RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      특허권의 공동소유에 관한 법률관계 = A Study on Joint Ownership of the Patent Rights

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76453661

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      It is said that no less than companies attempt to do joint research and study with universities or research centers. Therefore, it is common to have joint ownership with joint parties. On the other hand, lots of companies have struggled with bankruptcy since economy slump in 1998, so it is inevitable to claim on the basis of the joint ownership of patent rights.
      On the legal construction of joint ownership, a common view gives an explanation that joint ownership is a situation for ownership to be belong to the number of people being dived quantitively. Partition claim right is one-sided claim right that does away with existing part-owners relation over all or partially and generates legal relation dividing common property to each joint owners.
      In relation to judicial precedents basing on the theory of ownerships competition and on the theory of quantitive dividing, joint ownership disputes have increased. As it is, it became necessary to protect patent rights. According to the case law in this disputes, it is clear to have judgment on the ground of joint ownership rules.
      The intellectual property law has becomes a precondition affecting national competitiveness in 21st century. However, it is totally different even if each country has holed a patent law. That"s why it is confronted by forum shopping among international lawyers of the intellectual property.
      Judicial jurisdiction has substantial practical importance in international litigation. The importance derives from the role of judicial jurisdiction in deciding forums in which an international disputes can be litigated. Therefore, making contracts, it is very important to make clear agreements in international jurisdictions as forum selection has vital consequences for results of many international disputes.
      번역하기

      It is said that no less than companies attempt to do joint research and study with universities or research centers. Therefore, it is common to have joint ownership with joint parties. On the other hand, lots of companies have struggled with bankrup...

      It is said that no less than companies attempt to do joint research and study with universities or research centers. Therefore, it is common to have joint ownership with joint parties. On the other hand, lots of companies have struggled with bankruptcy since economy slump in 1998, so it is inevitable to claim on the basis of the joint ownership of patent rights.
      On the legal construction of joint ownership, a common view gives an explanation that joint ownership is a situation for ownership to be belong to the number of people being dived quantitively. Partition claim right is one-sided claim right that does away with existing part-owners relation over all or partially and generates legal relation dividing common property to each joint owners.
      In relation to judicial precedents basing on the theory of ownerships competition and on the theory of quantitive dividing, joint ownership disputes have increased. As it is, it became necessary to protect patent rights. According to the case law in this disputes, it is clear to have judgment on the ground of joint ownership rules.
      The intellectual property law has becomes a precondition affecting national competitiveness in 21st century. However, it is totally different even if each country has holed a patent law. That"s why it is confronted by forum shopping among international lawyers of the intellectual property.
      Judicial jurisdiction has substantial practical importance in international litigation. The importance derives from the role of judicial jurisdiction in deciding forums in which an international disputes can be litigated. Therefore, making contracts, it is very important to make clear agreements in international jurisdictions as forum selection has vital consequences for results of many international disputes.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서설
      • Ⅱ. 공동발명의 주체와 발생원인
      • Ⅲ. 공동발명에 대한 관리
      • Ⅳ. 공동발명자의 쟁송상 지위
      • V. 국제적 공동발명과 관련한 문제
      • Ⅰ. 서설
      • Ⅱ. 공동발명의 주체와 발생원인
      • Ⅲ. 공동발명에 대한 관리
      • Ⅳ. 공동발명자의 쟁송상 지위
      • V. 국제적 공동발명과 관련한 문제
      • Ⅵ. 결론
      • 【참고문헌】
      • [Abstract]
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "지적재산권법(상)" 육법사 1999

      2 "지적 재산권법" 홍문사 2004

      3 "지식재산권법의 제문제" 지식재산권법연구회 2005

      4 "실통본 민사소송법" 신영사 2006

      5 "금전배상 이외의 손해배상과 그 적용례" 고려대학교 법학연구소 33 : 1997

      6 "국제특허분쟁의 소송절차적 대응전략" 1 (1): 2004

      7 "국제재판관할에 관한 연구" 1999

      8 "국제민사소송전략" 신영사 1997

      9 "miller/Michael H Davis, Intellectual Property, 3rd" West group 2000

      10 "Patent Litigation &Strategy" West group 1999

      1 "지적재산권법(상)" 육법사 1999

      2 "지적 재산권법" 홍문사 2004

      3 "지식재산권법의 제문제" 지식재산권법연구회 2005

      4 "실통본 민사소송법" 신영사 2006

      5 "금전배상 이외의 손해배상과 그 적용례" 고려대학교 법학연구소 33 : 1997

      6 "국제특허분쟁의 소송절차적 대응전략" 1 (1): 2004

      7 "국제재판관할에 관한 연구" 1999

      8 "국제민사소송전략" 신영사 1997

      9 "miller/Michael H Davis, Intellectual Property, 3rd" West group 2000

      10 "Patent Litigation &Strategy" West group 1999

      11 "Forum Sopping and Venue in Transnational Litigation" Oxford university press 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.11 1.11 1.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.99 0.99 1.176 0.45
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼