RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    통일한국에 대비한 남북한 대학교육의 변천과정 및 지원체제에 관한 연구 = A Comparative Study on Higher Education Transition Processes and Support System in South and North Korea for Unification

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76388007

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    By analyzing and comparing a high educational system in North and South Korea, recovering Korean homogenecity and establishing a peaceful reunification from heterogenicity for the past 50 years.
    And studying history, curriculum and supporting system of 2 sides is good for deep understanding each other.
    In the South and North Korea, they established national system and dissolved national educational passion from foundation and expansion of higher education system depending upon each social characteristics after independence from Japan. And they have a policy for enlargement of opportunity in higher educational system.
    They were different from ideology. South Korea education system has been developed for higher educational system for autonomy depending upon economic development.
    But, North Korea education system has been developed for socialism construction. This fact in South and North Korea education system means openness in South and closeness in North.
    In higher education system, junior college in South have a relatively educated students joining with industrial field and North have educated students for scholarship and theory. In university of North they educated students for elite but in almost college except Kim II-Sung University, they educated students for scholarship and skill.
    A research method for comparing changed processes through printed matters is comparing both sides by checking openness, diversity, productivity and effectiveness by establishing authority cited
    In the openness aspect, South education system have a system with higher reality value, North have a special closeness in the excellence aspect and South students are different from each university. North students are not different from excellence since they took a negative view of skill-education. In the diversity aspect, both nations have commonly different education. In curriculum, South does not have difference between elite and non-elite. South have an autonomy for higher education depending upon desires of social system and students, but North does not have autonomy due to strong national control. So, south students can choose various curriculum, but North can't.
    In support system aspect, it is controlled by nation in North but South have a relatively autonomy. From this facts, we can prospect South have higher administrative efficiency from speciality and North have a central1-control system. So, they do not have a speciality for education.
    Conclusively, South education system are influenced by economic factors and North influenced by political factors. But both nations respect higher education as important national development index and their peoples have commonly a higher desire for education. Each education system was developed according to its social characteristics and functions having elite education and people education. so both nation have a different higher education system and transition process.
    There have been much limitation between South and North due to ideology and a political parallelism for discussing North Korea until now. But recently we can get some chances for deep discussion about North education systems.
    So comparing and analysing education systems with the transition processes which are much differences between both sides is very careful and difficult study. And promoting each merit from 2 sides are encouraging to understand each other's situation after unification of South and North.
    And there are not same things for showing a mode of unification. South suggested that depending on democratic philosophy, one people, one nation, one system and one government, on the other hand, North, one people, one nation, 2 systems and 2 governments, focusing on social classes, especially Kim II Sung's dictatorship. So anyway we can also easily find differences of educational goals from South and North.
    True nationalism
    번역하기

    By analyzing and comparing a high educational system in North and South Korea, recovering Korean homogenecity and establishing a peaceful reunification from heterogenicity for the past 50 years. And studying history, curriculum and supporting ...

    By analyzing and comparing a high educational system in North and South Korea, recovering Korean homogenecity and establishing a peaceful reunification from heterogenicity for the past 50 years.
    And studying history, curriculum and supporting system of 2 sides is good for deep understanding each other.
    In the South and North Korea, they established national system and dissolved national educational passion from foundation and expansion of higher education system depending upon each social characteristics after independence from Japan. And they have a policy for enlargement of opportunity in higher educational system.
    They were different from ideology. South Korea education system has been developed for higher educational system for autonomy depending upon economic development.
    But, North Korea education system has been developed for socialism construction. This fact in South and North Korea education system means openness in South and closeness in North.
    In higher education system, junior college in South have a relatively educated students joining with industrial field and North have educated students for scholarship and theory. In university of North they educated students for elite but in almost college except Kim II-Sung University, they educated students for scholarship and skill.
    A research method for comparing changed processes through printed matters is comparing both sides by checking openness, diversity, productivity and effectiveness by establishing authority cited
    In the openness aspect, South education system have a system with higher reality value, North have a special closeness in the excellence aspect and South students are different from each university. North students are not different from excellence since they took a negative view of skill-education. In the diversity aspect, both nations have commonly different education. In curriculum, South does not have difference between elite and non-elite. South have an autonomy for higher education depending upon desires of social system and students, but North does not have autonomy due to strong national control. So, south students can choose various curriculum, but North can't.
    In support system aspect, it is controlled by nation in North but South have a relatively autonomy. From this facts, we can prospect South have higher administrative efficiency from speciality and North have a central1-control system. So, they do not have a speciality for education.
    Conclusively, South education system are influenced by economic factors and North influenced by political factors. But both nations respect higher education as important national development index and their peoples have commonly a higher desire for education. Each education system was developed according to its social characteristics and functions having elite education and people education. so both nation have a different higher education system and transition process.
    There have been much limitation between South and North due to ideology and a political parallelism for discussing North Korea until now. But recently we can get some chances for deep discussion about North education systems.
    So comparing and analysing education systems with the transition processes which are much differences between both sides is very careful and difficult study. And promoting each merit from 2 sides are encouraging to understand each other's situation after unification of South and North.
    And there are not same things for showing a mode of unification. South suggested that depending on democratic philosophy, one people, one nation, one system and one government, on the other hand, North, one people, one nation, 2 systems and 2 governments, focusing on social classes, especially Kim II Sung's dictatorship. So anyway we can also easily find differences of educational goals from South and North.
    True nationalism

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ.서론
    • Ⅱ.이론적 배경과 비교의 영역 및 준거 설정
    • Ⅲ.남,북한 대학교육의 변천과정
    • Ⅳ.남.북한 대학교육의 지원체제
    • Ⅴ.요약, 결론 및 제언
    • Ⅰ.서론
    • Ⅱ.이론적 배경과 비교의 영역 및 준거 설정
    • Ⅲ.남,북한 대학교육의 변천과정
    • Ⅳ.남.북한 대학교육의 지원체제
    • Ⅴ.요약, 결론 및 제언
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼