시각문화교육의 정의와 담론 구분에 대한 연구 = Clarifying the Discourses of Visual Culture Education

국문 초록 (Abstract)

  본 연구는 시각문화교육의 필요성이 확대되는 최근 연구를 검토하며 우리 교육 현실에 적합한 시각문화교육의 이론을 구성하기 위한 기초 연구의 성격을 갖는다. 즉 시각문화교육의 개념에 대한 정의로부터 시각문화교육으로 불리고 언급되는 미술교육 담론들에 대한 검토와 분석을 통해 그것을 보는 관점을 구성하고자 한다. 연구자는 시각문화교육이 대중문화중심담론, 생활중심담론, 미디어중심담론의 틀에서 조명될 수 있으며. 각 담론의 장단점을 이해함으로써 보다 향상된 시각문화교육 이론 형성에 기여할 수 있다고 주장한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  This study examines how art education reacts to the changing social environment as visual culture becomes prevalent. Visual culture education constitutes the discourses which insist the need to understand and to be aware of the new media environment such as popular culture, art and life. I distinguished the discourses of visual culture education into popular culture-based discourse. life-based discourse, media-based discourse. The perspective on visual culture education depends on the phenomenal aspect. relation with life. the interest in the visual language of visual culture. This can be termed as education about visual culture. education through visual culture, education of visual culture. The popular culture-based discourse aims for the proper understanding on visual culture phenomena. This aims to raise critical awareness on popular culture. to build the ability of the visual communication through visual language, and to educate as a member of democratic society through the link of extra-school experiences and within school education.<BR>  The life-based discourse understands visual culture education as a process to enhance the understanding of individual lives in order to diversify the experiences. to respect different ways of lives and to increase social understanding and cooperation through art. This will grow the ability to experience. question and change the world and link between people. The media-based discourse aims to grow the ability to use the media, to analyze. understand and interpret the visual culture media by focusing on the wide influences of media. Through the education of digital media. the learners can become familiar with media environment.<BR>  I tried to show that visual culture education is related with the ontological growth of learners. synthesis of life and art. creation of new visual language offering enormous educational possibilities. Visual culture education. not merely the academic discipline on visual culture. concerns the multiple relations of life as education strives to realize life.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 〈요약〉
  Ⅰ. 서론
  Ⅱ. 시각문화교육의 정의
  Ⅲ. 시각문화교육의 담론 구분
  Ⅳ. 시각문화교육의 가능한 지향점
  Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
  【참고문헌】
  【Abstract】
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Deleuze, G., "천 개의 고원" 새물결 2001

2 심광현, "이제는 문화교육이다" 문화과학사 2003

3 김황기, "시각문화 미술교육에 대한 고찰" 한국미술교육학회 16 : 31-46, 2003

4 황연주, "시각문화 교육의 일환으로써 디지털 영상에 관한 연구" 한국미술교육학회 13 : 29-64, 2002

5 Eisner, E., "새로운 눈으로 보는 미술교육" 예경 1995

6 김성숙, "미술교육과 문화" 학지사 2007

7 교육인적자원부, "미술과 교육과정. 교육인적자원부 고시 제2007-79호"

8 한숭희, "대중문화학습: 현대문화연구와 성인학습연구의 접합" 한국교육인류학회 1 (1): 157-184, 1998

9 Mcfee J., "Why do we teach art in the public schools?" 9 (9): 1-4, 1968

10 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, "Wahrheit und Methode" 1960

11 Bolin, P., "Visual culture: Seven statements of support for material culture" 44 (44): 246-263, 2003

12 Dikovitskaya, M., "Visual Culture: The Study of the Visual after the Cultural Turn" MIT Press 2005

13 Marshall, "Truth and method" Continuum Publishing Company 1989

14 Gattegno, C., "Towards a visual culture: Educating through television" Outerbridge and Dienstfrey 1969

15 Lanier, V., "The teaching of art as social revolution" 50 (50): 314-319, 1969

16 Wilson, B., "The superheroes of J. C. Holz plus an outline of a theory of child art" 16 (16): 2-9, 1974

17 Freedman, K., "Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art" Teachers College Columbia University 2003

18 Krug, D., "Teaching art in the contexts of everyday life, in Contemporary Issues in Art Education" Prentice Hall 180-197, 2002

19 Krug, D., "Symbolic Culture and Art Education" 56 (56): 13-19, 2003

20 Chapman, L., "Subject matter of the study of art" 20 (20): 20-22, 1967

21 Taylor, P., "Service-learning as postmodern art and pedagogy" 43 (43): 124-140, 2002

22 Mcfee J., "Preparation for art" Wadsworth 1970

23 Wilson, B., "Of diagrams and rhizomes: Visual culture, Contemporary art, and the impossibility of mapping the content of art education" 44 (44): 214-229, 2003

24 Lanier, V., "Newer media and the teaching of art" 19 (19): 4-8, 1966

25 Taylor, P., "Madonna and hypertext: Liberatory learning in art education" 41 (41): 376-389, 2000

26 Krug, D., "Leadership and research: Reimagining electronic technologies for supporting learning through the visual arts" 46 (46): 3-5, 2004

27 Taylor, P., "Hyperaesthetics: Making sense of our technomediated world" 45 (45): 328-342, 2004

28 Tavin, K., "Hauntological shifts: Fear and loathing of popular (visual) culture" 46 (46): 101-117, 2005

29 Stokrocki, M., "Go to the mall an get it all: Adolescents' aesthetic value in the shopping mall" 54 (54): 18-24, 2001

30 Stankiewicz, M., "Discipline and the future of art education" 41 (41): 301-313, 2000

31 Stokrocki, M., "Contexts for teaching art, in Handbook of research and policy in art education" Lawrence Erlbaum 439-466, 2004

32 Gaudelius, Y., "Contemporary issues in art education" Prentice Hall 2002

33 tokrocki, M., "Computer animation at an Apache children's use of computer animation technology, in Contemporary issues in art education" Prentice Hall 264-274, 2002

34 Duncum, P., "Clarifying Visual Culture Art Education" 55 (55): 6-11, 2002

35 Eisenhauer, J., "Beyond bombardment: ‘Subjectivity, visual culture, and art education’" 47 (47): 155-169, 2006

36 Efland, A., "Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum" Teachers College Press 2002

37 Chapman, L., "Approaches to art in education" Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1978

38 Mirzoeff, N., "An introduction to visual culture" Routledg 1999

39 Duncum, P., "A case for an art education of everyday aesthetic experiences" 40 (40): 295-311, 1999