RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      고형암 환자에 있어서 조혈세포 촉진인자의 사용시점에 관한 현황과 적정 투여시점에 대한 고찰 = Drug Use Status and Optimal Administration Time of Colony-Stimulating Factor(CSF) for Solid Cancer Patients

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82381961

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The neutropenia is one of the most critical adverse effects of chemotherapy. Prophylaxis of neutropenia is very important because neutropenic patients are susceptible to infection, which is one of the leading cause of death. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that CSF as prophylactic should be given 24 to 72 hours after the administration of myelotoxic chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the CSF administration timing and clinical effectiveness of CSF on neutropenia prophylaxis according to initiating time. Data were collected retrospectively from Electronic Medical Record of solid cancer patients who have been administrated prophylactic CSF after chemotherapy in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from January 1st to June 30th in 2007. Patients were divided into two different groups, based on timing of CSF initiation after chemotherapy. One group being administrated CSF within 24 hours and another group after 24 hours. Related parameters such as age, diagnosis, chemo-regimen and chemotherapy history as well as ANC, development of fever, infection, antibiotic use, and delay to next chemotherapy were investigated. 79 cases were enrolled, and 55 cases were within 24 hours and 24 cases were after 24 hours. Hematology-oncology patients were administrated CSF after 24 hours in most cases, Obstetrics and gynecology(OBGY) patients were administrated it in the same day when chemotherapy finished then there were more cases that CSF was given within 24 hours in OBGY. From two groups we found 8 cases (14.5%), 7 cases (29.2%) of neutropenia in group within 24 hours and after 24 hours, 7 cases (12.7%), 3 cases (23.5%) of fever, 2 cases(3.6%), 1 case(4.2%) of infection and 6 cases (10.9%), 5 cases (20.9%) of antibiotics usage. 7 cases (3 patients, 12.7%) and 0 case of delay to next chemotherapy as a result of neutropenia were found. No statistical difference could be observed. There were more cases of multi-organ metastasis and antitumor agent dose reduction demands in patients’group who experienced neutropenia. These patients were at worse performance state, and were to be considered as more important factors that influenced neutropenia. Universal recommendation on optimal timing of CSF initiation cannot be made and no statistical difference was found in this study. In the future detailed classification of patients can be conducted in another experiments to enhance the study over this subject.
      번역하기

      The neutropenia is one of the most critical adverse effects of chemotherapy. Prophylaxis of neutropenia is very important because neutropenic patients are susceptible to infection, which is one of the leading cause of death. American Society of Clinic...

      The neutropenia is one of the most critical adverse effects of chemotherapy. Prophylaxis of neutropenia is very important because neutropenic patients are susceptible to infection, which is one of the leading cause of death. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that CSF as prophylactic should be given 24 to 72 hours after the administration of myelotoxic chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the CSF administration timing and clinical effectiveness of CSF on neutropenia prophylaxis according to initiating time. Data were collected retrospectively from Electronic Medical Record of solid cancer patients who have been administrated prophylactic CSF after chemotherapy in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from January 1st to June 30th in 2007. Patients were divided into two different groups, based on timing of CSF initiation after chemotherapy. One group being administrated CSF within 24 hours and another group after 24 hours. Related parameters such as age, diagnosis, chemo-regimen and chemotherapy history as well as ANC, development of fever, infection, antibiotic use, and delay to next chemotherapy were investigated. 79 cases were enrolled, and 55 cases were within 24 hours and 24 cases were after 24 hours. Hematology-oncology patients were administrated CSF after 24 hours in most cases, Obstetrics and gynecology(OBGY) patients were administrated it in the same day when chemotherapy finished then there were more cases that CSF was given within 24 hours in OBGY. From two groups we found 8 cases (14.5%), 7 cases (29.2%) of neutropenia in group within 24 hours and after 24 hours, 7 cases (12.7%), 3 cases (23.5%) of fever, 2 cases(3.6%), 1 case(4.2%) of infection and 6 cases (10.9%), 5 cases (20.9%) of antibiotics usage. 7 cases (3 patients, 12.7%) and 0 case of delay to next chemotherapy as a result of neutropenia were found. No statistical difference could be observed. There were more cases of multi-organ metastasis and antitumor agent dose reduction demands in patients’group who experienced neutropenia. These patients were at worse performance state, and were to be considered as more important factors that influenced neutropenia. Universal recommendation on optimal timing of CSF initiation cannot be made and no statistical difference was found in this study. In the future detailed classification of patients can be conducted in another experiments to enhance the study over this subject.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김정숙, "항암요법을 받은 암환자에서의 감염 및 치료 경향" 17 (17): 481-, 2000

      2 Howard Ozer, "Somerfield for the American Society of Clinical Oncology Growth Factors Expert Panel. : 2000 update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines" 18 : 3558-, 2000

      3 G. Koumakis, "Optimal timing(Preemptive versus supportive) of Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration following high-dose cyclophosphamide" 56 (56): 28-, 1999

      4 "NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology" 1 : 2008

      5 Nila Bhana, "Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: evidence based review" 19 : 328-, 2007

      6 김보영, "Filgrastim의 약물사용 평가" 13 (13): 126-, 1996

      7 Rebecca B. Donohue, "Development of a neutropenia riskassessment tool" 3 (3): 62-, 2005

      8 "American Society of Clinical OncologyL Recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines" 12 : 2471-, 1994

      9 Thomas J. Smith, "2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: An evidence-based clinical practice guideline" 24 : 2006

      1 김정숙, "항암요법을 받은 암환자에서의 감염 및 치료 경향" 17 (17): 481-, 2000

      2 Howard Ozer, "Somerfield for the American Society of Clinical Oncology Growth Factors Expert Panel. : 2000 update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines" 18 : 3558-, 2000

      3 G. Koumakis, "Optimal timing(Preemptive versus supportive) of Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration following high-dose cyclophosphamide" 56 (56): 28-, 1999

      4 "NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology" 1 : 2008

      5 Nila Bhana, "Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: evidence based review" 19 : 328-, 2007

      6 김보영, "Filgrastim의 약물사용 평가" 13 (13): 126-, 1996

      7 Rebecca B. Donohue, "Development of a neutropenia riskassessment tool" 3 (3): 62-, 2005

      8 "American Society of Clinical OncologyL Recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines" 12 : 2471-, 1994

      9 Thomas J. Smith, "2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: An evidence-based clinical practice guideline" 24 : 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-07-02 학회명변경 한글명 : 병원약사회 -> 한국병원약사회
      영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society of Health-System Pharmacists
      KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.04 0.04 0.04
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.05 0.05 0.27 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼