RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조선후기 상업의 발달과 화폐관의 변화 – 영조대 화폐논쟁을 중심으로 = Commercial Development and Changing Views of Currency in Late Joseon: Focusing on the Monetary Debates during King Yeongjo’s Reign

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110174819

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Joseon dynasty maintained a strong agrarian ideology that condemned commerce and profit-seeking as moral evils. Based on this principle, the state operated a controlled economy, intervening directly in production and distribution through systems such as tribute (gongnap) and licensed markets (sijeon). Yet these institutions caused inefficiencies, including high transport costs and corruption through intermediary exploitation (bangnap). To address these issues, the state adopted currency as a means to streamline tax collection and trade. After the Imjin War, expanding markets and the issuance of the Sangpyeong Tongbo under King Sukjong accelerated monetary circulation, while the Daedong Law standardized rice-based tax payments under public contractors (gongin).
    The coexistence of the Daedong Law and the Sangpyeong Tongbo system reflected the government’s effort to reconcile commercial growth with its enduring agrarian ideology. Currency circulation increased, but fiscal strain, social burdens, and periodic coin shortages (jeonhwang) persisted. Conservative officials denounced money as a source of inequality, while reformers emphasized its economic utility and advocated for commercial promotion.
    The monetary debates during King Yeongjo’s reign (1727~1735) epitomized this ideological tension. Proponents such as Hong Chi-jung and Lee Bong-sang viewed coinage as essential for trade expansion, while Yeongjo and others feared its disruptive impact on the agrarian and social order. Despite repeated bans on coin-based tax payments (Sunmoknyeong), currency circulation could not be reversed. Subsequent failures of alternative systems ultimately led Yeongjo to reinstate coin issuance(jujeon) and move gradually toward a monetized tax system.
    번역하기

    The Joseon dynasty maintained a strong agrarian ideology that condemned commerce and profit-seeking as moral evils. Based on this principle, the state operated a controlled economy, intervening directly in production and distribution through systems s...

    The Joseon dynasty maintained a strong agrarian ideology that condemned commerce and profit-seeking as moral evils. Based on this principle, the state operated a controlled economy, intervening directly in production and distribution through systems such as tribute (gongnap) and licensed markets (sijeon). Yet these institutions caused inefficiencies, including high transport costs and corruption through intermediary exploitation (bangnap). To address these issues, the state adopted currency as a means to streamline tax collection and trade. After the Imjin War, expanding markets and the issuance of the Sangpyeong Tongbo under King Sukjong accelerated monetary circulation, while the Daedong Law standardized rice-based tax payments under public contractors (gongin).
    The coexistence of the Daedong Law and the Sangpyeong Tongbo system reflected the government’s effort to reconcile commercial growth with its enduring agrarian ideology. Currency circulation increased, but fiscal strain, social burdens, and periodic coin shortages (jeonhwang) persisted. Conservative officials denounced money as a source of inequality, while reformers emphasized its economic utility and advocated for commercial promotion.
    The monetary debates during King Yeongjo’s reign (1727~1735) epitomized this ideological tension. Proponents such as Hong Chi-jung and Lee Bong-sang viewed coinage as essential for trade expansion, while Yeongjo and others feared its disruptive impact on the agrarian and social order. Despite repeated bans on coin-based tax payments (Sunmoknyeong), currency circulation could not be reversed. Subsequent failures of alternative systems ultimately led Yeongjo to reinstate coin issuance(jujeon) and move gradually toward a monetized tax system.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼