감성적 근대 모색을 위한 초탐- 왕휘의 중국 현대성 담론 소개 = A review on “modernity of emotion” -Introduction of Wang Hui`s discourse on Chinese modernity

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is purposed to give some understanding of ‘modernity of emotion’ by reviewing arguments on Chinese modernity and new Asian imagination. As an introductory approach, the study focuses on the New Left, Wang Hui’s conception of Asia based on Antimodern modernity’ theory and ‘Tributary system’, and introduction of criticism for that. The major issue of the arguments can be summarized as now-here’ China is capitalistic?, the evaluation of the cause of corruption, the Mao Zedong era and Western values, and a view of globalization. There seems to have been an agreement that the West should not be a direct model for Chinese development, and Western knowledge should be converted into Mainland one. But, there was a clear difference in specific points between the Liberal and Left view, which means that a common cognition of the analysis on current Chinese society and its future has gone. Wang Hui tried dual introspection on capitalism and socialismthrough his ‘antimodern modernity’ theory. He showed a way of new thinking of the Chinese problem through reducing the public area in China, criticism for inequality, and socialism and introspection on the culture. And he also let the discourse widened enough to see the Chinese problem newly from a view of global capitalism. He made considerable contribution to deconstruction of dichotomous ideology like modern vs tradition, socialism vs capitalism, and market vs state. But his theory revealed quite a few problems, getting pointed out and criticized. His positive evaluation of the Cultural Revolution and Mao Zedong, and argument of public democracy met criticism which they neglected a question of human dignity and human rights. His attitude which put the authority of the State before that of the public was regarded as his consent to the rationality and superiority of the One Party Rule. Thus, the criticism he emphasized as the core of modernity is quite problematic. It is because criticism can be secured by relative independence from existing power or authority, and depends on keeping a distance from the State. Especially, Wang Hui’s conception of Asia may be quite dangerous. Of course, it can be understood that it was presented to remove the prejudice of China from the outside based on orientalism and to reconstruct “Asia” under the global capitalistic system. But what matters is that his attempt is read as theintension to reconstruct Chinese civilization through modern reinterpretation of the tributary system performed in old emperor systems. Thus, it is required for the conception of Asia to make historical introspection of the tributary system developed under center-periphery relationships, further Asia from a view of the periphery rather than center. By doing so, it is possible to get out of the suspicion of reconstruction of Sino-centric world order.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이승환, "후기 근대 유학담론의 두 유형: 뚜웨이밍(杜維明)과 에임스(Roger Ames)를 중심으로" 서강대학교 동아연구소 36 : 1998

2 丸山眞男, "현대정치의 사상과 행동" 한길사 1997

3 조경란, "현대 중국 지식인 지도" 글항아리 2013

4 임현진, "한국의 근대와 근대성 비판" 역사비평사 2004

5 이욱연, "포스트 사회주의 시대의 중국문화" 서강대학교 출판부 2009

6 최유준, "지식인의 표상" 마티 2012

7 溝囗雄三, "중국현대사의 구조" 청람 1983

8 溝囗雄三, "중국의 예치시스템" 청계 2001

9 汪暉, "죽은 불 다시 살아나" 삼인 2014

10 송인재, "절망에 반항하라" 글항아리 2014

11 丸山眞男, "전중과 전후 사이 1936∼1957" 휴머니스트 2011

12 김상준, "유교의 정치적 무의식" 글항아리 2014

13 송인재, "왕단의 중국현대사" 동아시아 2013

14 송인재, "아시아는 세계다" 글항아리 2011

15 로스 테릴, "새로운 제국-중국" 나남 2005

16 汪暉, "새로운 아시아를 상상한다" 창비 2003

17 錢理群, "모택동시대와 포스트 모택동 시대 (하)" 한울 2012

18 劉曉波, "류사오보 중국을 말하다" 지식 갤러리 2011

19 백영서, "동아시아의 귀환-중국의 근대성을 묻는다" 창작과 비평사 2000

20 김기봉, "동아시아 공동체 만들기" 푸른 역사 2007

21 임현진, "다중적 근대성의 탐구: 비교 문명적 관점" 나남 2009

22 윤여일, "내재하는 아시아" 휴머니스트 2011

23 이주노, "계몽의 자아와해-1990년대 이래 중국사상문화계의 중대 논쟁 연구" 전남대학교출판부 2014

24 杜維明, "儒家傳統的現代轉化" 中國廣播出版社 1993