RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      요추부 수술시 자세에 따른 요추 시상각의 변화 = Change of Lumbar Lordosis According to the Different Operative Positions

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19723506

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Study Design : This study is a prospective evaluation of the effect of several operative positions on lumbar sagittal alignment by radiographic analysis of 20 healthy volunteers.
      Objective : The purpose of the study was to compare operative tables commonly used for spinal procedures and to determine which positions reproduce normal lumbar lordosis.
      Material and Methods : Healthy twenty volunteers aged 20-35 years were enrolled in the study. No subject had a history of low back pain and lumbar surgery. Each volunteer underwent a lateral radiographs with tube to film distance 1 m and beam centered on L3 vertebra. Five radiographs were taken for each volunteer, in standing, prone position on 05I table with 0 hip flexion, 90 hip flexion, 60 hip flexion and prone position on four poster frame with 0 hip flexion. Intervertebral segmental angel from L1 to S1, lordotic angle from L1 to L5 and L1 to S1 were measured using a goniometer with 1 precision. To check intra and inter-observer error of radiography measurements, repeated measurements of radiography by one personnel and three different personnel were done and coefficient of variation was below 5%. Data was analyzed with SPSS and ANOVA was used for a statistical comparison.
      Results : All segmental and lumbar lordotic angles showed no statistically significant difference between standing and prone position on four poster frame. All segmental angles, except L1-2 and L2-3 segments, showed no difference between standing and prone position on OSI table with 0 hip flexion. Segmental and lumbar lordotic angles of prone position with 90 hip flexion and 60 hip flexion revealed statistically significant difference from standing position.
      Conclusion : Physiologic lordosis values were produced only by the prone position on the four poster frame and prone position on OSI table with 0?hip flexion. Prone positions with 60?and 90?hip flexion resulted in statistically significant decrease in lumbar lordosis.
      번역하기

      Study Design : This study is a prospective evaluation of the effect of several operative positions on lumbar sagittal alignment by radiographic analysis of 20 healthy volunteers. Objective : The purpose of the study was to compare operative tables co...

      Study Design : This study is a prospective evaluation of the effect of several operative positions on lumbar sagittal alignment by radiographic analysis of 20 healthy volunteers.
      Objective : The purpose of the study was to compare operative tables commonly used for spinal procedures and to determine which positions reproduce normal lumbar lordosis.
      Material and Methods : Healthy twenty volunteers aged 20-35 years were enrolled in the study. No subject had a history of low back pain and lumbar surgery. Each volunteer underwent a lateral radiographs with tube to film distance 1 m and beam centered on L3 vertebra. Five radiographs were taken for each volunteer, in standing, prone position on 05I table with 0 hip flexion, 90 hip flexion, 60 hip flexion and prone position on four poster frame with 0 hip flexion. Intervertebral segmental angel from L1 to S1, lordotic angle from L1 to L5 and L1 to S1 were measured using a goniometer with 1 precision. To check intra and inter-observer error of radiography measurements, repeated measurements of radiography by one personnel and three different personnel were done and coefficient of variation was below 5%. Data was analyzed with SPSS and ANOVA was used for a statistical comparison.
      Results : All segmental and lumbar lordotic angles showed no statistically significant difference between standing and prone position on four poster frame. All segmental angles, except L1-2 and L2-3 segments, showed no difference between standing and prone position on OSI table with 0 hip flexion. Segmental and lumbar lordotic angles of prone position with 90 hip flexion and 60 hip flexion revealed statistically significant difference from standing position.
      Conclusion : Physiologic lordosis values were produced only by the prone position on the four poster frame and prone position on OSI table with 0?hip flexion. Prone positions with 60?and 90?hip flexion resulted in statistically significant decrease in lumbar lordosis.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼