백곡 처능(處能)의 ｢간폐석교소(諫廢釋敎疏)｣와왕실 불교사원의 철폐 = Demolition of Royal Buddhist Temples and Ganpuseokgyoso(諫廢釋敎疏)󰡕 Written by Baekgok Cheo-neung(白谷處能)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Buddhist community responded to the Joseon Dynasty's measures to suppress Buddhism in various ways. Among them, the so-called “Ganpuseokgyoso” in Baekgok in the middle of the Joseon Dynasty was a rumor that pointed out the injustice of the suppression of Buddhism in politics and society during the Joseon Dynasty and demanded a correction.
This study analyzes the indirect and direct causes of the use of cows in order to understand the true meaning of this rumor.
The indirect cause of this rumor is the trend of suppression in political society that developed until the middle of the Joseon Dynasty. In Taejong and Sejong Dynasties, the consolidation of denominations and the abolition of the Sangha during the Yonsangun Dynasty were policy measures to eliminate Buddhism. In Taejong Dynasty, when social measures to suppress Buddhism began in earnest, the Jujaga Rite of the Four Great Houses and the Family Grave System were implemented, and in December of the fourth year of the king's reign, measures were taken such as prohibiting women from going to temples to perform Buddhist rituals, and in 13, reinstating all those who had become bhikkhus as yangga virgins. In addition, the expansion of the power of Sarim in the middle of the Joseon Dynasty triggered harsher measures against pretend Buddhism, and the practice of Shinto Buddhism was increasingly discouraged in Joseon society.
Against this political and social backdrop, the Seungni crisis, the abolition of the royal Buddhist temple, and the revolutionization of the royal dynasty were carried out during the reign of King Hyeonjong, and the Yeo Baekgok asks for the fault and designation in six paragraphs. Therefore, the most important direct cause of the rumor was the closing of the Buddhist temples in and around the city, which had been maintained even under the pretense of Buddhism, as revealed in the introduction and conclusion of the rumor. The royal temples, which had been the center of the city's Buddhism and influenced not only the royal family but also Hanyang, the capital city, were removed and the monks reassigned throughout the artificial and current generations. Baekgok strongly pointed out the unreasonableness of the division of these temples inside and outside the city into Inner and Outer Wondang, the revolution of Wondang, the abolition of Jasuwon Insuwon, and the abolition of the statues enshrined there, and insisted that they be rescinded.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 高橋亨, "李朝佛敎" 寶文館 1929

2 김영태, "李朝代의 佛家上疏" 동국대 불교문화연구소 10 : 1973

3 동국대불교문화연구원, "현종실록 제4권" 1997

4 "현종실록"

5 김기영, "현정론․간폐석교소 - 조선시대호불론" 한국불교연구원 2003

6 김영태, "한국불교사" 경서원 1997

7 국사편찬위원회, "태종실록, 조선왕조실록"

8 "태종실록"

9 박병선, "조선후기 원당 연구" 영남대학교 대학원 2002

10 정석종, "조선후기 불교정책과 願堂" 영남대 민족문화연구소 18-19 : 1998

11 오경후, "조선후기 불교동향사 연구" 문현 2015

12 黃仁奎, "조선전기 불교계 고승의 上疏 검토" 한국불교학회 (43) : 159-192, 2005

13 원행, "조선이여, 법의 등불을 밝혀라 : 배불정책에 맞서 평화공존을 모색한 함허득통과 백곡처능" 불교신문사 2021

14 이기운, "조선시대 정업원의 설치와 불교신행" 한국종교학회 25 : 2001

15 李起雲, "조선시대 왕실의 比丘尼院 설치와 信行" 역사학회 178 : 29-58, 2003

16 진관 운붕 도관, "조선승군사상사" 한강출판사 2019

17 자현, "조선 불교 철폐에 맞서다" 조계종출판사 2019

18 "인종실록"

19 정동주, "부처 통곡하다 - 조선오백년불교탄압사" 이룸 2003

20 한기두, "백곡처능의 간폐석교소에 관한 연구" 조선시대편, 불함문화사 148 : 2004

21 황인규, "백곡처능(白谷處能)의 생애와 호법(護法)활동*" 불교학연구원 10 (10): 272-314, 2018

22 김용조, "백곡처능(白谷處能)의 간폐석교소(諫廢釋敎疏)에 관한 연구" 한국불교학회 4 : 1979

23 오철우, "백곡 처능(白谷處能)의 사상과 시적 형상화의 특징" 동아시아불교문화학회 (55) : 211-239, 2023

24 임재완, "대각등계집" 동국대출판부 2015

25 염중섭(자현), "간폐석교소(諫廢釋敎疎)의 이방역(異邦域) 비판에 대한 종합적 고찰" 불교학연구원 10 (10): 315-354, 2018

26 "顯宗改修實錄"

27 "退耕堂全書 제 2권 한국사찰전서(上, 下)"

28 白谷處能, "諫廢釋敎䟽, 大覺登階集"

29 金錫胄撰, "白谷集序文"

30 忽滑谷快天, "朝鮮禪敎史"

31 오경후, "朝鮮後期 佛敎政策과 對應論－白谷 處能의 「諫廢釋敎疏」를 中心으로－" 한국역사민속학회 (31) : 125-152, 2009

32 오경후, "朝鮮 中後期 金山寺와 禪敎兼修 傾向" 불교문화연구원 (72) : 201-228, 2015

33 崔錫鼎, "明谷集"

34 李能和, "因疏撤院首相秦對" 寶蓮閣 1982

35 오경후, "『諫廢釋敎疏』에 나타난 護法과 護國의 相卽性" 한국불교선리연구원 (31) : 315-353, 2021