유치진의 숀 오케이시 수용에 대한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The aim of this paper is to clarify the difference, comparing The Study of Sean O’casey, Yu Chijin’s graduation thesis with Sean O’casey, A Dramatist and Former Laborer which published in The Joseonilbo, a newspaper and to explain the reasons why he accepted Sean O’casey and the characteristics of his acceptance.
Yu Chijin’s graduation thesis consisted of two parts, Sean O’casey’s biological introduction and the special features of his performance. He wrote that since Sean O’casey supported Irish laborer classes actively, he came to suffer oppression from Irish nationalists. He also made much of Juno and the Paycock as the work which described well the reality of laborer who was in the sadness through farcical technique.
In the article published in The Joseonilbo, Yu Chijin tried to explain Sean O’casey’s special features from theatrical people’s point of view who worked in colonized Chos?n. He explained that because Sean O’casey knew exactly Irish audience’s taste of drama, he gained high popularity and the farcical elements of drama became his distinguishing characteristics. He also appreciated that Sean O’casey made the most of the case which didn’t show in the stage and succeeded in intensifying the theme of drama.
The reasons why Yu Chijin accepted Sean O’casey had difference according to the time of acceptance. He was interested in Sean O’casey from the anarchistic point of view when he studied in the university of Rikkyo in Japan. At that time he judged Sean o’casey as the writer with the same viewpoint as himself. After returning home, he gave attention to Sean O’casey’s eminent techniques of playwriting which insured easily the popularity of performance. It was because he thought of these techniques as the useful method of creation under the Japanese censorship in colonized Chos?n. The acceptance like this came to have great influence on his drama. So Yu Chijin’s ‘Romantic Realism drama’ which he insisted in the late of 1930s was his own creating techniques made from Sean O’casey’s characteristics.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2.『숀 오케이시 연구』와 릿쿄(立?)대학생 유치진
• 3.『노동자 출신의 극작가 숀 오케이시』와 극예술연구회의 유치진
• 4. 유치진에게 있어서 숀 오케이시의 의미－마무리를 겸하여
• 참고문헌
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 金牡蘭, "｢われわれ｣のアイルランド－日本と植民地朝鮮におけるアイルランド文学の<移動> －" 筑波大学文学 2007

2 김재석, "한국 근대극 성립에 미친 ｢극예술협회｣의 영향" 국어국문학회 (156) : 207-240, 2010

3 김재석, "토월회의 번역극 공연인식과 그 의미" 국어국문학회 (168) : 297-335, 2014

4 이정숙, "일제강점기 유치진 희곡 연구 : 관객지향성을 중심으로" 경북대학교 대학원 2010

5 김재석, "일제강점기 사회극 연구" 태학사 1995

6 鄭大鎬, "유치환의 시 연구 : 아나키즘과 세계인식의 관련양상을 중심으로" 경북대학교대학원 1996

7 김재석, "유치진의 초기 희곡과 연극론의 거리" (58) : 191-216, 1996

8 여석기, "유치진과 애란연극" (여름) : 5-20, 1974

9 김용수, "애란의 신극작가 － 샨, 오케씨의 희곡"

10 권오만, "애란연극운동과 극예술연구회 : 유치진에 미친 Synge, O’Casey의 영향을 중심으로" 한국비교문학회 7 : 59-84, 1982

11 유치진, "숀 오케이시와 나 : 내가 사숙하는 내외작가"

12 장원재, "숀 오케이시(Sean O'Casey)와 유치진(柳致眞)의 영향관계 연구 -유치진의 평문 「숀 오케이시와 나: 내가 사숙하는 내외 작가」를 중심으로" 국제어문학회 (32) : 265-295, 2004

13 홍유미, "숀 오케이시 희곡선집" 이화여자대학교출판부 2012

14 유치진, "동랑자서전" 서문당 1975

15 유치진, "노동자 출신의 극작가 숀 오케이시"

16 유치환, "구름에 그린다" 신흥출판사 1959

17 山本修二, "近代劇精髓" 新潮社 1925

18 山本修二, "英米現代劇の動向" 創元社 1932

19 立教学院百二十五史編纂委員会, "立教学院百二十五史資料編3巻" 学校法人立教学院 1999

20 秋山淸, "日本の反逆思想" 現代思潮社 1968

21 勝田孝興, "世界戯曲全集 九卷" 世界戯曲全集刊行会 1928

22 柳致眞, "シヨ－ンオケエシイ研究－チュウノと公爵" 立教大学英米文学会 2 (2): 1931

23 柳致眞, "シヨ－ンオケエシイ研究－チュウノと公爵" 立教大学英米文学会 2 (2): 1932

24 杉山寿美子, "アベイ․シアタ－1904－2004" 研究社 2004

25 Hunt, Hugh, "The Abbey－lreland's National Theatre1904－1979" Columbia University Press 1979

26 Krause, David, "Sean O’casey and His World" Thames & Hudson Ltd 1976

27 Smith, B. L, "O’Casey Satiric Vision" The Kent State University Press 1978

28 Demastes, William W, "Irish Playwrights, 1880－1995: A Research and Production Sourcebook" Greenwood Press 1997