RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      전자궁적출술 후 자가통증조절장치을 이용하여 정맥과 경막외로 투여된 Alfentanil의제통 효과 비교

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10669442

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        대전 : 충남대학교 대학원, 2006

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        2006

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • DDC

        617.96 판사항(20)

      • 발행국(도시)

        대전

      • 기타서명

        Patient-controlled analgesia of Alfentanil after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Comparison of Epidural and Intravenous Route

      • 형태사항

        27 p : 삽화 ; 26 cm.

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수 : 윤석화
        참고문헌 : p. 20-25

      • 소장기관
        • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of epidural vs intravenous of alfentanil for treatment of postoperative pain.
      Forty ASA 1 or 2 patients were randomized to two groups receiving either an intravenous (Group I) or an epidural (Group E) infusion of alfentanil for post- operative pain relief. In both groups, loading dose of alfentanil 750?g was administered, following by a continuous infusion of alfentanil 10mg for 20hr. All patients used the same infusion rate (3ml/hr), bolus dose (1.5ml) and lockout time (15min). The analgesic effect was evaluated by using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 5min, 10min, 30min, 1hr, 2hr, 12hr and 20hr postoperatively. In addition, sedation score, complication, satisfaction degree was checked up to 20 hr after surgery.
      No significant difference was evident between the two groups in term of pain score and satisfaction degree. The onset of analgesia was significantly quicker in the intravenous group versus the epidural group. Side effect such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus and respiratory depression appeared with same incidence in both groups.
      We conclude that the intravenous and the epidural routes were equally effective for providing postoperative pain control. In view of the observation we were not able to demonstrate a spinal action of alfentanil.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of epidural vs intravenous of alfentanil for treatment of postoperative pain. Forty ASA 1 or 2 patients were randomized to two groups receiving either an intravenous (Group I) or an epidur...

      The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of epidural vs intravenous of alfentanil for treatment of postoperative pain.
      Forty ASA 1 or 2 patients were randomized to two groups receiving either an intravenous (Group I) or an epidural (Group E) infusion of alfentanil for post- operative pain relief. In both groups, loading dose of alfentanil 750?g was administered, following by a continuous infusion of alfentanil 10mg for 20hr. All patients used the same infusion rate (3ml/hr), bolus dose (1.5ml) and lockout time (15min). The analgesic effect was evaluated by using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 5min, 10min, 30min, 1hr, 2hr, 12hr and 20hr postoperatively. In addition, sedation score, complication, satisfaction degree was checked up to 20 hr after surgery.
      No significant difference was evident between the two groups in term of pain score and satisfaction degree. The onset of analgesia was significantly quicker in the intravenous group versus the epidural group. Side effect such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus and respiratory depression appeared with same incidence in both groups.
      We conclude that the intravenous and the epidural routes were equally effective for providing postoperative pain control. In view of the observation we were not able to demonstrate a spinal action of alfentanil.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 서론 = 1
      • 대상 및 실험방법 = 4
      • 결과 = 8
      • 고찰 = 12
      • 결론 = 21
      • 서론 = 1
      • 대상 및 실험방법 = 4
      • 결과 = 8
      • 고찰 = 12
      • 결론 = 21
      • 참고문헌 = 22
      • Abstract = 29
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼