‘동아시아공동체’ 구상과 한반도 = 일본의 한국병탄 100주년을 맞아

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The first real change of regime in more than a half-century in Japan was a major event inspiring to Koreans too. Particularly noteworthy is the new ruling party’s design to pursue an ‘East Asian Community’. A crucial weakness in that design, however, is an insufficient awareness of the indispensable need to resolve the Korean Peninsula issue if any meaningful East Asian Community is to be realized.
There are other impediments to regional solidarity, including the division between ‘Japan and the rest’ and the disparity between ‘China and the rest’. A regional framework after the pattern of European Union is thus an unrealistic option. One must try to build a variety of other regional frameworks suited to the particular needs of East Asia, with significant input at the state level, to be sure, but involving either a looser inter-governmental collaboration (such as the Six-Party Talks) or greater input from business and civil society sectors; collective spaces not necessarily defined by state borders are also an important consideration. This process also calls for efforts to produce shared ideas peculiar to East Asia yet claiming global validity, and at the present stage collaboration between South Korean and Japanese intellectuals must play a particularly weighty role.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 글머리에
• 2. ‘동아시아공동체’와 한반도문제
• 3. 지역연대의 동아시아적 길 찾기
• 4. 한일연대에 대한 기대
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김석철, "희망의 한반도 프로젝트, in: 황해연합" 창비 2005

2 강태호, "천안함을 묻는다" 창비 2010

3 미야지마 히로시, "일본사 인식의 패러다임 전환을 위하여—‘한일병합’ 100주년에 즈음하여" (148) : 462-, 2010

4 백낙청, "어디가 중도며 어째서 변혁인가, in: 2007 남북정상회담 이후의 시민참여형 통일" 2009

5 류준필, "분단체제론과 동아시아론" 아세아문제연구소 52 (52): 38-72, 2009

6 "백낙청회화록, 제5권" 창비 183-184, 2007

7 백영서, "동아시아의 귀환—중국의 근대성을 묻는다" 창작과비평사 49-, 2000

8 강상중, "동북아시아 공동의 집을 향하여" 뿌리와이파리 2002

9 와다 하루키, "동북아시아 공동의 집" 일조각 2004

10 "討議: 朝鮮植民地支配とはなにだったのか" 158-, 2010

11 백낙청, "‘포용정책 2.0’을 향하여" (147) : 2010

12 사까모또 요시까즈, "21세기에 ‘동아시아 공동체’가 갖는 의미" (136) : 402-, 2009