RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      문장 구조의 다양성과 복잡성 = Diversity and complexity of sentence strucrure

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82380997

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper has two aims. One is to modify my previous model(henceforth Parser-2008) in order to make it more efficient. The other is to discuss ways to extract crucial information from corpus that have been syntactically tagged using my revised model(henceforth Parser-2009). In order to revise Parser-2008, I need to introduce a new marker `X` to represent a sentence constituent which has no grammatical function in a sentence. In addition, contrary to Parser-2008, I suggest that the number of arguments be added to the information of their predicates instead of giving up marking deleted arguments. I parsed a short novel using Parser-2009, from which I extracted crucial information. Firstly, it is very interesting that while diversity of sentence structure depends on matrix clauses, its complexity relies on embedded clauses. In the horizontal connection between sentences, the degree of complexity of the first sentence is lower than that of the last, and the complexity of the last sentence in a previous paragraph is higher than that of the first in the next paragraph. In a complex sentence which has more than one embedded clause, the degree of complexity of the matrix clause is higher than the deepest embedded clause, with the first embedded clause being the most complex, and the last one the least. In the horizontal and vertical connection between sentences, the types such as [ACE], [ABE], and [AE] are the most dominant links, and the degree of diversity within the links of matrix clauses is higher than that of the embedded clauses as well.

      번역하기

      This paper has two aims. One is to modify my previous model(henceforth Parser-2008) in order to make it more efficient. The other is to discuss ways to extract crucial information from corpus that have been syntactically tagged using my revised model(...

      This paper has two aims. One is to modify my previous model(henceforth Parser-2008) in order to make it more efficient. The other is to discuss ways to extract crucial information from corpus that have been syntactically tagged using my revised model(henceforth Parser-2009). In order to revise Parser-2008, I need to introduce a new marker `X` to represent a sentence constituent which has no grammatical function in a sentence. In addition, contrary to Parser-2008, I suggest that the number of arguments be added to the information of their predicates instead of giving up marking deleted arguments. I parsed a short novel using Parser-2009, from which I extracted crucial information. Firstly, it is very interesting that while diversity of sentence structure depends on matrix clauses, its complexity relies on embedded clauses. In the horizontal connection between sentences, the degree of complexity of the first sentence is lower than that of the last, and the complexity of the last sentence in a previous paragraph is higher than that of the first in the next paragraph. In a complex sentence which has more than one embedded clause, the degree of complexity of the matrix clause is higher than the deepest embedded clause, with the first embedded clause being the most complex, and the last one the least. In the horizontal and vertical connection between sentences, the types such as [ACE], [ABE], and [AE] are the most dominant links, and the degree of diversity within the links of matrix clauses is higher than that of the embedded clauses as well.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼