한국어에 나타나는 ‘한(恨)’의 개념화 양상 = Aspects of the Conceptualization of HAN

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Bang Young-sim & Lee Jeong-hwa. 2007. Aspects of the Conceptualization of HAN. Korean Semantics, 22. From a cognitive linguistics perspective, the purpose of this paper is to examine the Korean people's representative emotional concept, HAN. Based on the corpus data from The National Institute of The Korean Language corpus, this paper aims to show how Koreans conceptualize HAN in terms of conceptual metonymies and metaphors. HAN is regarded as abstract and difficult to define because of the fuzziness of its conceptual boundary. Unlike the basic emotions such as anger, sadness and joy, HAN is not a spontaneously responsive emotion, but is rather a complex blended concept, created over a long period of time, after those basic emotions are accumulated, suppressed or mitigated in the person's mind. For this reason, HAN is shown to reveal much less direct physiological effects (chest-aching, bone-aching and blood-drying) than the basic emotion, anger. Despite the difference, HAN should thus be characterized in close relation to other emotions, because it is based on, and caused by the emotions . The instances of HAN show some aspects of conceptual metonymies such as [Physiological effects of HAN stands for HAN], [Locus of HAN stands for HAN]. It is also argued that HAN is limited to occur in only some of human body parts, i.e., in the chest, in the bone (marrow), and in the blood. The abstract concept, HAN, is conceptualized via various conceptual metaphors such as [HAN IS A THING], [HAN IS LIQUID/SOLID/GASEOUS MATTER IN A CONTAINER], [HAN IS A PLANT], [HAN IS A THREAD], [HAN IS FOOD IN A BODY], [HAN IS DIRT TO BE AVOIDED].

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "환유의 인지적 의미특성" 27 : 223-254, 1995

2 "환유와 은유의 인지적 상관성에 관한 연구" 19 : 169-190, 2001

3 "한국어에서 성욕의 은유적 개념화" 10 (10): 79-104, 2003

4 "한국어 은유 연구" 2000

5 "인지언어학개론" 서울: 태학사 1998

6 "의 구조 연구 문학과 지성사" 1993

7 "은유의 인지언어학적 의미 분석" 28 : 117-150, 1996

8 "은유와 환유의 상호작용" 18 : 275-299, 1998

9 "은유와 광고" 44 (44): 229-246, 2002

10 "은유: 실용 입문서" 한국문화사 2003

11 "문화적 개념의 인지 표상과 활성화 과정: ‘한(恨)’의 담화분석과 온라인 점화효과" 한국심리학회 17 : 1-16, 2003

12 "담화와 비유어" 서울: 한국문화사 2004

13 "관용어, 은유 그리고 환유1" 4 : 61-87, 1997

14 "恨: 한국인의 負的 感情" 6 (6): 61-74, 1997

15 "“‘미움’의 개념화 양상" (72) : 173-201, 2001ㄱ

16 "’의 사회심리학적 개념화 시도" 1991

17 "‘화(火)’의 개념화 양상" 4 : 693-721, 2001ㅁ

18 "‘정’과 ‘한(恨)’의 은유적 개념화" 20 : 91-120, 2006

19 "‘부끄러움’의 개념화 양상" 89 : 27-56, 2005

20 "‘두려움’의 개념화 양상" (252) : 103-143, 2001ㄴ

21 "‘긴장’의 개념화 양상" 8 (8): 205-227, 2001ㄷ

22 "‘기쁨’과 ‘슬픔’의 개념화 양상" 37 : 219-249, 2001ㄹ

23 "What Categories Reveal about the Mind University of Chicago Press" 1987

24 "University of Chicago Press" 1980