한국어 표현문형 담화기능과의 상관성 분석 연구- 지시적 화행을 중심으로 - = A Study on Correlation between Grammatical Pattern Expressions and their Pragmatic Functions

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Kang Hyoun Hwa. 2007. 6. 30. A Study on Correlation between Grammatical Pattern Expressions and their Pragmatic Functions. Bilingual Research 34, 1-26. This study examines the grammatical pattern expressions that appeared in the Korean conversation textbooks and learners' dictionaries. This study especially investigates the grammatical pattern expressions with the ending forms and classifies them by their discourse functions. In the lexically approached classification of patterns, the phrases and sentences are used as idiomatically fixed patterns. This study especially focuses on the lexically approached classification of patterns because special discourse functions appear only in the lexically approached classification of patterns. Since this study deals with the ‘directive’ discourse functions which are found only in the ending forms, I analyzes the ending forms only. Until now, the grammar teaching has only covered the forms and meanings of individual grammatical pattern expressions. However, learners want to know which grammatical pattern expressions can provide particular discourse functions and how to distinguish the usage of these grammatical pattern expressions with the same discourse function. In this regard, this study attempts to examine the distinctive usages of grammatical pattern expressions that have the same discourse functions in contrast with the previous studies. In particular, this study focuses on the discourse function of directive forms and analyzes the related grammatical pattern expressions.This study also divides the directive forms into the direct forms and indirect forms. This study can contribute to discussion of Discourse grammar and help Korean learners to use appropriate refusal expressions in their conversations. (Kyung Hee University)

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강현화, "한국어표현능력 향상을 위한 담화기능별 문형표현 단위에 대한 연구: ‘거절표현’을 중심으로" 23 (23): 5-25, 2007

2 유동청, "한국어와 중국어의 요청화행 비교연구" 경희대학교 대학원 2005

3 박지영, "한국어 학습자를 위한 요청화행 교육 방안 연구" 숙명여자대학교 대학원 2006

4 정민주, "한국어 요청화행 표현 연구" 2003

5 노주현, "한국어 요청화행 연구" 2001

6 강현화, "한국어 교재의 문형유형 분석-문형 등급화를 위해서" 국제한국어교육학회 18 (18): 3-23, 2007

7 국립국어원, "한국어 교재 분석 연구" 국립국어원 2006

8 한국교육개발원, "제7차 외국어과 교육과정 개발 연구" 교육과정개정연구위원회 1997

9 조경아, "일본인 한국어 학습자의 요청 화행에 관한 연구" 2003

10 김경석, "요청, 거부, 사과 발화 행위의 전략" 한국사회언어학회 4 (4): 143-169, 1996

11 김은영, "요청 화행의 상호 작용 구조 분석 연구: 일본어권 한국어 고급 학습자를 대상으로" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2003

12 이성순, "외국인 학습자의 한국어 요청 화행에 관한 연구" 2002

13 이경남, "문장문법에서 담화문법으로의 확대 필요성" 영어교육학회 51 (51): 1996

14 정희자, "담화와 문법" 한신문화사 1999

15 임규홍, "담화문법 교육에 대하여" 문법교육학회 (4) : 101-121, 2006

16 Norbert Schmitt, "Vocabulary in Language Teaching" Cambridge Language Education 2004

17 Levinson, "Pragmatics" Cambridge Univ Press 1983

18 Yule, George, "Pragmatics" Oxford University Press 1996

19 Brown P, "Politeness: Some universals in language" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987

20 Hymes Dell, "Foundations in Sociolinguistics" University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia Karin Aijmer?Anna-Brita 1974

21 Tsui A. B. M, "English Conversation" Oxford University Press 1994

22 Monica Heller, "Discourse and Interaction" The handbook of Stephen C 2001

23 Elite, O, "Discourse Analysis and Language Teaching" BlackwellPublishing Ltd 2001

24 Thomas F, "Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure" 4 (4): 91-112, 1983

25 박용예, "?영?한 화행 대조 분석 : 요청과 거절을 중심으로?" 1990