RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      전환기 국제질서와 독일 외교의 변화 = The World Order in Transition and the Shift of German Foreign Policy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106378744

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Germany is a power house in Europe, but it has shown a paradox that does not show off its power but pursue a low-profile foreign policy. This behavior has persisted even after unification. This article examines whether the German foreign policy continues to maintain such patterns in the midst of the recent shift of the international normative order. The analysis has reached a conclusion that Germany does not avoid conflict with major powers. The German foreign policy is changing at two levels: First, it is expanding from regional diplomacy focused on Europe to global diplomacy. Thus, the focus of diplomacy is expanding from the EU and NATO to the EU and the United Nations. Second, its behavior is changing from a low-profile diplomacy to an assertive diplomacy with a strong voice.
      번역하기

      Germany is a power house in Europe, but it has shown a paradox that does not show off its power but pursue a low-profile foreign policy. This behavior has persisted even after unification. This article examines whether the German foreign policy contin...

      Germany is a power house in Europe, but it has shown a paradox that does not show off its power but pursue a low-profile foreign policy. This behavior has persisted even after unification. This article examines whether the German foreign policy continues to maintain such patterns in the midst of the recent shift of the international normative order. The analysis has reached a conclusion that Germany does not avoid conflict with major powers. The German foreign policy is changing at two levels: First, it is expanding from regional diplomacy focused on Europe to global diplomacy. Thus, the focus of diplomacy is expanding from the EU and NATO to the EU and the United Nations. Second, its behavior is changing from a low-profile diplomacy to an assertive diplomacy with a strong voice.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이규영, "통일 이후 독일 외교정책의 변화: 패권국가 가능성을 중심으로" 한국정치정보학회 14 (14): 1-21, 2011

      2 고상두, "연립정부의 내적 정책갈등 관리메커니즘: 독일의 사례분석" 한국유럽학회 33 (33): 129-151, 2015

      3 Saarbrücker Zeitung, "Wir wollen keinen neuen Nationalismus, sondern mehr internationale Zusammenarbeit"

      4 DPA, "Wir müssen die Beziehungen neu ausbalancieren"

      5 Bild am Sonntag, "Wir müssen Gesicht zeigen gegen Neonazis und Antisemiten"

      6 Rheinische Post, "Wir haben nur als geeintes Europa eine Chance"

      7 The German Times, "Wir haben keine Zeit zu verlieren"

      8 Süddeutsche Zeitung, "Wir dürfen uns nicht wegducken"

      9 Saarbrücker Zeitung, "Wir dürfen antisemitischen und rassistischen Ressentiments keinen Fuß breit Platz lassen"

      10 Bild, "Wir appellieren an London, einen Ausweg zu suchen"

      1 이규영, "통일 이후 독일 외교정책의 변화: 패권국가 가능성을 중심으로" 한국정치정보학회 14 (14): 1-21, 2011

      2 고상두, "연립정부의 내적 정책갈등 관리메커니즘: 독일의 사례분석" 한국유럽학회 33 (33): 129-151, 2015

      3 Saarbrücker Zeitung, "Wir wollen keinen neuen Nationalismus, sondern mehr internationale Zusammenarbeit"

      4 DPA, "Wir müssen die Beziehungen neu ausbalancieren"

      5 Bild am Sonntag, "Wir müssen Gesicht zeigen gegen Neonazis und Antisemiten"

      6 Rheinische Post, "Wir haben nur als geeintes Europa eine Chance"

      7 The German Times, "Wir haben keine Zeit zu verlieren"

      8 Süddeutsche Zeitung, "Wir dürfen uns nicht wegducken"

      9 Saarbrücker Zeitung, "Wir dürfen antisemitischen und rassistischen Ressentiments keinen Fuß breit Platz lassen"

      10 Bild, "Wir appellieren an London, einen Ausweg zu suchen"

      11 Rhein-Neckar-Zeitung, "Wir Europäer müssen uns mehr um uns selbst kümmern"

      12 Joong-ang Ilbo, "Wer in einer globalisierten Welt etwas erreichen will, der braucht verlässliche Partner"

      13 Märkische Allgemeine, "Trump darf uns nicht spalten"

      14 Anderson, Jeffrey J., "Transatlantic Perspective" American Institute for Contemporary German Studies 2009

      15 Waltz, Kenneth, "Theory of International Politics" University Michigan Press 1979

      16 Crawford, Beverly, "The Puzzle of Persistence and Power: Explaining Germany’s Normative Foreign Policy" 26 (26): 2017

      17 Katzenstein, Peter J., "Tamed Power: Germany in Europe" Cornell University Press 1997

      18 Kortunov, Andrei, "Russia’s New Foreign Policy Cycle Explained"

      19 Krause, Joachim, "Multilateralism: behind European Views" 27 (27): 2004

      20 Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung, "Mit diplomatischen Mitteln lösen"

      21 Risse, Thomas, "Kontinuität durch Wandel: Eine neue deutsche Aussenpolitik?" 11 (11): 2004

      22 "Koalitionvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD, Ein neuer Aufbruch für Europa, Eine neue Dynamik für Deutschland. Einer neuer Zusammenarbeit für unser Land"

      23 Yomiuri Shimbun, "Japan ist für uns ein immer wichtigerer Wertepartner"

      24 Deutschlandfunk, "Großbritannien ist am Zug"

      25 Maull, Hans W., "Germany’s Uncertain Power, Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic" Palgrave Macmillan 2006

      26 Steinmeier, Frank-Walter, "Germany’s New Global Role, Berlin Steps Up"

      27 Kundnai, Hans, "Germany as a Geo-economic Power" 34 (34): 2011

      28 Daehnhardt, Patricia, "German Foreign Policy, the Ukraine Crisis and the Euro-Atlantic Order: Assssing the Dynamics of Change" 27 (27): 2018

      29 Rittberger, Volker, "German Foreign Policy since Unification: an Analysis of Foreign Policy Continuity and Change" University of British Columbia Press 2001

      30 Bild, "Gemeinsam sehr entschlossen für Vielfalt und Toleranz eintreten"

      31 Handelsblatt, "Für eine balancierte transatlantische Partnerschaft"

      32 Ash, Timothy Garton, "Everywhere, the European Project is Stalling. It Needs a New German Engine"

      33 Paulsen, Thomas, "Europa-Handbuch" Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung 1999

      34 Spiegel, "Es geht um eine der rausamsten Massenvernichtungswaffen"

      35 Berliner Morgenpost, "Es geht um die komplette, überprüfbare und irreversible Denuklearisierung Nordkoreas"

      36 Hamburger Abendblatt, "Ein Bündnis zum Erhalt der multilateralen Weltordnung formieren"

      37 Chazan, Guy, "Dismay in Berlin after Mike Pompeo Scraps First Trip to Germany"

      38 Passauer Neue Presse, "Die einzig richtige Antwort ist #EuropeUnited"

      39 ZDF, "Die Zeit wird jetzt knapp"

      40 Frankfurter Allgemeine, "Die Russen brauchen uns, und wir haben unsere Bedingungen dafür klar definiert"

      41 Haftendorn, Helga, "Deutschlands Rückkehr in die Weltpolitik" 60 : 2009

      42 Spiegel, "Den europäischen Pfeiler des transatlantischen Bündnisses stärken"

      43 Wlet am Sonntag, "Das nationale Interesse Deutschlands hat einen Namen: Europa"

      44 Harnisch, Sebastian, "Change and Contituity in Post-unification German Foreign Policy" 10 (10): 2001

      45 Zeit, "Augenbrauen hochziehen reicht nicht"

      46 Otte, Max, "A Rising Middle Power?: German Foreign Policy in Transformation, 1989-1999" St. Martin's Press 1999

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> 21st centry Political Science Review KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 21세기정치학회보
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.3 0.3 0.37
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.37 0.38 0.572 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼