six patients (67.9%) showed responsiveness (R) to BFT and 17 (31.5%) showed non-responsiveness (NR). The characteristics between the two groups showed no difference, except for the “desire to defecate” volume (116.1±25.2 in the R group vs. 140.0±43.9 in the NR group, p value <0.05) and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) (15.6±0.5 in the R group R vs. 27.6±18.2 in the NR group, p value <0.05). The R group showed a shorter colon transit time compared to NR group. At six months after BFT, a total of 20 patients were interviewed; 15 patients answered that they still had responsiveness (75%). Conclusions: The patients with RH showed a similar BFT response to that of the constipated patients. However, the patients with a more hyposensitive rectum and a longer colonic transit showed NR to BFT, suggesting RH is an important factor in BFT responsiveness. (Intest Res 2008;6:56-69)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Chiarioni G., "dysfunction, not patients with isolated slow transit constipation" 129 : 86-97, 2005

      2 Williams N.S., "Vertical reduction rectoplasty: a new treatment for idiopathic megarectum" 87 : 1203-1208, 2000

      3 Whitehead W.E., "Tolerance for 69 :Response to Biofeedback Therapy for Patients with Rectal Hyposensitivity rectosigmoid distention in irritable bowel syndrome" 98 : 1187-1192, 1990

      4 Camilleri M., "Testing the sensitivity hypothesis in practice: tools and methods, assumptions and pitfalls" i34-i40, 2002

      5 Shorvon P.J., "Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications" 30 : 1737-1749, 1989

      6 Metcalf A.M., "Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit" 92 : 40-47, 1987

      7 Arhan P., "Segmental colonic transit time" 24 : 625-629, 1981

      8 Gladman M.A., "Rectal hyposensitivity: prevalence and clinical impact in patients with intractable constipation and fecal incontinence" 46 : 238-246, 2003

      9 Vasudevan S.P., "Rectal hyposensitivity: evaluation of anal sensation in female patients with refractory constipation with and without faecal incontinence" 19 : 660-667, 2007

      10 Kim C.S., "Rectal hyposensitivity in painless normal transit/normal defecatory constipation" 34 : 472-478, 1999

      1 Chiarioni G., "dysfunction, not patients with isolated slow transit constipation" 129 : 86-97, 2005

      2 Williams N.S., "Vertical reduction rectoplasty: a new treatment for idiopathic megarectum" 87 : 1203-1208, 2000

      3 Whitehead W.E., "Tolerance for 69 :Response to Biofeedback Therapy for Patients with Rectal Hyposensitivity rectosigmoid distention in irritable bowel syndrome" 98 : 1187-1192, 1990

      4 Camilleri M., "Testing the sensitivity hypothesis in practice: tools and methods, assumptions and pitfalls" i34-i40, 2002

      5 Shorvon P.J., "Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications" 30 : 1737-1749, 1989

      6 Metcalf A.M., "Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit" 92 : 40-47, 1987

      7 Arhan P., "Segmental colonic transit time" 24 : 625-629, 1981

      8 Gladman M.A., "Rectal hyposensitivity: prevalence and clinical impact in patients with intractable constipation and fecal incontinence" 46 : 238-246, 2003

      9 Vasudevan S.P., "Rectal hyposensitivity: evaluation of anal sensation in female patients with refractory constipation with and without faecal incontinence" 19 : 660-667, 2007

      10 Kim C.S., "Rectal hyposensitivity in painless normal transit/normal defecatory constipation" 34 : 472-478, 1999

      11 Gladman M.A., "Rectal hyposensitivity" 101 : 1140-1151, 2006

      12 Yang H.R., "Pattern analysis of defecography in patients with chronic functional constipation: is it predictable for the responsiveness of biofeedback therapy?" 53 : 95-102, 2005

      13 Peticca L., "Outlet obstruction due to anismus and rectal hyposensation: effect of biofeedback training" 4 : 67-, 2002

      14 Baek S.M., "Outcome and prognostic factors associated with poor outcome of biofeedback therapy for constipated patients with non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome" 19 : 74-81, 2003

      15 Rao S.S., "Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination" 93 : 1042-1050, 1998

      16 Rao S.S., "Loening-Baucke V. Biofeedback therapy for defecation disorders" 78S-92S, 1997

      17 Chang H.S., "Functional constipation with impaired rectal sensation improved by electrical stimulation therapy: report of a case" 47 : 933-936, 2004

      18 Bharucha A.E., "Functional anorectal disorders" 130 : 1510-1518, 2006

      19 Baldi F., "Function of the internal anal sphincter and rectal sensitivity in idiopathic constipation" 24 : 14-22, 1982

      20 Rao S.S., "Effects of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function in obstructive defecation" 42 : 2197-2205, 1997

      21 Chang H.S., "Effect of electrical stimulation in constipated patients with impaired rectal sensation" 18 : 433-438, 2003

      22 Park D.H., "Clinical factors associated with response to biofeedback therapy for patients with chronic constipation" 42 : 289-296, 2003

      23 Prior A., "Changes in rectal sensitivity after hypnotherapy in patients with irritable bowel syndrome" 31 : 896-898, 1990

      24 Rhee P.L., "An increased rectal maximum tolerable volume and long anal canal are associated with poor short-term response to biofeedback therapy for patients with anismus with decreased bowel frequency and normal colonic transit time" 43 : 1405-1411, 2000

      25 Mertz H., "Altered rectal perception is a biological marker of patients with irritable bowel syndrome" 109 : 40-52, 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2015-03-30 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> KASID KCI등재
      2015-03-30 학회명변경 영문명 : KASID -> Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.46
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.35 0.652 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼