RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Effects of conventional and self-etching adhesive systems on bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to erupted and unerupted teeth = 치아 맹출 유무에 대한 자가부식 접착제에 의한 교정용 부착장치의 접착강도

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82425574

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and failure-mode of orthodontic buttons bonded to erupted and unerupted teeth with conventional and self-etching adhesive systems. Methods: Eighty-four erupted and 84 unerupted, human third-molar teeth were used. For both groups, the buccal surfaces of each tooth were assigned one of the following type of adhesive systems (n = 12). A, Conventional systems: 1, Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA); 2, Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, USA); 3, Single Bond (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA); and B, Self-etching adhesives; 4, Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Okayama, Japan); 5, Transbond Plus (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA); 6, Clearfil S3 (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan); 7, G Bond (GC, Tokyo, Japan). The SBSs of the attachments and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were recorded. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA), independent-sample t-test and chi-square tests. Results: When the SBSs of erupted and unerupted teeth were compared, only the Clearfil-SE Bond and G-Bond were significantly different. Bond strengths of all adhesive systems were higher in unerupted teeth than erupted teeth, except the Single-Bond system. Conclusions: When using conventional adhesives, bonding to erupted and unerupted teeth may not be significantly different. However, clinicians need to take into consideration the types of self-etching systems before usage.
      번역하기

      Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and failure-mode of orthodontic buttons bonded to erupted and unerupted teeth with conventional and self-etching adhesive systems. Methods: Eighty-four erupted ...

      Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and failure-mode of orthodontic buttons bonded to erupted and unerupted teeth with conventional and self-etching adhesive systems. Methods: Eighty-four erupted and 84 unerupted, human third-molar teeth were used. For both groups, the buccal surfaces of each tooth were assigned one of the following type of adhesive systems (n = 12). A, Conventional systems: 1, Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA); 2, Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, USA); 3, Single Bond (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA); and B, Self-etching adhesives; 4, Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Okayama, Japan); 5, Transbond Plus (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA); 6, Clearfil S3 (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan); 7, G Bond (GC, Tokyo, Japan). The SBSs of the attachments and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were recorded. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA), independent-sample t-test and chi-square tests. Results: When the SBSs of erupted and unerupted teeth were compared, only the Clearfil-SE Bond and G-Bond were significantly different. Bond strengths of all adhesive systems were higher in unerupted teeth than erupted teeth, except the Single-Bond system. Conclusions: When using conventional adhesives, bonding to erupted and unerupted teeth may not be significantly different. However, clinicians need to take into consideration the types of self-etching systems before usage.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      이번 연구의 목적은 맹출 또는 미맹출된 치아에 교정용 버튼을 부착 후 자가부식 접착제(self-etching adhesive)의 사용 유무에 대한 전단결합강도(shear bond strength)와 탈락모드를 비교하고자 함이다. 각각 84개의 맹출 또는 미맹출된 제3대구치를 사용하였다. 각각 치아의 협측면을 다음의 부착시스템 그룹으로 할당하였다. A, 기존방식: 1, Transbond XT (3M Unitek); 2, Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply/Caulk); 3, Single Bond (3M ESPE); B, 자가부식 접착제; 4, Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray); 5, Transbond Plus (3M Unitek); 6, Clearfil S3 (Kuraray); 7, G Bond (GC). 부착물의 전단강도와 접착제 잔류지수를 측정하였으며 결과값은 ANOVA와 independent t-test 및 chi-square 검증을 통해 분석되었다. 맹출 또는 미맹출된 치아의 전단결합강도를 비교하였을 때 Clearfil SE와 G Bond에서 유의한 차이가 관찰되었다. Single Bond를 제외한 모든 접착시스템에서 맹출보다는 미맹출 치아면에서 높은 접착강도가 관찰되었다. 기존 접착제를 사용하는 경우 맹출 또는 미맹출 치아에 대한 접착강도에는 차이가 없을 수 있다. 그러나 임상의사는 사용 전에 self-etching system의 종류를 고려할 필요가 있다.
      번역하기

      이번 연구의 목적은 맹출 또는 미맹출된 치아에 교정용 버튼을 부착 후 자가부식 접착제(self-etching adhesive)의 사용 유무에 대한 전단결합강도(shear bond strength)와 탈락모드를 비교하고자 함이...

      이번 연구의 목적은 맹출 또는 미맹출된 치아에 교정용 버튼을 부착 후 자가부식 접착제(self-etching adhesive)의 사용 유무에 대한 전단결합강도(shear bond strength)와 탈락모드를 비교하고자 함이다. 각각 84개의 맹출 또는 미맹출된 제3대구치를 사용하였다. 각각 치아의 협측면을 다음의 부착시스템 그룹으로 할당하였다. A, 기존방식: 1, Transbond XT (3M Unitek); 2, Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply/Caulk); 3, Single Bond (3M ESPE); B, 자가부식 접착제; 4, Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray); 5, Transbond Plus (3M Unitek); 6, Clearfil S3 (Kuraray); 7, G Bond (GC). 부착물의 전단강도와 접착제 잔류지수를 측정하였으며 결과값은 ANOVA와 independent t-test 및 chi-square 검증을 통해 분석되었다. 맹출 또는 미맹출된 치아의 전단결합강도를 비교하였을 때 Clearfil SE와 G Bond에서 유의한 차이가 관찰되었다. Single Bond를 제외한 모든 접착시스템에서 맹출보다는 미맹출 치아면에서 높은 접착강도가 관찰되었다. 기존 접착제를 사용하는 경우 맹출 또는 미맹출 치아에 대한 접착강도에는 차이가 없을 수 있다. 그러나 임상의사는 사용 전에 self-etching system의 종류를 고려할 필요가 있다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 MacColl GA, "The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases" 113 : 276-81, 1998

      2 Crabb HS, "The porous outer enamel of unerupted human premolars" 10 : 1-7, 1976

      3 Sharma-Sayal SK, "The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength" 124 : 74-82, 2003

      4 Bonar LC, "Structural and composition studies on the mineral of newly formed dental enamel: a chemical, x-ray diffraction, and 31P and proton nuclear magnetic resonance study" 11 : 1167-76, 1991

      5 Dorminey JC, "Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a modified 1-step etchant and primer technique" 124 : 410-3, 2003

      6 Romano FL, "Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with Self-Etching Primer" 75 : 849-53, 2005

      7 Miller MB, "Self-etching adhesives: solving the sensitivity conundrum" 14 : 406-, 2002

      8 Bhaskar SN, "Orban’s oral histology and embryology. 9th ed" The C.V. Mosby 46-106, 1980

      9 Kotsanos N, "Influence of posteruptive age of enamel on its susceptibility to artificial caries" 25 : 241-50, 1991

      10 Bishara SE, "Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets" 8 : 8-12, 2007

      1 MacColl GA, "The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases" 113 : 276-81, 1998

      2 Crabb HS, "The porous outer enamel of unerupted human premolars" 10 : 1-7, 1976

      3 Sharma-Sayal SK, "The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength" 124 : 74-82, 2003

      4 Bonar LC, "Structural and composition studies on the mineral of newly formed dental enamel: a chemical, x-ray diffraction, and 31P and proton nuclear magnetic resonance study" 11 : 1167-76, 1991

      5 Dorminey JC, "Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a modified 1-step etchant and primer technique" 124 : 410-3, 2003

      6 Romano FL, "Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with Self-Etching Primer" 75 : 849-53, 2005

      7 Miller MB, "Self-etching adhesives: solving the sensitivity conundrum" 14 : 406-, 2002

      8 Bhaskar SN, "Orban’s oral histology and embryology. 9th ed" The C.V. Mosby 46-106, 1980

      9 Kotsanos N, "Influence of posteruptive age of enamel on its susceptibility to artificial caries" 25 : 241-50, 1991

      10 Bishara SE, "Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets" 8 : 8-12, 2007

      11 Nordenvall KJ, "Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth: a comparison between 15 and 60 seconds of etching" 78 : 99-108, 1980

      12 Sfondrini MF, "Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass- ionomer" 119 : 30-5, 2001

      13 Buyukyilmaz T, "Effect of self-etching primers on bond strength - are they reliable?" 73 : 64-70, 2003

      14 Davari AR, "Effect of different types of enamel conditioners on" 8 : 36-43, 2007

      15 Bishara SE, "Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets" 119 : 621-4, 2001

      16 Artun J, "Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment" 85 : 333-40, 1984

      17 Tüfekçi E, "Bonding properties of newly erupted and mature premolars" 131 : 753-8, 2007

      18 Almy D, "Bonding properties of newly erupted and mature human premolars" Virginia Commonwealth University 2004

      19 Jacobs G, "Bonding characteristics of impacted versus erupted permanent teeth" 89 : 242-5, 1986

      20 Sheen DH, "Bond strength of younger and older permanent teeth with various etching times" 63 : 225-30, 1993

      21 Oliver RG, "Bond strength of orthodontic attachments to enamel from unerupted and erupted young permanent teeth" 8 : 123-6, 1986

      22 Tay FR, "An ultra-structural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin" 2 : 83-98, 2000

      23 White LW, "An expedited indirect bonding technique" 35 : 36-41, 2001

      24 Larmour CJ, "An ex vivo assessment of a bonding technique using a self-etching primer" 30 : 225-8, 2003

      25 Ooya K, "A scanning electron microscopic study on the differences between newly erupted teeth and old teeth with reference to fissure enamel surfaces and contents" 24 : 89-102, 1977

      26 Brudevold F, "A preliminary study of posteruptive maturation of teeth in situ" 16 : 243-8, 1982

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.13 0.47 0.83
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.67 0.55 0.311 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼