RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국의 원자력 외교: 쟁점과 과제 = Korea`s Atomic Energy Diplomacy: Issues and Options

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101892260

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper addresses the key issues and options in South Korea``s atomic energy security. South Korea``s nuclear energy policy has evolved since the 1950s, with much assistance from the US in technology, let alone the provision of nuclear materials and related facilities. In the meantime, South Korea has become sixth in the world in terms of nuclear energy usage, while searching for diplomatic and technological breakthroughs in terms of solving the problem of spent fuel accumulation. Related to this, the US initiative toward GNEP(Global Nuclear Energy Partnership) is both a challenge and opportunity for South Korea``s future atomic energy vision. This initiative opens the door for close cooperation with the United States, particularly in pyroprocessing, which is a very attractive technological option in resolving the high-level nuclear waste. However, the US attempt at constraining the rights of nuclear fuel cycle activities impose serious obstacles to South Korea``s peaceful use of nuclear energy activities. Therefore, it is an imperative for South Korea to earn the trust of the US in terms of South Korea``s nuclear energy activities, including the recycling of spent fuel. South Korea must actively involve itself in multilateral cooperation on the nuclear fuel cycle, while heightening its credential and transparency as a trustworthy nuclear energy country. It is of utmost importance to deepen diplomatic coordination and technological cooperation with the United States, the very provider of original nuclear technology for South Korea. The most significant task at hand is obtaining programmatic prior consent from the US in the atomic energy cooperation agreement, that is soon to be renewed by 2014.
      번역하기

      This paper addresses the key issues and options in South Korea``s atomic energy security. South Korea``s nuclear energy policy has evolved since the 1950s, with much assistance from the US in technology, let alone the provision of nuclear materials an...

      This paper addresses the key issues and options in South Korea``s atomic energy security. South Korea``s nuclear energy policy has evolved since the 1950s, with much assistance from the US in technology, let alone the provision of nuclear materials and related facilities. In the meantime, South Korea has become sixth in the world in terms of nuclear energy usage, while searching for diplomatic and technological breakthroughs in terms of solving the problem of spent fuel accumulation. Related to this, the US initiative toward GNEP(Global Nuclear Energy Partnership) is both a challenge and opportunity for South Korea``s future atomic energy vision. This initiative opens the door for close cooperation with the United States, particularly in pyroprocessing, which is a very attractive technological option in resolving the high-level nuclear waste. However, the US attempt at constraining the rights of nuclear fuel cycle activities impose serious obstacles to South Korea``s peaceful use of nuclear energy activities. Therefore, it is an imperative for South Korea to earn the trust of the US in terms of South Korea``s nuclear energy activities, including the recycling of spent fuel. South Korea must actively involve itself in multilateral cooperation on the nuclear fuel cycle, while heightening its credential and transparency as a trustworthy nuclear energy country. It is of utmost importance to deepen diplomatic coordination and technological cooperation with the United States, the very provider of original nuclear technology for South Korea. The most significant task at hand is obtaining programmatic prior consent from the US in the atomic energy cooperation agreement, that is soon to be renewed by 2014.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "한국원자력 협력 표준협정 모델 개발" 서울: 과학기술처 1997

      2 "일 원자력 협정 및 협상과정에 관한 연구" 1994

      3 "원자력 협력 협정에 관한 연구" 1995

      4 "원자력 투명성 및 신뢰성 확보 일본의 사례" 2006.12.22.

      5 "사용 후 핵연료 현안" 2006

      6 "미일교섭의 정책결정과정" 11 (11): 2002

      7 "미국의 21세기 원자력 정책: 함의와 대안" 13 (13): 2006

      8 "미국 원자력 Think-Tank 기관 현황 분석 및 한국과 연계강화에 관한 방안 연구" 2003

      9 "대미원자력외교 선진화 방안 연구" 외교안보연구원 2006

      10 "국제레짐의 한계와 패권" 15 (15): 2006

      1 "한국원자력 협력 표준협정 모델 개발" 서울: 과학기술처 1997

      2 "일 원자력 협정 및 협상과정에 관한 연구" 1994

      3 "원자력 협력 협정에 관한 연구" 1995

      4 "원자력 투명성 및 신뢰성 확보 일본의 사례" 2006.12.22.

      5 "사용 후 핵연료 현안" 2006

      6 "미일교섭의 정책결정과정" 11 (11): 2002

      7 "미국의 21세기 원자력 정책: 함의와 대안" 13 (13): 2006

      8 "미국 원자력 Think-Tank 기관 현황 분석 및 한국과 연계강화에 관한 방안 연구" 2003

      9 "대미원자력외교 선진화 방안 연구" 외교안보연구원 2006

      10 "국제레짐의 한계와 패권" 15 (15): 2006

      11 "고준위 방사성 폐기물 관리의 현황과 미래" 2006.6.

      12 "“Statement on United States Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy" 1981

      13 "“Pyrochemical Processing of DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel"

      14 "US Approaches toward the Two Remaining Evils" 17 (17):

      15 "The nuclear Fuel Cycle: A Challenge for Nonproliferation" Disarmament Diplomacy (76) : March/April2004.

      16 "The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and Peaceful Nuclear Energy" March2,2006.

      17 "State of the Union address by the President, United States Capitol, Washington, D.C., January 31, 2006" 2006

      18 "State of the Union address by the President, United States Capitol, Washington, D.C., January 23, 2007" 2007

      19 "SFR 기술 개발을 위한 국제협력 방안: GEN Ⅳ 및 GNEP" 2006.12.22.

      20 "Proliferation Control Regimes: Background and Status" CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RL31559 Dec.26,2006.

      21 "Post-Irradiation Examination and R&D Programs Using Irradiated Fuels at KAERI" 1995

      22 "Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology, US Department of Energy, Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative" 2006.11.16

      23 "Nuclear Renaissance: Technologies and Policies for the Future of Nuclear Power" Taylor & Francis Group 2005

      24 "Nuclear Renaissance or Nuclear Nightmare?" CorpWatch October23,2002

      25 "Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer" NY: The New Press 2006

      26 "Nuclear Nonproliferation Issues" June3,2005.

      27 "Going Nuclear: A Green Makes the Case" The Washington Post April16,2006.

      28 "Generation IV Roadmap: Report of the Fuel Cycle Crosscut Group" Washington, D.C. March2001.

      29 "DOE’s Nuclear Energy Research Programs Threaten National Security" Natural Resources Defense Council

      30 "Cooperation for Civil Uses Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Korea Agreement signed at Washington November 24 Entered into force March 19" 19721973

      31 "Congress Votes to Expand Sale of Nuclear Technology to India" The Washington Post December9,2006.

      32 "Bush’s Nuclear Nonproliferation Policies" November7∼8,2005.

      33 "Agreement for Cooperation between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of _________ Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, Rev. August 2002" 2002

      34 "A Renaissance in Nuclear Power Is Under Way around the World" Executive Intelligence Review Feb.24,2006.

      35 "A Brighter Tomorrow" Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 2004

      36 "2007 국제 원자력 주요 이슈와 전망" 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.8 0.8 0.84
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 1.29 1.221 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼