RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      근시가 험프리 매트릭스 30-2 검사에 미치는 영향 = The Effect of Myopic Optical Defocus on the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 Test

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100523209

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      `Purpose: To investigate the effect of myopic optical defocus on Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test. Methods: Twenty-nine myopic eyes of 29 patients underwent 2 consecutive tests with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 threshold program. The first and second tests were performed with and without correction for myopia. Differences between the mean deviation (?MD) and the pattern standard deviation (?PSD) were calculated, and a correlation between the spherical equivalent (SE) and ?MD and ?PSD was investigated. The influence of optical defocus according to the visual field (central and peripheral) and the severity of glaucomatous visual field damage (area with total deviation plot of ‘P<0.1%’ or ‘P<0.5%’ and the other area) were also evaluated. Results: The correlation between SE and ?MD was significant (p=0.02, r=0.62). However, the correlation between SE and ?PSD was not significant (p=0.81, r=0.15). The differences in the mean total deviation printout value of the central and peripheral visual field groups between the two tests were 5.85±4.26dB and 5.66±3.56dB, respectively (P=0.86). The differences in the mean total deviation printout value of severely damaged and less damaged areas between the two tests were 3.16±3.39dB and 6.62±4.62dB, respectively (P<0.01). Conclusions: Myopic optical defocus has a significant effect on the results of the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test. There is no difference in the effect of myopia between the central and peripheral visual fields, and the effect is decreased in severely damaged visual fields.`
      번역하기

      `Purpose: To investigate the effect of myopic optical defocus on Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test. Methods: Twenty-nine myopic eyes of 29 patients underwent 2 consecutive tests with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 threshold program. The first and second tests were ...

      `Purpose: To investigate the effect of myopic optical defocus on Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test. Methods: Twenty-nine myopic eyes of 29 patients underwent 2 consecutive tests with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 threshold program. The first and second tests were performed with and without correction for myopia. Differences between the mean deviation (?MD) and the pattern standard deviation (?PSD) were calculated, and a correlation between the spherical equivalent (SE) and ?MD and ?PSD was investigated. The influence of optical defocus according to the visual field (central and peripheral) and the severity of glaucomatous visual field damage (area with total deviation plot of ‘P<0.1%’ or ‘P<0.5%’ and the other area) were also evaluated. Results: The correlation between SE and ?MD was significant (p=0.02, r=0.62). However, the correlation between SE and ?PSD was not significant (p=0.81, r=0.15). The differences in the mean total deviation printout value of the central and peripheral visual field groups between the two tests were 5.85±4.26dB and 5.66±3.56dB, respectively (P=0.86). The differences in the mean total deviation printout value of severely damaged and less damaged areas between the two tests were 3.16±3.39dB and 6.62±4.62dB, respectively (P<0.01). Conclusions: Myopic optical defocus has a significant effect on the results of the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test. There is no difference in the effect of myopia between the central and peripheral visual fields, and the effect is decreased in severely damaged visual fields.`

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Legge GE, "Tolerance to visual defocus" 4 : 851-863, 1987

      2 Brush MB, "Test-retest variability in glaucoma patients tested with C-20-1 screening-mode frequency doubling technology perimetry" 13 : 273-277, 2004

      3 Heeg GP, "Strategies for improving the diagnostic specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter" 83 : 53-56, 2005

      4 Johnson CA, "Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry" 38 : 413-425, 1997

      5 Quigley HA, "Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma" 107 : 453-464, 1989

      6 Wall M, "Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects" 120 : 587-596, 1995

      7 Johnson CA, "Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry" 111 : 651-656, 1993

      8 Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, "Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons" 41 : 741-748, 2000

      9 Adams CW, "Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry" 76 : 582-587, 1999

      10 Bosworth CF, "Motion automated perimetry identifies early glaucomatous field defects" 116 : 1153-1158, 1998

      1 Legge GE, "Tolerance to visual defocus" 4 : 851-863, 1987

      2 Brush MB, "Test-retest variability in glaucoma patients tested with C-20-1 screening-mode frequency doubling technology perimetry" 13 : 273-277, 2004

      3 Heeg GP, "Strategies for improving the diagnostic specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter" 83 : 53-56, 2005

      4 Johnson CA, "Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry" 38 : 413-425, 1997

      5 Quigley HA, "Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma" 107 : 453-464, 1989

      6 Wall M, "Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects" 120 : 587-596, 1995

      7 Johnson CA, "Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry" 111 : 651-656, 1993

      8 Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, "Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons" 41 : 741-748, 2000

      9 Adams CW, "Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry" 76 : 582-587, 1999

      10 Bosworth CF, "Motion automated perimetry identifies early glaucomatous field defects" 116 : 1153-1158, 1998

      11 Joson PJ, "Learning effects among perimetric novices in frequency doubling technology perimetry" 109 : 757-760, 2002

      12 Iester M, "Learning effect, short-term fluctuation, and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique" 130 : 160-164, 2000

      13 Heeg GP, "Learning effect, normal range, and test-retest variability of Frequency Doubling Perimetry as a function of age, perimetric experience, and the presence or absence of glaucoma" 23 : 535-540, 2003

      14 Quigley HA, "Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology" 125 : 819-829, 1998

      15 Haymes SA, "Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study" 46 : 547-554, 2005

      16 Anderson AJ, "Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and optical defocus" 44 : 4147-4152, 2003

      17 Brusini P, "Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test" 15 : 77-83, 2006

      18 Brusini P, "Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test" 15 : 77-83, 2006

      19 Kelly DH, "Frequency doubling in visual responses" 56 : 1628-1633, 1966

      20 Glovinsky Y, "Foveal ganglion cell loss in size dependent on experimental glaucoma" 32 : 484-491, 1991

      21 Artes PH, "Effects of blur and repeated testing on sensitivity estimates with frequency doubling perimetry" 44 : 646-652, 2003

      22 Ito A, "Effect of myopia on frequency-doubling perimetry" 42 : 1107-1110, 2001

      23 Ko BS, "Correlation between optic disc tomography and frequency doubling technology in glaucoma suspect" 44 : 2040-2046, 2003

      24 Quigley HA, "Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers" 95 : 357-363, 1988

      25 Anderson AJ, "Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter" 46 : 1540-1548, 2005

      26 Johnson CA, "Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss" 111 : 645-650, 1993

      27 Kogure S, "Agreement between frequency doubling perimetry and static perimetry in eyes with high tension glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma" 87 : 604-608, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.23 0.366 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼