The study reviewed the background of writing about <Kim-shin-sun-jeon金神仙傳> and the consciousness of the writer, Yeonam燕巖 by analyzing the 「Gua-jung-rok過庭錄」(a biography on Yeonam) and works itself. From a close observation, ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104692107
2004
-
학술저널
139-158(20쪽)
4
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The study reviewed the background of writing about <Kim-shin-sun-jeon金神仙傳> and the consciousness of the writer, Yeonam燕巖 by analyzing the 「Gua-jung-rok過庭錄」(a biography on Yeonam) and works itself. From a close observation, ...
The study reviewed the background of writing about <Kim-shin-sun-jeon金神仙傳> and the consciousness of the writer, Yeonam燕巖 by analyzing the 「Gua-jung-rok過庭錄」(a biography on Yeonam) and works itself. From a close observation, it seems that Yeonam was hardly tolerate of the unjust society and dishonest characters of his early years. In the latter part of the eighteenth century, the Chosun dynasty was very unfair and corrupted in take man of talent(into government service). So he was suffered from mental depression. Get out of melancholia, Yeonam wrote a Chinese characters short story漢文短篇 in young ages.
Kim,hong-gi金弘基, the main character of the story was a runaway from the real world rather than a shinsun神仙(Taoist hermit) of Taoism. He is wandered through the common society and noted mountains in depression, realizing that world did not recognize him. In his writing Yeonam satirized and criticized the society he lives that would not allow such intellectuals to be elevated to high positions(government official). He also showed deep interest on friends of Kim,hong-gi. Externally, their lives in the story was filled with alcohol, music and antiquing but internally they were helpless intellectuals living in common society where their wills were not expressed and the frustration remained hardened in their heart. By writing about their lives, Yeonam was able to expose the problem of intellectuals not being able to serve in high positions of the society.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 문영오, "연암소설의 도교 철학적 조명" 1993
2 이가원, "연암소설연구" 을유문화사 1965
3 이종주, "북학파산문연구" 1990
4 이종주, "북학파산문연구" 1990
5 김영동, "박지원소설연구" 1993
6 김명호, "박지원문학연구" 성균관대 대동문화연구원 2001
7 박기석, "박지원문학연구" 1984
1 문영오, "연암소설의 도교 철학적 조명" 1993
2 이가원, "연암소설연구" 을유문화사 1965
3 이종주, "북학파산문연구" 1990
4 이종주, "북학파산문연구" 1990
5 김영동, "박지원소설연구" 1993
6 김명호, "박지원문학연구" 성균관대 대동문화연구원 2001
7 박기석, "박지원문학연구" 1984
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2004-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.2 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.05 | 0.94 | 2.362 | 0.21 |