RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      진보의 맥락에서 본 아동중심교육 = Progressivism and the Idea of Child-Centeredness

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82432430

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper has tried to examine how progressivism and child-centered education has formed and connected each other. Enlightenment was crucial under the historical series of social progress such as Renaissance, Reformation and the Romanticism, from which the `Enlightenment Project` had been established, despite the disparity with that hold by MacIntyre. Two heritages form Enlightenment Project were socialism and romanticism. The former has by itself reformed `Grand Social Engineering Project` under which Condorcet in France and Owen in England tried to build the utopian and socialist society from the public education collectively maintained. The latter had generated two negative aspects such as iconoclasm and anti-intellectualism, particularly taken by Rousseau, which also had formed the idea of child-centered education. The so-called progressive ideas since Renaissance onward, as argued and demonstrated in the paper, cannot be seen as making real progress in the light of the conceptual and practical aspects as well as the historical examinations. In other words, the real and social progress cannot be realized under the idea of progressivism seen as the left wing. Unlike the general idea that child-centered education respects the child, the concept of the child-centeredness is not coincided with that of respect for the child.
      번역하기

      This paper has tried to examine how progressivism and child-centered education has formed and connected each other. Enlightenment was crucial under the historical series of social progress such as Renaissance, Reformation and the Romanticism, from whi...

      This paper has tried to examine how progressivism and child-centered education has formed and connected each other. Enlightenment was crucial under the historical series of social progress such as Renaissance, Reformation and the Romanticism, from which the `Enlightenment Project` had been established, despite the disparity with that hold by MacIntyre. Two heritages form Enlightenment Project were socialism and romanticism. The former has by itself reformed `Grand Social Engineering Project` under which Condorcet in France and Owen in England tried to build the utopian and socialist society from the public education collectively maintained. The latter had generated two negative aspects such as iconoclasm and anti-intellectualism, particularly taken by Rousseau, which also had formed the idea of child-centered education. The so-called progressive ideas since Renaissance onward, as argued and demonstrated in the paper, cannot be seen as making real progress in the light of the conceptual and practical aspects as well as the historical examinations. In other words, the real and social progress cannot be realized under the idea of progressivism seen as the left wing. Unlike the general idea that child-centered education respects the child, the concept of the child-centeredness is not coincided with that of respect for the child.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김정래, "하이에크의 ‘경쟁’과 교육" 자유기업원 (1) : 117-143, 2009

      2 Ridley, M., "이타적 유전자" 사이언스북스 1996

      3 Dawkins, R., "이기적 유전자" 을유문화사 2002

      4 Peters, R. S., "윤리학과 교육" 교육과학사 1980

      5 Boyd, W., "서양교육사" 교육과학사 2008

      6 김정래, "가르치는 일의 이기적 특성" 한국교육과정평가원 11 (11): 79-96, 2008

      7 Kant, I., "Über Pädagogik" The University of Michigan Press 1960

      8 Kant, I., "What is Enlightenment" Kramnick 1-7, 1784

      9 Evetts, J., "The Sociology of Educational Ideas" Routledge and Kegan Paul 1973

      10 Ferguson, A., "The Progressive Character of Human Nature" Kramnick 380-382, 1792

      1 김정래, "하이에크의 ‘경쟁’과 교육" 자유기업원 (1) : 117-143, 2009

      2 Ridley, M., "이타적 유전자" 사이언스북스 1996

      3 Dawkins, R., "이기적 유전자" 을유문화사 2002

      4 Peters, R. S., "윤리학과 교육" 교육과학사 1980

      5 Boyd, W., "서양교육사" 교육과학사 2008

      6 김정래, "가르치는 일의 이기적 특성" 한국교육과정평가원 11 (11): 79-96, 2008

      7 Kant, I., "Über Pädagogik" The University of Michigan Press 1960

      8 Kant, I., "What is Enlightenment" Kramnick 1-7, 1784

      9 Evetts, J., "The Sociology of Educational Ideas" Routledge and Kegan Paul 1973

      10 Ferguson, A., "The Progressive Character of Human Nature" Kramnick 380-382, 1792

      11 Condorcet, M., "The Future Progress of the Human Mind, & The Perfectibility of Man" 26-38; 387-395. 26-38, 1995

      12 Hayek, F. A., "The Fatal Conceit" Routledge and Kegan Paul 1988

      13 Hayek, F. A., "The Essence of Hayek" Hoover Institute 1984

      14 Dearden, R. F., "Problems in Primary Education" Routledge and Kegan Paul 1976

      15 Turgot, A-R-J., "On Progress" Kramnick 361-363, 1995

      16 Dearden, R. F., "Instruction and Learning by Discovery. in: The Concept of Education" Routledge and Kegan Paul 135-155, 1967

      17 Gutek, G. L., "Historical and Philosophical Foundations of Education" Merrill Prentice Hall 1991

      18 Kant, I., "Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals" Harper & Row 1964

      19 Friedman, M., "Free to Choose" Harcourt 1979

      20 Kramnick, I., "Enlightenment Reader" Penguin 1995

      21 Roousseau, J-J., "Emile, Bloom, A.(trans.)" Basic Books 1979

      22 Roousseau, J-J., "Discourse on Inequality" Oxford University Press 1994

      23 Peters, R. S., "Authority, Responsibility and Education" George Allen and Unwin 1959

      24 MacIntyre, A., "After Virtue" Duckworth 1981

      25 Rawls, J., "A Theory of Justice" Harvard University Press 1971

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼