RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      안정화된 만성 정신분열병 환자에서 주관적 삶의 질에 미치는 Haloperidol과 Risperidone의 영향

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105321728

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Objective:The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of haloperidol and risperidone on the
      quality of life in chronic schizophrenic patients and to identify how the quality of life is related with the
      severity of psychopathology and drug side effects.
      Methods:The study sample was composed of 38 ambulatory patients on haloperidol 1.5-4.5mg/day
      and 33 patients on risperidone 1-4mg/day for more than 2 years. They were physically healthy and had
      diagnoses of chronic undifferentiated or residual type of schizophrenia according to the criteria of DSM-
      Ⅳ. Those who had other comorbid mental disorders were excluded. For the assessment of the quality of
      life(QOL), the Korean version of WHOQOL was used. The severity of psychotic symptoms was evaluated
      by BPRS, and the side effects of the medication was evaluated by UKU Side Effects Rating Scales.
      Results:The results showed that sex, age, education level, marital states, duration of antipsychotic
      medication and BPRS scores were not significantly different between the haloperidol group and risperidone
      group. But, the UKU Side Effects Rating Scales scores in the haloperidol group were significantly higher
      than those in the risperidone group. The mean score of the WHOQOL-BREF in the risperidone group
      was a little higher than that in the haloperidol group, and in the same way the 3 domain scores of the
      WHOQOL-BREF(physical, psychological, environmental domains) in the risperidone group was a little
      higher than those in the haloperidol group. However, the differences were not statistically significant
      between the two groups. There was a negative correlation between total QOL score and total BPRS scores,
      and both between BPRS item of tension and the total QOL score and between depressive mood and total
      QOL score. But, there was no correlation between total QOL score and UKU side effect scores.
      Conclusions:This study suggests that, if schizophrenia has once become chronic, the quality of life
      is not significantly influenced by the kind of antipsychotic drugs in the maintenance dose, and that the
      quality of life is correlated with a severity of the symptoms, especially tension and depressive mood.
      번역하기

      Objective:The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of haloperidol and risperidone on the quality of life in chronic schizophrenic patients and to identify how the quality of life is related with the severity of psychopathology and drug si...

      Objective:The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of haloperidol and risperidone on the
      quality of life in chronic schizophrenic patients and to identify how the quality of life is related with the
      severity of psychopathology and drug side effects.
      Methods:The study sample was composed of 38 ambulatory patients on haloperidol 1.5-4.5mg/day
      and 33 patients on risperidone 1-4mg/day for more than 2 years. They were physically healthy and had
      diagnoses of chronic undifferentiated or residual type of schizophrenia according to the criteria of DSM-
      Ⅳ. Those who had other comorbid mental disorders were excluded. For the assessment of the quality of
      life(QOL), the Korean version of WHOQOL was used. The severity of psychotic symptoms was evaluated
      by BPRS, and the side effects of the medication was evaluated by UKU Side Effects Rating Scales.
      Results:The results showed that sex, age, education level, marital states, duration of antipsychotic
      medication and BPRS scores were not significantly different between the haloperidol group and risperidone
      group. But, the UKU Side Effects Rating Scales scores in the haloperidol group were significantly higher
      than those in the risperidone group. The mean score of the WHOQOL-BREF in the risperidone group
      was a little higher than that in the haloperidol group, and in the same way the 3 domain scores of the
      WHOQOL-BREF(physical, psychological, environmental domains) in the risperidone group was a little
      higher than those in the haloperidol group. However, the differences were not statistically significant
      between the two groups. There was a negative correlation between total QOL score and total BPRS scores,
      and both between BPRS item of tension and the total QOL score and between depressive mood and total
      QOL score. But, there was no correlation between total QOL score and UKU side effect scores.
      Conclusions:This study suggests that, if schizophrenia has once become chronic, the quality of life
      is not significantly influenced by the kind of antipsychotic drugs in the maintenance dose, and that the
      quality of life is correlated with a severity of the symptoms, especially tension and depressive mood.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼