RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인수위 국민행복연금(안) 평가 = A Critical Review of the Proposal of the New Government on Pension, “National Happy Pension”

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99656167

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The new government of Korea has proposed to introduce basic pension in place of current Basic Old-age Pension. The proposal led to nationwide debate over how to implement the basic pension in terms of coverage, benefits and financing. One of the criticism about the proposal was that there could be disadvantage to National Pension subscribers with the introduction of basic pension. In response, the government revised the proposal to differentiate benefit amount according to subscription period of National Pension. Nevertheless, the proposal of basic pension is still debating since it doesn`t seem to be effective to achieve its aim of relieving old-age poverty of Korea while requiring tremendous amounts of tax to finance it. The proposal of basic pension is also criticized for having inappropriate impact on National Pension by hampering the subscription of low-income people. For low-income people, the benefit amount of basic pension could be more than benefit amount from National Pension and this is likely to lead to delinquency or withdrawal in National Pension. In addition, the integrated operation of National Pension and basic pension, which is also proposed by new government, raises the worries of diversion of National Pension fund into basic pension in the long term although the government announces that the basic pension is to be financed by tax. Considering the abovementioned circumstances, this study analyzes the proposal of the new government on pension, “National Happy Pension”. The study assesses pension policy of the new government and evaluates its expected impacts. Also, the study suggests options alternative to the government proposal.
    번역하기

    The new government of Korea has proposed to introduce basic pension in place of current Basic Old-age Pension. The proposal led to nationwide debate over how to implement the basic pension in terms of coverage, benefits and financing. One of the criti...

    The new government of Korea has proposed to introduce basic pension in place of current Basic Old-age Pension. The proposal led to nationwide debate over how to implement the basic pension in terms of coverage, benefits and financing. One of the criticism about the proposal was that there could be disadvantage to National Pension subscribers with the introduction of basic pension. In response, the government revised the proposal to differentiate benefit amount according to subscription period of National Pension. Nevertheless, the proposal of basic pension is still debating since it doesn`t seem to be effective to achieve its aim of relieving old-age poverty of Korea while requiring tremendous amounts of tax to finance it. The proposal of basic pension is also criticized for having inappropriate impact on National Pension by hampering the subscription of low-income people. For low-income people, the benefit amount of basic pension could be more than benefit amount from National Pension and this is likely to lead to delinquency or withdrawal in National Pension. In addition, the integrated operation of National Pension and basic pension, which is also proposed by new government, raises the worries of diversion of National Pension fund into basic pension in the long term although the government announces that the basic pension is to be financed by tax. Considering the abovementioned circumstances, this study analyzes the proposal of the new government on pension, “National Happy Pension”. The study assesses pension policy of the new government and evaluates its expected impacts. Also, the study suggests options alternative to the government proposal.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼