RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      공동활동참여도와 공동생활공간만족도의 효과 - 스웨덴 코하우징 거주자의 잠정적 주거조절 틀 속에서 - = Participation in Common Activities and Satisfaction with Common Space - In a Tentative Framework of Housing Adjustment for Swedish Cohousing Residents -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101789711

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study was to find the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in a tentative housing adjustment framework for Swedish cohousing residents, applying the housing adjustment behavior model of Morris and Winter (1978, 1996). The data used for this research were a subset of data Choi and Paulsson (2011) surveyed from 12 Swedish cohousing units. Number of 216 cases whose age was 40 and over were selected and analyzed with Pearson correlations and hierarchical linear regressions by SPSS. The regression analyses included four main concepts as endogenous variables, which were participation in common activities, satisfaction with common space, overall life satisfaction, and intention to move out. The results showed that participation in common activities raised satisfaction with common space and overall life satisfaction but reduced intention to move out. Meanwhile, satisfaction with common space diminished intention to move out but did not impact overall life satisfaction. When overall life satisfaction was added to the final regression model, the direct impacts of security reasons, participation in common activities, and satisfaction with common space on intention to move out disappeared. It may be concluded that participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space acted as intervening variables in the tentative cohousing adjustment framework. Even though this study leaves further research on specifying the framework, it may be noteworthy as a first attempt that explains the flow of main concepts. This study may broaden the possibility of empirical studies to develop an analytical path model of housing adjustment for cohousing residents.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to find the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in a tentative housing adjustment framework for Swedish cohousing residents, applying the housing adjustment behavior model of Morr...

      The purpose of this study was to find the role of participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space in a tentative housing adjustment framework for Swedish cohousing residents, applying the housing adjustment behavior model of Morris and Winter (1978, 1996). The data used for this research were a subset of data Choi and Paulsson (2011) surveyed from 12 Swedish cohousing units. Number of 216 cases whose age was 40 and over were selected and analyzed with Pearson correlations and hierarchical linear regressions by SPSS. The regression analyses included four main concepts as endogenous variables, which were participation in common activities, satisfaction with common space, overall life satisfaction, and intention to move out. The results showed that participation in common activities raised satisfaction with common space and overall life satisfaction but reduced intention to move out. Meanwhile, satisfaction with common space diminished intention to move out but did not impact overall life satisfaction. When overall life satisfaction was added to the final regression model, the direct impacts of security reasons, participation in common activities, and satisfaction with common space on intention to move out disappeared. It may be concluded that participation in common activities and satisfaction with common space acted as intervening variables in the tentative cohousing adjustment framework. Even though this study leaves further research on specifying the framework, it may be noteworthy as a first attempt that explains the flow of main concepts. This study may broaden the possibility of empirical studies to develop an analytical path model of housing adjustment for cohousing residents.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최정신, "스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징 주민의 이주동기와생활만족도의 성별 차이" 한국가정관리학회 24 (24): 117-128, 2006

      2 최정신, "스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징 주민의 이주동기" 대한건축학회 19 (19): 129-138, 2003

      3 최정신, "스웨덴과 덴마크 노인용 코하우징 주민의 생활만족도 비교" 한국주거학회 16 (16): 149-160, 2005

      4 최정신, "스웨덴 코하우징의 물리적 환경 디자인 평가" 한국 스칸디나비아학회 13 (13): 115-150, 2012

      5 최정신, "스웨덴 노인용 코하우징 주민의 이주동기의 시계열적 차이 : 2001~2010년 10년간의 차이를 중심으로" 한국가정관리학회 31 (31): 81-92, 2013

      6 김혜연, "베이비부머의 은퇴 후 선호하는 주택특성에 관한 연구 - 서울 강남지역 공동주택거주자를 대상으로 -" 한국주거학회 21 (21): 83-92, 2010

      7 Choi, J., "Why do people move to cohousing communities in Sweden?" 1-10, 2011

      8 최정신, "Why Do People Move to Cohousing Communities in Sweden? - Are there any Significant Differences Between the +40 Cohousing and the Mixed-Age Cohousing?" 대한건축학회 15 (15): 77-86, 2013

      9 Durrett, C., "The Senior Cohousing handbook: A Community Approach to Independent Living" New Society Publishers 2009

      10 Choi, J., "Planning and Implementation of Scandinavian Senior Cohousing Projects" Jipmundang 2006

      1 최정신, "스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징 주민의 이주동기와생활만족도의 성별 차이" 한국가정관리학회 24 (24): 117-128, 2006

      2 최정신, "스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징 주민의 이주동기" 대한건축학회 19 (19): 129-138, 2003

      3 최정신, "스웨덴과 덴마크 노인용 코하우징 주민의 생활만족도 비교" 한국주거학회 16 (16): 149-160, 2005

      4 최정신, "스웨덴 코하우징의 물리적 환경 디자인 평가" 한국 스칸디나비아학회 13 (13): 115-150, 2012

      5 최정신, "스웨덴 노인용 코하우징 주민의 이주동기의 시계열적 차이 : 2001~2010년 10년간의 차이를 중심으로" 한국가정관리학회 31 (31): 81-92, 2013

      6 김혜연, "베이비부머의 은퇴 후 선호하는 주택특성에 관한 연구 - 서울 강남지역 공동주택거주자를 대상으로 -" 한국주거학회 21 (21): 83-92, 2010

      7 Choi, J., "Why do people move to cohousing communities in Sweden?" 1-10, 2011

      8 최정신, "Why Do People Move to Cohousing Communities in Sweden? - Are there any Significant Differences Between the +40 Cohousing and the Mixed-Age Cohousing?" 대한건축학회 15 (15): 77-86, 2013

      9 Durrett, C., "The Senior Cohousing handbook: A Community Approach to Independent Living" New Society Publishers 2009

      10 Choi, J., "Planning and Implementation of Scandinavian Senior Cohousing Projects" Jipmundang 2006

      11 Morris, E.W., "Housing, Family, and Society" Unpublished manuscripts 1996

      12 Morris, E.W., "Housing, Family, and Society" John Wiley & Sons 1978

      13 Russell, L., "Housing Options for Older People" Age Concern 2000

      14 Vestbro, D. U., "From collective housing to cohousing : A summary of research" 17 (17): 164-177, 2000

      15 최정신, "Evaluation of Common Activity and Life in Swedish Cohousing Units" 대한가정학회 12 (12): 133-146, 2011

      16 Williams, J., "Designing neighborhoods for social interaction : The case of cohousing" 10 (10): 195-227, 2006

      17 Housing Study Group, "Cohousing in the World" Kyomoonsa 2000

      18 Meltzer, G., "Cohousing in Britain" Diggers & Dreamers Publications 43-58, 2011

      19 Brenton, M., "Cohousing in Britain" Diggers & Dreamers Publications 115-124, 2011

      20 Kim, C., "Characteristics Analyses of Housing Demands for Baby Boom Generation" Korea Housing Institute 2012

      21 Jung, K., "Baby Boomers’ Demographic Profiles and Welfare Needs" The Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs 2010

      22 Glass, A. P., "Aging in a community of mutual support: The emergence of an elder intentional cohousing community in the United States" 23 (23): 283-303, 2009

      23 Im, G., "A study on residential mobility of baby boomers in Korea" 1-10, 2011

      24 Glass, A.P., "A conceptual model for aging better together intentionally" 27 : 428-442, 2013

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.52 0.52 0.51
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.54 0.53 0.797 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼